The questions going forward is how the House is going to settle differences with the Senate. The House can adopt whatever rules they want to that guarantee floor votes on whack-a-doodle legislation or budget riders that require Alejandro Mayorkas’ salary to be paid in the giant stone currency of Easter Island. But when the Senate refuses to go along, I'm wondering how will this stuff get resolved?
The traditional way to resolve such differences is a conference committee between the two chambers. The Speaker appoints the House conferees, and the final agreement of the conference committee is non-amendable. This might create a scenario where McCarthy lets his Freedom Caucus members go nuts in passing insane conditions on the debt ceiling or budget bills, but then appoints more reasonable members to the conference committee who agree to drop them from the final product? Who knows...I may be projecting more strategic thinking onto McCarthy than he is actually capable of. McCarthy’s strategic thinking might just be that he just wants to get through the next five minutes, and he’ll figure out the rest later.