• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

House Approves $70 Billion For War

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
We have an obligation to the US citizens and the troops to respect their lives. Bring them home and prosecute those responsible for this unwarranted war. They bare the responsibility, not the American people!
Click to expand...

Start with congress first then!
Click to expand...

No, going to congress would accomplish nothing and you know it. We need a change from the status quo. Ron Paul will be the thorn in all those money grubbing power grabbing asses.
Click to expand...

No, I meant start with prosecuting congress first then, if thats what you suggest!
Click to expand...

Congress didn't lie, they were just complacent and willing to do anything for king bush. You are trying to spin it. You know as well as I do the ones pushing for it was bush/cheney and the PNAC crew.
 
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
We have an obligation to the US citizens and the troops to respect their lives. Bring them home and prosecute those responsible for this unwarranted war. They bare the responsibility, not the American people!
Click to expand...

Start with congress first then!
Click to expand...

No, going to congress would accomplish nothing and you know it. We need a change from the status quo. Ron Paul will be the thorn in all those money grubbing power grabbing asses.
Click to expand...

No, I meant start with prosecuting congress first then, if thats what you suggest!
Click to expand...

Congress didn't lie, they were just complacent and willing to do anything for king bush. You are trying to spin it. You know as well as I do the ones pushing for it was bush/cheney and the PNAC crew.
Click to expand...

:thumbsup:
 
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Congress didn't lie, they were just complacent and willing to do anything for king bush. You are trying to spin it. You know as well as I do the ones pushing for it was bush/cheney and the PNAC crew.
Click to expand...

Why is this subject still up for debate? :roll:

Congress voted for the war. Period. Quit spinning.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Congress didn't lie, they were just complacent and willing to do anything for king bush. You are trying to spin it. You know as well as I do the ones pushing for it was bush/cheney and the PNAC crew.
Click to expand...

Why is this subject still up for debate? :roll:

Congress voted for the war. Period. Quit spinning.
Click to expand...

They voted for no "war". They voted for "military action" based on lies and misdirection. bush and the executive branch went after it quickly knowing to strike while people were scared. The constant bombardment of your TV set and your mind "TERROR TERROR TERROR" all the damned time. Whipped everyone into a fear mongering frenzy all because of the bush agenda. You are a known partisan hack and will justify it in some way or another. But as for me and many others we now see (hind sight 20/20) how the wool was pulled over our eyes and continues to be. The irreplaceable lives lost at the hands of a tyrannical group called neo-conservatives, the bending of truths through word spin to gain public approval and the insatiable appetite for power & oil. You would rather hide behind your "party" rather than to face any moral judgment in your mind, and this, is sad.
 
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
They voted for no "war". They voted for "military action" based on lies and misdirection. bush and the executive branch went after it quickly knowing to strike while people were scared. The constant bombardment of your TV set and your mind "TERROR TERROR TERROR" all the damned time. Whipped everyone into a fear mongering frenzy all because of the bush agenda. You are a known partisan hack and will justify it in some way or another. But as for me and many others we now see (hind sight 20/20) how the wool was pulled over our eyes and continues to be. The irreplaceable lives lost at the hands of a tyrannical group called neo-conservatives, the bending of truths through word spin to gain public approval and the insatiable appetite for power & oil. You would rather hide behind your "party" rather than to face any moral judgment in your mind, and this, is sad.
Click to expand...

I love how you are so quick to dismiss me as a partisan hack who hides behind a party. Im not a republican or a democrat. Im a conservative. You, are just another Ron Paul loon.
 
Pussies.

They should've held back and caused a government stop. The PNAC pigs don't deserve a single inch. But you know what's sad, I bet the majority of democrats want the war just as much as they do..

So I retract my "Pussies" comment, and replace it with "pigs".

I'm going to write in my cat for president.
 
Originally posted by: bamacre
No real conservative would support the war in Iraq.
Click to expand...

I never did. But I do support finishing what we started.

And most of the Paul supporters I see are not true conservatives to begin with. They are just anti-war, anti-bush, anti-republican.
 
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: bamacre
No real conservative would support the war in Iraq.
Click to expand...

I never did. But I do support finishing what we started.

And most of the Paul supporters I see are not true conservatives to begin with. They are just anti-war, anti-bush, anti-republican.
Click to expand...

:roll:

No, just anti-idiot, which is why I don't like you either.
 
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: bamacre
No real conservative would support the war in Iraq.
Click to expand...

I never did. But I do support finishing what we started.

And most of the Paul supporters I see are not true conservatives to begin with. They are just anti-war, anti-bush, anti-republican.
Click to expand...

:roll:

No, just anti-idiot, which is why I don't like you either.
Click to expand...

:laugh: :thumbsup:
 
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
They voted for no "war". They voted for "military action" based on lies and misdirection. bush and the executive branch went after it quickly knowing to strike while people were scared. The constant bombardment of your TV set and your mind "TERROR TERROR TERROR" all the damned time. Whipped everyone into a fear mongering frenzy all because of the bush agenda. You are a known partisan hack and will justify it in some way or another. But as for me and many others we now see (hind sight 20/20) how the wool was pulled over our eyes and continues to be. The irreplaceable lives lost at the hands of a tyrannical group called neo-conservatives, the bending of truths through word spin to gain public approval and the insatiable appetite for power & oil. You would rather hide behind your "party" rather than to face any moral judgment in your mind, and this, is sad.
Click to expand...

I love how you are so quick to dismiss me as a partisan hack who hides behind a party. Im not a republican or a democrat. Im a conservative. You, are just another Ron Paul loon.
Click to expand...

Uhh is your name pabster? 😕 ROFL, why are you answering for pabster? One and the same? Different personalities?
 
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Uhh is your name pabster? 😕 ROFL, why are you answering for pabster? One and the same? Different personalities?
Click to expand...

Probably the same reason your koolaid driniking buddies are answering for you!
 
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Uhh is your name pabster? 😕 ROFL, why are you answering for pabster? One and the same? Different personalities?
Click to expand...

Probably the same reason your koolaid driniking buddies are answering for you!
Click to expand...

lol wow

Anyone can see how idiotic you are now :laugh:
 
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
They voted for no "war". They voted for "military action" based on lies and misdirection.
Click to expand...

Ah, right. You're arguing semantics, and being intellectually dishonest (as usual).

These people knew full well that "military action" would entail war, and they voted for it. Period. Your spinning and ducking won't change the votes on record and those who cast them.
 
If I authorize you to be an asshole and you go ahead and be one, it's YOUR fault. You had a choice. Same applies to giving any sitting president the authorization to use force. You can't blame the people just for giving an asshole enough rope to hang himself with. But you are welcome to try. The whole misery loves company excuse is fun to listen to but it is pure, unmitigated bullshit.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
They voted for no "war". They voted for "military action" based on lies and misdirection.
Click to expand...

Ah, right. You're arguing semantics, and being intellectually dishonest (as usual).

These people knew full well that "military action" would entail war, and they voted for it. Period. Your spinning and ducking won't change the votes on record and those who cast them.
Click to expand...

The only one spinning and ducking is, and always has been, you.

EDIT: And I think I had it wrong anyways, it was "Use of force". Regardless, you dodge morality to justify insanity.
 
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
The only one spinning and ducking is, and always has been, you.

EDIT: And I think I had it wrong anyways, it was "Use of force". Regardless, you dodge morality to justify insanity.
Click to expand...

"Use Of Force", "Military Action", "War" ... You're arguing semantics, again. :|

Why you continue to make excuses for those who cast their votes is beyond me.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
The only one spinning and ducking is, and always has been, you.

EDIT: And I think I had it wrong anyways, it was "Use of force". Regardless, you dodge morality to justify insanity.
Click to expand...

"Use Of Force", "Military Action", "War" ... You're arguing semantics, again. :|

Why you continue to make excuses for those who cast their votes is beyond me.
Click to expand...

You continue to make excuses for this administration. Sad when there is so much evidence against your bushism bullshit.
 
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
You continue to make excuses for this administration. Sad when there is so much evidence against your bushism bullshit.
Click to expand...

And you continue to dodge and weave, spin and duck. Now you're changing the topic to "this administration". Have you taken your BDS pills this morning?
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
You continue to make excuses for this administration. Sad when there is so much evidence against your bushism bullshit.
Click to expand...

And you continue to dodge and weave, spin and duck. Now you're changing the topic to "this administration". Have you taken your BDS pills this morning?
Click to expand...

Pabster, this whole conversation has been about this administration and its deeds (war included). Although I wouldn't call it a conversation, more like "defend bushism at all costs, even at the cost of my own morality." :roll:
 
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Pabster, this whole conversation has been about this administration and its deeds (war included). Although I wouldn't call it a conversation, more like "defend bushism at all costs, even at the cost of my own morality." :roll:
Click to expand...

No, it's been about a bunch of spineless partisan hacks who talk the talk but can't walk the walk. (I'll elaborate if you can't figure this one out.)

Then it was you making excuses for those who voted for war in the first place.

Last, it was you going off on a general BDS rant about "this administration..."
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Pabster, this whole conversation has been about this administration and its deeds (war included). Although I wouldn't call it a conversation, more like "defend bushism at all costs, even at the cost of my own morality." :roll:
Click to expand...

No, it's been about a bunch of spineless partisan hacks who talk the talk but can't walk the walk. (I'll elaborate if you can't figure this one out.)

Then it was you making excuses for those who voted for war in the first place.

Last, it was you going off on a general BDS rant about "this administration..."
Click to expand...

Wow lol

You are clearly a partisan hack and if I were allowed to have a poll in P&N I would prove it. I care not for party, I care for policy and morality, of which, you know nothing about. Again, this administration is guilty of providing false information in order to sway minds into its agenda. But you will come back with some other BS derailing the topic once again and continue to justify insanity with partisan semantics and willful ignorance.
 
So tell us Corbett, what makes someone a real conservative? Which part of the Republican party are the true conservatives? The ones that spend trillions of dollars pushing us further in debt? The ones that wage pre-emptive war because someday somebody might attack us?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top