*HOT!* Pentium4 Emergency Edition for only $857 at the Egg! :D

InlineFive

Diamond Member
Sep 20, 2003
9,599
2
0
Check it out! I think it's a pretty sweet deal! :D
rolleye.gif


-Por
 

formulav8

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2000
7,004
522
126
You can get a AthlonFX cheaper than that. And it is faster in most things. And you have a free performance boost when you upgrade to windows xp 64bit.


Jason
 

GetSome681

Senior member
Oct 4, 2002
242
0
0
Originally posted by: formulav8
You can get a AthlonFX cheaper than that. And it is faster in most things. And you have a free performance boost when you upgrade to windows xp 64bit.


Jason

When are people going to realize that moving from 32 bit to 64 bit doesn't equal 2x the performance. Sure it adds performance in other areas, but the switch from 32-64 itself doesn't.

 

mjquilly

Golden Member
Jun 12, 2000
1,692
0
76
Originally posted by: GetSome681
Originally posted by: formulav8
You can get a AthlonFX cheaper than that. And it is faster in most things. And you have a free performance boost when you upgrade to windows xp 64bit.


Jason

When are people going to realize that moving from 32 bit to 64 bit doesn't equal 2x the performance. Sure it adds performance in other areas, but the switch from 32-64 itself doesn't.

check your math son, 64 DOES equal 32 times 2.
 

froinlaven

Senior member
Jun 9, 2003
339
0
0
Originally posted by: mjquilly
Originally posted by: GetSome681
Originally posted by: formulav8
You can get a AthlonFX cheaper than that. And it is faster in most things. And you have a free performance boost when you upgrade to windows xp 64bit.


Jason

When are people going to realize that moving from 32 bit to 64 bit doesn't equal 2x the performance. Sure it adds performance in other areas, but the switch from 32-64 itself doesn't.

check your math son, 64 DOES equal 32 times 2.

He's talking about actual performance, not marketing hype...
 

modedepe

Diamond Member
May 11, 2003
3,474
0
0
Well this sure is hot *cough*

check your math son, 64 DOES equal 32 times 2.
I seriously hope you don't think just cause 64=32*2 it's double the performance.
 

Triggerhappy007

Golden Member
Jan 6, 2001
1,550
0
0
Originally posted by: GetSome681
Originally posted by: formulav8
You can get a AthlonFX cheaper than that. And it is faster in most things. And you have a free performance boost when you upgrade to windows xp 64bit.


Jason

When are people going to realize that moving from 32 bit to 64 bit doesn't equal 2x the performance. Sure it adds performance in other areas, but the switch from 32-64 itself doesn't.

Jason never mentioned anything about 2X the performance.

BTW, OP, you got the Emergency from Maximum PC Magazine didn't you?
 

bunnyfubbles

Lifer
Sep 3, 2001
12,248
3
0
yeah but you get support for 16GB of ram right off the bat, which is a must have, anything less than 8GB is the suck
 

ValsalvaYourHeartOut

Senior member
Apr 30, 2001
777
0
0
Originally posted by: modedepe
Well this sure is hot *cough*

check your math son, 64 DOES equal 32 times 2.
I seriously hope you don't think just cause 64=32*2 it's double the performance.

I wouldn't be surprised if he did...you should see some of the moronic responses I've gotten over in the Raptor thread...

Valsalva
 

ThisIsMatt

Banned
Aug 4, 2000
11,820
1
0
Originally posted by: ValsalvaYourHeartOut
Originally posted by: modedepe
Well this sure is hot *cough*

check your math son, 64 DOES equal 32 times 2.
I seriously hope you don't think just cause 64=32*2 it's double the performance.

I wouldn't be surprised if he did...you should see some of the moronic responses I've gotten over in the Raptor thread...

Valsalva
lol, yeah I read some of that. All these lamers getting boners when they hear SATA...
 

Redviffer

Senior member
Oct 30, 2002
830
0
0
From the article:

Gaming is the one area in the preview that is a disappointment. As you can see, the standard benchmark games under XP64 Preview were 4% to 51% slower than 32-bit, with the average speed about 20% slower. It is far too early to reach any conclusions in this area, but there is a lot of driver optimization to be done to make up this kind of delta. With the CPU and memory providing faster 64-bit performance, we have to believe the drivers play a big part in this disappointing gaming performance.

I'm thinking this is certainly a driver issue, as everything else shows a gain from 32 to 64bit. Certainly not 2x performance though.
 

mjquilly

Golden Member
Jun 12, 2000
1,692
0
76
whatever, the opteronion has 64 bits, that's twice as many bits, so it IS twices as gooder. and the SATA drives have about 3-4X the throughput on all the benchmarks i've done.
 

ThisIsMatt

Banned
Aug 4, 2000
11,820
1
0
Originally posted by: mjquilly
whatever, the opteronion has 64 bits, that's twice as many bits, so it IS twices as gooder. and the SATA drives have about 3-4X the throughput on all the benchmarks i've done.
Go take a course in computer architecture. Your statements thus far have zero merit, and only serve to make yourself look like a dumbass.
 

phillydog

Senior member
Dec 19, 2001
472
0
0
Originally posted by: mjquilly
Originally posted by: GetSome681
Originally posted by: formulav8
You can get a AthlonFX cheaper than that. And it is faster in most things. And you have a free performance boost when you upgrade to windows xp 64bit.


Jason

When are people going to realize that moving from 32 bit to 64 bit doesn't equal 2x the performance. Sure it adds performance in other areas, but the switch from 32-64 itself doesn't.

check your math son, 64 DOES equal 32 times 2.

Just cause the OS is 64-bit, doesn't mean the apps are. There are few apps that are compiled on 64-bit processor boxes to run on 64-bit boxes.... this doesn't mean that they are using the 64-bit code, just that they are compiled on it to run.

Thus, running a 32-bit app (compiled on 64-bit box), will still run at 32-bit, hence no performance...

This is seen alot on the HP-UX 11 64-bit.
 

Triggerhappy007

Golden Member
Jan 6, 2001
1,550
0
0
Originally posted by: ThisIsMatt
Originally posted by: mjquilly
whatever, the opteronion has 64 bits, that's twice as many bits, so it IS twices as gooder. and the SATA drives have about 3-4X the throughput on all the benchmarks i've done.
Go take a course in computer architecture. Your statements thus far have zero merit, and only serve to make yourself look like a dumbass.

Can't you tell that he's just pulling your leg?
 

pillage2001

Lifer
Sep 18, 2000
14,038
1
81
Originally posted by: mjquilly
whatever, the opteronion has 64 bits, that's twice as many bits, so it IS twices as gooder. and the SATA drives have about 3-4X the throughput on all the benchmarks i've done.

j000 aer teh WiNNNNNNN4R!!!!!!
 

InlineFive

Diamond Member
Sep 20, 2003
9,599
2
0
Originally posted by: mjquilly
whatever, the opteronion has 64 bits, that's twice as many bits, so it IS twices as gooder. and the SATA drives have about 3-4X the throughput on all the benchmarks i've done.

LOL! :D
 

Snoop

Golden Member
Oct 11, 1999
1,424
0
76
Originally posted by: mjquilly
whatever, the opteronion has 64 bits, that's twice as many bits, so it IS twices as gooder. and the SATA drives have about 3-4X the throughput on all the benchmarks i've done.
I wanna get me one of them opteronion's.