dimwit:
How nice for you that you found "All the editor's choices" at CNET and looked at them.
But you missed my question:
I asked you which FLATBED scanners use CCD?
None of the ones's you mentioned ARE flatbed scanners.
Even the Mustek that looks like that is 4" high.
http://www.Mustek.com/Imaging/products/discontinued/1200-iii-ep.htm
To your "understanding":
The issue with CIS is not the limitation of the pixels but the type of sensor used. CIS uses the cheaper CMOS sensor.
No doubt that until today the S/N (signal to noise ratio) of CCD sensors is much better than their CMOS cousins, i.e. they are much more sensitive.
That is not the point here.
You said :
"..but all high end and medium range flatbed scanners are CCD. Only the low end flatbeds are CIS.."
Meanwhile you agreed that CIS flatbed's can indeed be high end too.
I just would learn about the other statement you did regarding "..all high end and medium range flatbed scanners are CCD.." .
But anyhow, the deal is dead now. RIP.