• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Hostettler mounting campaign to change the name of Interstate 69

BBond

Diamond Member
From the truth is funnier than fiction department.

Local religious groups in Indiana don't like the sound of "I-69".

Hostettler mounting campaign to change the name of Interstate 69

By August Wayne, THG News

John Hostettler, the Congressman representing the 8th district of Indiana, has been convinced by local religious groups to introduce legislation in the House that would change the name of an Interstate 69 extension to a more moral sounding number.

There are plans to extend the interstate from Indianapolis through southwestern Indiana all the way through Texas into Mexico in the coming years. While most believe this highway will be good for the state?s economy, religious conservatives believe ?I-69? sounds too risqué and want to change the interstate?s number.

Hostettler, a proponent of the interstate extension, agrees. ?Every time I have been out in the public with an ?I-69? button on my lapel, teenagers point and snicker at it. I have had many ask me if they can have my button. I believe it is time to change the name of the highway. It is the moral thing to do.?

As a matter of fact, naming the highway?s extension I-69 is a violation of the Interstate Highway System?s rules for numbering roads. Interstates numbers are to increase from west to east. If the extension through southern Indiana is named I-69, then 69 will be west of I-65, a direct violation.

?Naming the road I-63 not only follows numbering guidelines, it doesn?t have the sexual undertones that I-69 has,? says Hostettler, ?It is a win-win situation.?

The change will more than likely be introduced in committee when Congress convenes after the first of the year.


 
LOL! That is too funny! :laugh:

Anyway, a quick look at a map shows me that:
- The existing stretch of I-69 north of Indianapolis is east of I-65, so it is in compliance with current naming guidleines. Changing the name to I-63 would bring it out of compliance.
- There is no need to extend I-69 through southwestern Indiana and down into Texas. There are numerous other alternative routes and you easterners already have far too many interstate highways already. If they're gonna waste money on that pork, then they should build the much-needed I-7 over the obsolete US97 through Central Oregon and Washington.
 
Back
Top