dammitgibs
Senior member
- Jan 31, 2009
- 477
- 0
- 0
If you can dodge a wrench you can dodge an iron beam
There have been many deaths on far less infamous tracks, it happens in such a sporting event.
The only previous Olympic luge fatality was at Innsbruck in 1964 -- the first Games to include luge -- when British competitor Kazimierz Kay died during a training run.
They need to at least wrap some fucking foam around those exposed iron beams.
The International Luge Federation and Vancouver Olympic officials said their investigation showed that the crash was the result of human error and that “there was no indication that the accident was caused by deficiencies in the track.
not sure enough foam could possibly be used to make it safe. plexi deflect shields around the dodgy area to keep people from flying off the track is a better idea
Why? Those guys are extreme athletes and know the dangers. It's no different than any other extreme sport and it will keep tens of millions of people glued to their TV tubes watching and waiting for the next accident.
Much like NASCAR.
The part he died due to wasn't even one of the parts they were worried about the danger of.
It is dangerous but to dismiss the concerns about this track under the idea that "it's just dangerous, live with it or go home" is silly especially in light of that post showing that nobody has died from this sport in 46 years.
Nets right on top of the track. Minimizing upward traveling movements, fine mesh made out of high strength materials... These nets would be deployed above the corners where accidents like these are possible. Viewing obstruction is MINIMAL, and it's also a lot softer than plexi-glass. The time that a lugger would spend underneath these nets would be fraction of a second.
Seriously, you should think "outside of the box" every once in a while, schools don't generally touch much on the subject of common sense.
The softness is irrelevant, as the plexiglass should act as a smooth extension of the track itself and define a sort of tube to redirect the participant onto the iced portions of the track. The flexibility of the net is actually more of a danger IMO as it allows a small chance of the rider being hurtled back onto the edge rather than the sliding surface of the track after the net deforms.
edit: the net would most likely be much cheaper
http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2010/02/13/probe-olympic-track-didnt-cause-lugers-death/
IOC not making any major changes to track, blame it on human error.
Not sure what a person is supposed to do with the information. If you're another luger and they're saying it was human error and you're like "Well, that other guy was pretty damn good, so what am I supposed to do to avoid the same thing?" it's not helpful information. Technically you could argue human error whenever anybody dies in an extreme sport that isn't directly attributable to equipment error but I can't see how they can ignore course variables. Going into a corner too early or late is quite literally how everybody loses or wins in this sport so it's not like other athletes can say "Oh, well, I'll just be sure to time my corners perfectly".Classless, absolutely classless.
Not sure what a person is supposed to do with the information. If you're another luger and they're saying it was human error and you're like "Well, that other guy was pretty damn good, so what am I supposed to do to avoid the same thing?" it's not helpful information. Technically you could argue human error whenever anybody dies in an extreme sport that isn't directly attributable to equipment error but I can't see how they can ignore course variables. Going into a corner too early or late is quite literally how everybody loses or wins in this sport so it's not like other athletes can say "Oh, well, I'll just be sure to time my corners perfectly".
