- Jul 3, 2001
- 10,784
- 6
- 81
I've been working on this one problem for a while (couple hours), can't seem to get it.
Professor Bunyan thinks he has discovered a remarkable property of binary search trees. Suppose that the search for key k in a binary search tree ends up in a leaf. Consider three sets: A, the keys to the left of the search path; B, the keys on the search path; and C, the keys to the right of the search path. Professor Bunyan claims that any three keys a E A, b E B, c E C must satisfy a<=b<=c. Give a smallest possible counterexample to the professor?s claim.
I can't come up with an example period, let alone the smallest possible. If you've got any hints, ideas, whatever I'd be happy to entertain them as I've run out of ideas.
Professor Bunyan thinks he has discovered a remarkable property of binary search trees. Suppose that the search for key k in a binary search tree ends up in a leaf. Consider three sets: A, the keys to the left of the search path; B, the keys on the search path; and C, the keys to the right of the search path. Professor Bunyan claims that any three keys a E A, b E B, c E C must satisfy a<=b<=c. Give a smallest possible counterexample to the professor?s claim.
I can't come up with an example period, let alone the smallest possible. If you've got any hints, ideas, whatever I'd be happy to entertain them as I've run out of ideas.