Originally posted by: Hacp
What about Reverend White? He was Obama's pastor for gods sake. Its almost a given that he rubbed some of his ideas onto Obama.
SILENCE, DISSENTER! SILENCE!
Originally posted by: Hacp
What about Reverend White? He was Obama's pastor for gods sake. Its almost a given that he rubbed some of his ideas onto Obama.
Originally posted by: retrospooty
That would be the FUD.
What exactly is it that you think is going on here? the DHS is on the lookout for right wing terrorists... What is wrong with that and what negative agenda do either of you think is being pushed with it?
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: OCguy
If this isnt a boogyman, I dont know what is. Lock your doors, there are war vets returning home!
So, what do the people who complained about the Bush administration spreading fear have to say?
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=94803
http://www.washingtontimes.com...-of-radicals-on-right/
WASHINGTON ? A newly unclassified Department of Homeland Security report warns against the possibility of violence by unnamed "right-wing extremists" concerned about illegal immigration, increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, abortion and the loss of U.S. sovereignty and singles out returning war veterans as particular threats"
What, are you taking Winnar111's place as the right wing hate blog poster of the day now that he is banned? Is it coming to the point where you will just post anything at all to spread your FUD?
Anyhow, sorry your attempt to paint this in a bad light has failed. If there is anything I fear on this country it is the extreme right nutjobs like hte ones described in the article. Taliban... Al Qaeda... They really cant do much damage now that the element of surprise is in order - the ultra religios right wing nutjob with guns and ammo is a far more realistic threat.
Originally posted by: OCguy
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: OCguy
If this isnt a boogyman, I dont know what is. Lock your doors, there are war vets returning home!
So, what do the people who complained about the Bush administration spreading fear have to say?
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=94803
http://www.washingtontimes.com...-of-radicals-on-right/
WASHINGTON ? A newly unclassified Department of Homeland Security report warns against the possibility of violence by unnamed "right-wing extremists" concerned about illegal immigration, increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, abortion and the loss of U.S. sovereignty and singles out returning war veterans as particular threats"
What, are you taking Winnar111's place as the right wing hate blog poster of the day now that he is banned? Is it coming to the point where you will just post anything at all to spread your FUD?
Anyhow, sorry your attempt to paint this in a bad light has failed. If there is anything I fear on this country it is the extreme right nutjobs like hte ones described in the article. Taliban... Al Qaeda... They really cant do much damage now that the element of surprise is in order - the ultra religios right wing nutjob with guns and ammo is a far more realistic threat.
Really? You think the Washington Times is a "hate-blog"?
There is only 1 poster left that constantly posts blog "articles". If you ever see me do it, please be sure and let me know
It was also the leader on Drudge today, and that site has more influence on the American people and media than any other.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business...tory?id=2915370&page=1
If you feel that this was some sort of hit piece, I dont know what to tell you.
If you think that the article is false, please state the points that you think are a lie. Otherwise, you look like a leftie that is trying to discredit an OP who was just posting something that somebody else would have 3 minutes later anyway.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: retrospooty
That would be the FUD.
What exactly is it that you think is going on here? the DHS is on the lookout for right wing terrorists... What is wrong with that and what negative agenda do either of you think is being pushed with it?
To be on the look out for freedom fighters and opposition and freedom of expression and assembly.
When those people agreed with you you're fine with it, but turn the shoe and you're not. Who's the tyrant now? Freedom of speech, as long as you agree with me. We're taking back the language and taking back representation.
Originally posted by: spidey07
So what is the new monkey going to do about it?
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: spidey07
So what is the new monkey going to do about it?
That's RACIST!!!
![]()
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Something to ponder...
When the Democrats had complete control of the government in the 60s it was the radical left that was setting off bombs and killing people.
And then the government swung almost completely to the right throughout the 1980s and it became the right that started setting off bombs and killing people. (Oklahoma, abortion clinics + doctors)
So now that the left has taken over could we see the radical left reemerge?? Or is that trend done and over with??
BTW I think the story is correct. The chances of another Waco or Ruby Ridge are much much higher under a Democrat like Obama than under a Republican.
Originally posted by: Modelworks
The threat I think the government should watch out for are disgruntled employees and people who have no work. I am really surprised that nobody tried to shoot people like Madoff. I heard a guy on the radio say that if he lost his job and couldn't feed his family , he was going to grab his gun and head to the local grocery store with other unemployed people and take what they needed. That is the kind of thinking they need to watch out for.
Originally posted by: tweaker2
Originally posted by: Fern
Quite likely because the left-wing radical report hasn't been reported by the MSM.
OTOH, the one against right wing radicals has been widely reported. For some reason it has been all over the news.
We've even had threads here about it before (i.e., this is a repost but the search function isn't working for me ATM).
Fern
Seeing as if the sources aren't presently known(?) concerning the distribution of the right wing radical report, it seems plausible to me that "the spreading around" of the right wing radical report could have come from the right wing radicals themselves attacking the report to defend themselves.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Something to ponder...
When the Democrats had complete control of the government in the 60s it was the radical left that was setting off bombs and killing people.
And then the government swung almost completely to the right throughout the 1980s and it became the right that started setting off bombs and killing people. (Oklahoma, abortion clinics + doctors)
So now that the left has taken over could we see the radical left reemerge?? Or is that trend done and over with??
BTW I think the story is correct. The chances of another Waco or Ruby Ridge are much much higher under a Democrat like Obama than under a Republican.
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: OCguy
Yes, because one nut in the 90s is relevant to what right now?
Because he fit the description of what DHS is on the look out for to a T.
Originally posted by: rudder
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: OCguy
Yes, because one nut in the 90s is relevant to what right now?
Because he fit the description of what DHS is on the look out for to a T.
Tmothy McVeigh was one out of how many veterans? Not sure the number but my guess it would be an extremely low percentage.
Originally posted by: rudder
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: OCguy
Yes, because one nut in the 90s is relevant to what right now?
Because he fit the description of what DHS is on the look out for to a T.
Tmothy McVeigh was one out of how many veterans? Not sure the number but my guess it would be an extremely low percentage.
Originally posted by: retrospooty
What I mean is your attempt to paint this into a bad light. How is looking our for right wing nutjob terrorists a bad thing? Tim McVie is not the only one.
Originally posted by: OCguy
If this isnt a boogyman, I dont know what is. Lock your doors, there are war vets returning home!
So, what do the people who complained about the Bush administration spreading fear have to say?
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=94803
http://www.washingtontimes.com...-of-radicals-on-right/
WASHINGTON ? A newly unclassified Department of Homeland Security report warns against the possibility of violence by unnamed "right-wing extremists" concerned about illegal immigration, increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, abortion and the loss of U.S. sovereignty and singles out returning war veterans as particular threats"
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
The right is now determined to look even dumber than the left did for the last 8 years.
This is mountain building when there's not even a molehill to begin with.
A similar assessment of left-wing radicals completed in January was distributed to federal, state and local police agencies at that time.
"These assessments are done all the time, this is nothing unusual," Kuban said.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: retrospooty
What I mean is your attempt to paint this into a bad light. How is looking our for right wing nutjob terrorists a bad thing? Tim McVie is not the only one.
It looks bad because the criteria for being considered a right winged radical is so ludicrious and broad. Returning vets?!?!? Really?
I also find these studies interesting because they can be used for political suppression. Does anybody know if Bush had similar studies and recommendations for political left organizations?
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Text
A similar assessment of left-wing radicals completed in January was distributed to federal, state and local police agencies at that time.
"These assessments are done all the time, this is nothing unusual," Kuban said.
What is the big deal again? The left-wing equivalent came out earlier this year and I do not remember it getting much attention.
