Homeland Security Warns Against "Right-wing Radicals"

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Hacp
What about Reverend White? He was Obama's pastor for gods sake. Its almost a given that he rubbed some of his ideas onto Obama.

SILENCE, DISSENTER! SILENCE!

 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: retrospooty
That would be the FUD.

What exactly is it that you think is going on here? the DHS is on the lookout for right wing terrorists... What is wrong with that and what negative agenda do either of you think is being pushed with it?

To be on the look out for freedom fighters and opposition and freedom of expression and assembly.

When those people agreed with you you're fine with it, but turn the shoe and you're not. Who's the tyrant now? Freedom of speech, as long as you agree with me. We're taking back the language and taking back representation.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: OCguy
If this isnt a boogyman, I dont know what is. Lock your doors, there are war vets returning home!

So, what do the people who complained about the Bush administration spreading fear have to say?


http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=94803

http://www.washingtontimes.com...-of-radicals-on-right/


WASHINGTON ? A newly unclassified Department of Homeland Security report warns against the possibility of violence by unnamed "right-wing extremists" concerned about illegal immigration, increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, abortion and the loss of U.S. sovereignty and singles out returning war veterans as particular threats"

What, are you taking Winnar111's place as the right wing hate blog poster of the day now that he is banned? Is it coming to the point where you will just post anything at all to spread your FUD?

Anyhow, sorry your attempt to paint this in a bad light has failed. If there is anything I fear on this country it is the extreme right nutjobs like hte ones described in the article. Taliban... Al Qaeda... They really cant do much damage now that the element of surprise is in order - the ultra religios right wing nutjob with guns and ammo is a far more realistic threat.



Really? You think the Washington Times is a "hate-blog"?


There is only 1 poster left that constantly posts blog "articles". If you ever see me do it, please be sure and let me know ;)


It was also the leader on Drudge today, and that site has more influence on the American people and media than any other.

http://abcnews.go.com/Business...tory?id=2915370&page=1


If you feel that this was some sort of hit piece, I dont know what to tell you.


If you think that the article is false, please state the points that you think are a lie. Otherwise, you look like a leftie that is trying to discredit an OP who was just posting something that somebody else would have 3 minutes later anyway.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: OCguy
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: OCguy
If this isnt a boogyman, I dont know what is. Lock your doors, there are war vets returning home!

So, what do the people who complained about the Bush administration spreading fear have to say?


http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=94803

http://www.washingtontimes.com...-of-radicals-on-right/


WASHINGTON ? A newly unclassified Department of Homeland Security report warns against the possibility of violence by unnamed "right-wing extremists" concerned about illegal immigration, increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, abortion and the loss of U.S. sovereignty and singles out returning war veterans as particular threats"

What, are you taking Winnar111's place as the right wing hate blog poster of the day now that he is banned? Is it coming to the point where you will just post anything at all to spread your FUD?

Anyhow, sorry your attempt to paint this in a bad light has failed. If there is anything I fear on this country it is the extreme right nutjobs like hte ones described in the article. Taliban... Al Qaeda... They really cant do much damage now that the element of surprise is in order - the ultra religios right wing nutjob with guns and ammo is a far more realistic threat.



Really? You think the Washington Times is a "hate-blog"?


There is only 1 poster left that constantly posts blog "articles". If you ever see me do it, please be sure and let me know ;)


It was also the leader on Drudge today, and that site has more influence on the American people and media than any other.

http://abcnews.go.com/Business...tory?id=2915370&page=1


If you feel that this was some sort of hit piece, I dont know what to tell you.


If you think that the article is false, please state the points that you think are a lie. Otherwise, you look like a leftie that is trying to discredit an OP who was just posting something that somebody else would have 3 minutes later anyway.

What I mean is your attempt to paint this into a bad light. How is looking our for right wing nutjob terrorists a bad thing? Tim McVie is not the only one.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: retrospooty
That would be the FUD.

What exactly is it that you think is going on here? the DHS is on the lookout for right wing terrorists... What is wrong with that and what negative agenda do either of you think is being pushed with it?

To be on the look out for freedom fighters and opposition and freedom of expression and assembly.

When those people agreed with you you're fine with it, but turn the shoe and you're not. Who's the tyrant now? Freedom of speech, as long as you agree with me. We're taking back the language and taking back representation.

What the hell are you talking about? How is being on the lookout for violent extremists a bad thing? No one is going after "freedom fighters" or anyone using "freedom of expression". They are talking about Tim McVie types that practice violence... Unless you are trying to call people like McVie a hero - in which case I suggest you leave this country, becasue its not meant for you.
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
The right is now determined to look even dumber than the left did for the last 8 years.

This is mountain building when there's not even a molehill to begin with.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: spidey07
So what is the new monkey going to do about it?

That's RACIST!!!


;)

LOL.. I dunno about that, but has anyone ever told you that your sig makes you sound like a total asshat ? IF not, let me be the first.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Something to ponder...

When the Democrats had complete control of the government in the 60s it was the radical left that was setting off bombs and killing people.

And then the government swung almost completely to the right throughout the 1980s and it became the right that started setting off bombs and killing people. (Oklahoma, abortion clinics + doctors)

So now that the left has taken over could we see the radical left reemerge?? Or is that trend done and over with??


BTW I think the story is correct. The chances of another Waco or Ruby Ridge are much much higher under a Democrat like Obama than under a Republican.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Something to ponder...

When the Democrats had complete control of the government in the 60s it was the radical left that was setting off bombs and killing people.

And then the government swung almost completely to the right throughout the 1980s and it became the right that started setting off bombs and killing people. (Oklahoma, abortion clinics + doctors)

So now that the left has taken over could we see the radical left reemerge?? Or is that trend done and over with??


BTW I think the story is correct. The chances of another Waco or Ruby Ridge are much much higher under a Democrat like Obama than under a Republican.

Except groups like ELF are just emerging. And it will only get worse with blow-hards like Al Gore running around trying to get federal and private funds for "studies."


First they spray-paint some hummers and get away with it. Im not going to speculate out load what may be next, but I have some ideas.
 

Pocatello

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,754
2
76
In the 90s there were these black helicopters flying around...according to some folks. Never mind that the US Army flies black helicopters.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: Modelworks
The threat I think the government should watch out for are disgruntled employees and people who have no work. I am really surprised that nobody tried to shoot people like Madoff. I heard a guy on the radio say that if he lost his job and couldn't feed his family , he was going to grab his gun and head to the local grocery store with other unemployed people and take what they needed. That is the kind of thinking they need to watch out for.

There was tight security around Madoff.

They had snipers etc on buildings when he was going-to-coming-from court appearences (and other measures).

Fern

 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: tweaker2
Originally posted by: Fern
Quite likely because the left-wing radical report hasn't been reported by the MSM.

OTOH, the one against right wing radicals has been widely reported. For some reason it has been all over the news.

We've even had threads here about it before (i.e., this is a repost but the search function isn't working for me ATM).

Fern

Seeing as if the sources aren't presently known(?) concerning the distribution of the right wing radical report, it seems plausible to me that "the spreading around" of the right wing radical report could have come from the right wing radicals themselves attacking the report to defend themselves.

Well, that's ummm... one version. Regardless, I'd like to see something on the report about left-wing radicals.

Does it say that they sport Obama bumper stickers and hang out on computer tech sites posting left-wing stuff under pseudonyms?

Ya know, the kind that bitch about terrorists' civil rights and FISA yet applaud the surveillance of US citizens with Ron Paul & NRA bumper stickers?

Fern
 

Siddhartha

Lifer
Oct 17, 1999
12,505
3
81
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Something to ponder...

When the Democrats had complete control of the government in the 60s it was the radical left that was setting off bombs and killing people.

And then the government swung almost completely to the right throughout the 1980s and it became the right that started setting off bombs and killing people. (Oklahoma, abortion clinics + doctors)

So now that the left has taken over could we see the radical left reemerge?? Or is that trend done and over with??


BTW I think the story is correct. The chances of another Waco or Ruby Ridge are much much higher under a Democrat like Obama than under a Republican.

The Viet Nam war drove alot of the 1960's radicalism.

Roe vs Wade drove alot of the 1980's radicalism.

I think the Federal government has learned alot from the outcomes of the Ruby Ridge and Waco sieges. Has there been a repeat of that kind of disaster in the last 15 years?

 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: OCguy
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit


Does the name Timothy McVeigh ring a bell?

Yes, because one nut in the 90s is relevant to what right now?

Because he fit the description of what DHS is on the look out for to a T.

Tmothy McVeigh was one out of how many veterans? Not sure the number but my guess it would be an extremely low percentage.
 

poohbear

Platinum Member
Mar 11, 2003
2,284
5
81
"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: rudder
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: OCguy
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit


Does the name Timothy McVeigh ring a bell?

Yes, because one nut in the 90s is relevant to what right now?

Because he fit the description of what DHS is on the look out for to a T.

Tmothy McVeigh was one out of how many veterans? Not sure the number but my guess it would be an extremely low percentage.

Whats your point?

The fact is that the violent terrorist that would harm another human being is just a small fraction of a percent of the billions of Muslims out there... Does that mean we should stop being on the lookout for Muslim Terrorists?
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Originally posted by: rudder
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: OCguy
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit


Does the name Timothy McVeigh ring a bell?

Yes, because one nut in the 90s is relevant to what right now?

Because he fit the description of what DHS is on the look out for to a T.

Tmothy McVeigh was one out of how many veterans? Not sure the number but my guess it would be an extremely low percentage.

Don't forget about Rambo.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: retrospooty

What I mean is your attempt to paint this into a bad light. How is looking our for right wing nutjob terrorists a bad thing? Tim McVie is not the only one.

It looks bad because the criteria for being considered a right winged radical is so ludicrious and broad. Returning vets?!?!? Really?

I also find these studies interesting because they can be used for political suppression. Does anybody know if Bush had similar studies and recommendations for political left organizations?
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,809
33,423
136
Originally posted by: OCguy
If this isnt a boogyman, I dont know what is. Lock your doors, there are war vets returning home!

So, what do the people who complained about the Bush administration spreading fear have to say?


http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=94803

http://www.washingtontimes.com...-of-radicals-on-right/


WASHINGTON ? A newly unclassified Department of Homeland Security report warns against the possibility of violence by unnamed "right-wing extremists" concerned about illegal immigration, increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, abortion and the loss of U.S. sovereignty and singles out returning war veterans as particular threats"

I'll explain it to you...

Nut in Pittsburgh listening to right wing blowhards telling him Obama is going to take all his guns, kills 3 cops.

Bush - WMD in Iraq...mushroom cloud...

Get it??
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
The right is now determined to look even dumber than the left did for the last 8 years.

This is mountain building when there's not even a molehill to begin with.

Finally, we agree on something.

For chrissakes, DHS did a pretty fair and balanced job. Left-wing nut job threat assessment in Jan 09, right-wing nut job assessment in Apr 09. I think it's quite fair to say that DHS is looking for nut jobs of all persuasions.

And so frankly, this entire discussion is interesting only in the manner in which it draws the paranoid nut jobs to the fire.
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
Text
A similar assessment of left-wing radicals completed in January was distributed to federal, state and local police agencies at that time.

"These assessments are done all the time, this is nothing unusual," Kuban said.

What is the big deal again? The left-wing equivalent came out earlier this year and I do not remember it getting much attention.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: retrospooty

What I mean is your attempt to paint this into a bad light. How is looking our for right wing nutjob terrorists a bad thing? Tim McVie is not the only one.

It looks bad because the criteria for being considered a right winged radical is so ludicrious and broad. Returning vets?!?!? Really?

I also find these studies interesting because they can be used for political suppression. Does anybody know if Bush had similar studies and recommendations for political left organizations?

I don't believe the report concluded that returning vets were right-wing radicals, only that RWR's would try and recruit them and/or radicalize them.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Text
A similar assessment of left-wing radicals completed in January was distributed to federal, state and local police agencies at that time.

"These assessments are done all the time, this is nothing unusual," Kuban said.

What is the big deal again? The left-wing equivalent came out earlier this year and I do not remember it getting much attention.

The resident right-wing wackos are MAKING it a big deal. Oh the outrage! :roll:
 

BMW540I6speed

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2005
1,055
0
0
Is it any wonder that when you all these politicians and right wing blowhards and Fox news talking heads, saying the sky is falling, Unfortunately, we don't have too many in the media pointing out that the statements of people like congresswomen Michelle Bachmann and Glenn Beck are pure paranoid fantasy. Instead they have acted as a bullhorn for the chicken little brigades notion that we are being overun by godless commies and other boogymen.

The usual worry about an impending 'New World Order.'"

Those worriers are just getting their panties in a wad over the past. The New World Order arrived in America a while back in the form of corporations transferring countless U.S. jobs to foreign shores. The New World Order is called global capitalism, and it's here to stay.

Maybe the Canadians carve out a portion of Manitoba for them? They can sales tax themselves into prosperity. They can tea bag themselves all night long.