Holy crap this works!!!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JackHomer

Senior member
Dec 20, 2002
235
0
0
Originally posted by: RedRooster
Originally posted by: jjones
Originally posted by: Fausto
This is YET ANOTHER compelling argument for the introduction of the :cookie; icon.
I have to agree. And these kind of threads come up all too often not to have a :cookie; in our repertory of emoticons. :p

So, if this "cookie" icon were to be implemented, what would you suggest it look like? I agree on its necessity, however it's universal representation should be explored and agreed upon before going forth.

It would totally have to be chocolate chip, no doubt, Chips a hoy style!!
 

sillymofo

Banned
Aug 11, 2003
5,817
2
0
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: TuxDave
I'm completely confused... why are the fans going in opposite directions?
Ever seen how a turbo props work?
please explain.
Depends on the RPMs of the fans, it works almost in a way that a turbine compressor would work. So if some how they stack another fan on top of this, which I will, there will be more air flow through the heatsink.
 

Shawn

Lifer
Apr 20, 2003
32,236
53
91
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Another thing I noticed also, my main HSF is now a cool >1000 RMPs less than it was previously spinning.

thats cause you got them going it the opposite direction
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: TuxDave
I'm completely confused... why are the fans going in opposite directions?
Ever seen how a turbo props work?
please explain.
Depends on the RPMs of the fans, it works almost in a way that a turbine compressor would work. So if some how they stack another fan on top of this, which I will, there will be more air flow through the heatsink.
When people say "opposite directions" ... are we talking sucking vs. blowing or clockwise vs. counterclockwise ?
 

sillymofo

Banned
Aug 11, 2003
5,817
2
0
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: TuxDave
I'm completely confused... why are the fans going in opposite directions?
Ever seen how a turbo props work?
please explain.
Depends on the RPMs of the fans, it works almost in a way that a turbine compressor would work. So if some how they stack another fan on top of this, which I will, there will be more air flow through the heatsink.
When people say "opposite directions" ... are we talking sucking vs. blowing or clockwise vs. counterclockwise ?
The airflow direction is still the same, into the CPU, the only difference is that the fans are spinning in opposite directions, creating a less turbulance and more efficient airflow.
 

TuxDave

Lifer
Oct 8, 2002
10,571
3
71
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: TuxDave
I'm completely confused... why are the fans going in opposite directions?
Ever seen how a turbo props work?
please explain.
Depends on the RPMs of the fans, it works almost in a way that a turbine compressor would work. So if some how they stack another fan on top of this, which I will, there will be more air flow through the heatsink.
When people say "opposite directions" ... are we talking sucking vs. blowing or clockwise vs. counterclockwise ?
The airflow direction is still the same, into the CPU, the only difference is that the fans are spinning in opposite directions, creating a less turbulance and more efficient airflow.

Ooooh.... I was thinking that they were blowing in opposite directions. Ok, makes more sense then. :thumbsup:
 

HiTek21

Diamond Member
Jul 4, 2002
4,391
1
0
Originally posted by: jjones
Originally posted by: Fausto
This is YET ANOTHER compelling argument for the introduction of the :cookie; icon.
I have to agree. And these kind of threads come up all too often not to have a :cookie; in our repertory of emoticons. :p

For now
 

Vortex22

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2000
4,976
1
81
Originally posted by: HiTek21
Originally posted by: jjones
Originally posted by: Fausto
This is YET ANOTHER compelling argument for the introduction of the :cookie; icon.
I have to agree. And these kind of threads come up all too often not to have a :cookie; in our repertory of emoticons. :p

For now

It would be better if the thing in his hand actually looked like a cookie rather than a turd.