That's the thing though what would you say if you were only 15 or 16 (remember how horny you were then... ) and some grown woman wanted to rock your world?
I doubt you'd be doing anything but thanking your lucky stars and keeping your mouth shut so you don't say anything to make her change her mind.
Exactly, I wouldn't. Because women are different from men and girls are different than boys (at least in the general sense, there are of course people that are not the norm). I don't apply the same logic because it's not the same situation.
Contrast that with the charismatic and attractive male teachers at the school. When they walk in the classroom the girl fools in there want to bang him too. But not because they want to hit it and move on. They want to have his baby, be with him emotionally, blah fing blah blah blah.
so she gets charged for sodomy...she gets F'd in the A, but gets charged for it? talk about being bent over...
But feminists insist that women like sex just as much as men. So shouldn't we apply the same standard if a male teacher(older male) is banging teenagers?
Way to fuck up a fairly entertaining thread with half-wit political rantings brah.
JHFC.
What's sad is that every dad is secretly going Yeah son! while wearing the concerned/angry look around the wife. The moms will be all up in arms over another woman (who is actual competition to them unlike the girls the son would normally bring around) messing around on their turf, whining how this woman preyed on their poor innocent baby boy, blah blah blah. And the boys will instantly be The Man at their school and recite a hundred times or so to the friends how awesome it was to hit that.
The system in the meantime will spend a stupid amount of money prosecuting this woman for letting the boys hit a way higher quality piece of ass that they'd normally have never got for at least another decade (if ever) and for making them instantly raise to the top of the social structure at school.
Fing ridiculous.
Chuck
But but liberalism has been telling us that men and women are exactly the same.
.
The point isnt whether or not the victims enjoyed it. Its that an adult used their position of trust and power to manipulate minors.
http://www.keprtv.com/news/local/De...-sex-abuse-involving-teen-boys-182557371.html
Once again this begs the question: Why not ME?!?
You're making my point for me.
To a group of 14-whatever year old males: Hey, want to F that model over there? Them: Can we go twice?
To a group of 14-whatever year old females: Hey, want to F that model over there? Them: Will anyone find out? Does he love me? Can I have his kids? What will my parents think of me? Etc. etc. etc. (and yes, a lot would privately, and many publically, say Can I go twice).
The chances are so remote that she had to manipulate any of these boys as to make the case against her pointless.
Chuck
You're making my point for me.
To a group of 14-whatever year old males: Hey, want to F that model over there? Them: Can we go twice?
To a group of 14-whatever year old females: Hey, want to F that model over there? Them: Will anyone find out? Does he love me? Can I have his kids? What will my parents think of me? Etc. etc. etc. (and yes, a lot would privately, and many publically, say Can I go twice).
The chances are so remote that she had to manipulate any of these boys as to make the case against her pointless.
Chuck
What's sad is that every dad is secretly going Yeah son! while wearing the concerned/angry look around the wife. The moms will be all up in arms over another woman (who is actual competition to them unlike the girls the son would normally bring around) messing around on their turf, whining how this woman preyed on their poor innocent baby boy, blah blah blah. And the boys will instantly be The Man at their school and recite a hundred times or so to the friends how awesome it was to hit that.
The system in the meantime will spend a stupid amount of money prosecuting this woman for letting the boys hit a way higher quality piece of ass that they'd normally have never got for at least another decade (if ever) and for making them instantly raise to the top of the social structure at school.
Fing ridiculous.
Chuck
14 year olds are not allowed to consent to sex. Its rape.
No you are missing the point.
It is precisely because it is so easy that we should never let it happen.
While a teenage boy would LOVE to fuck anything that has a pulse and isn't revolting that doesn't make it ok.
Teenage boys are no men, snip
14 year olds are not allowed to consent to sex. Its rape.
See my above to nehalem.
Chuck
Can they consent to eating? Because that's about as natural as boys wanting to F anything of the opposite sex given the chance (yeck, as natural as men wanting to F almost anything ((in relation to themselves)) of the opposite sex given the chance).
I'm not saying she shouldn't be punished. Losing her job and basically being unemployable in her field for the rest of her life would be punishment enough I'd think. You're saying we need to spend public time and money prosecuting her for doing what every boy and man dreams about? That seems....very irrational....
Chuck
Food rapes hungry kids, news at 11...
Either teenagers are capable of consenting to sex, or they are not.
No thanks, the parts you snipped is why your answer wouldn't work.
Perchance you are retarded enough to think that a young boy cannot be emotionally hurt, fall in love or be used but that is your retard mind speaking LOUD because all of psychology will tell you that boys are MORE impressionable and likely to get psychological problems by this than girls are.
Either teenagers are capable of consenting to sex, or they are not.
I find it funny that you are arguing that teenage boys are the ones capable of consenting when typically girls are considered to mature faster.
Maybe we should just put girls into burkhas until marriage to protect their virginity?
There are 13 year old girls who consent to sex with 40 year old men...
No problemo, food rapes hungry kids..
Not old enough to do anything in an adult world but can consent to sex just fine per chucky2's assessment.
Luckily more intelligent people than you make up the laws of our society by known factors, not just the idea that as a 13 year old they would have loved to drive, fuck, drink and do drugs.
Oh, they can. But they'll get over it, will be a good life lesson for them. Unless they're a pussboy of the highest order, they'll be just fine, better for it. In the meantime they can tag that sh1t out of it.
Except I've already said, girls are different than boys. Try again.
I see this less about consent and more about if a 14 year old needs permission to drink a glass of water. Or to eat food. Do we need their parents to consent to that or are those things that the body and mind naturally want and thus we don't freak out when the 14 year old boy gets a drink from the water fountain? It's the same in this case. Boys are different than girls, they are wired differently. A 14 year old boy isn't going to be mind F'd if his teacher sleeps with him. A 14 year old girl, especially after the parents and society get their spin on it in, will have mental trauma.
I just view it as a natural double standard, I'm not willing to go down the prosecution road for something pretty much every man willingly wants and would take if Mother Society wasn't there poking its nose into everything.
