Holy Crap! Obama flips lid on Bush-era anti-terror history...

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Your lack of comprehension is astounding, Harvey. I was right, you ARE a dumbass.

Now go troll someone else with your macro idiocy.

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken in this thread, 03/05/2009 12:10 PM PST

There is nothing to apologize to you for.

Somehow, that doesn't square with:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken in this thread, 3/04/2009 08:03 PM PST

Harvey, if you did read those memos then I'll have to apologize.

You can't have it both ways. The above two self-contradictory statements are enough to prove you're a liar, but if you need more, read the previous versions of this repost where I actually proved I read the memos, which means I actually proved you're a lying POS.

Troll, troll, troll your boat..

Ya know, you could have copped to a simple mistake, but instead, you just kept lying, denying and avoiding that simple fact. The fact that you're so demonstrably and blatantly wrong about the Constitution and the law is pathetic, but at least, you're consistant about being a self-centered, lying egomaniac.

I can continue to post your self-contradictory bullshit as many times as you want to deny it. It's all right here in the same thread. Since you continue to quote them, thanks for helping to make my point. :laugh:
Keep up the dishonesty with your parsing of my statements and removing them from context, troll. It's amusing. Pathetically amusing, but amusing nonetheless.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
67
91
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Keep up the dishonesty with your parsing of my statements and removing them from context, troll. It's amusing. Pathetically amusing, but amusing nonetheless.

Out of context, my ass. I've quoted your posts in this very thread. Anyone can easily scroll back to find any of them, including any of them to find any "context" you think I didn't include.

I'll get off this point and stop reposting your lie about me as soon as you cop to it. Then, we can get back to proving how wrong you are about your horrible misunderstanding of the significance of memos, the Constitution and the law, which I and others have already pointed out.

Or you can keep it up, and I'll continue to repost YOUR own lies. Your choice. For now, that's track we're on so... < cue drumroll >... Here's TastesLikeCOWARD in his own words:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken in this thread, 03/05/2009 12:10 PM PST

There is nothing to apologize to you for.

Somehow, that doesn't square with:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken in this thread, 3/04/2009 08:03 PM PST

Harvey, if you did read those memos then I'll have to apologize.

You can't have it both ways. The above two self-contradictory statements are enough to prove you're a liar, but if you need more, read the previous versions of this repost where I actually proved I read the memos, which means I actually proved you're a lying POS.
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Keep up the dishonesty with your parsing of my statements and removing them from context, troll. It's amusing. Pathetically amusing, but amusing nonetheless.

Out of context, my ass. I've quoted your posts in this very thread. Anyone can easily scroll back to find any of them, including any of them to find any "context" you think I didn't include.

I'll get off this point and stop reposting your lie about me as soon as you cop to it. Then, we can get back to proving how wrong you are about your horrible misunderstanding of the significance of memos, the Constitution and the law, which I and others have already pointed out.

Or you can keep it up, and I'll continue to repost YOUR own lies. Your choice. For now, that's track we're on so... < cue drumroll >... Here's TastesLikeCOWARD in his own words:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken in this thread, 03/05/2009 12:10 PM PST

There is nothing to apologize to you for.

Somehow, that doesn't square with:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken in this thread, 3/04/2009 08:03 PM PST

Harvey, if you did read those memos then I'll have to apologize.

You can't have it both ways. The above two self-contradictory statements are enough to prove you're a liar, but if you need more, read the previous versions of this repost where I actually proved I read the memos, which means I actually proved you're a lying POS.
No doubt the crowd in P&N is getting bored of your antics, Harvey. I've already explained it to you but you just bull on ahead obliviously. If you have anything more to say to me about this issue, take it to PM and save everyone else the misery.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
67
91
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Keep up the dishonesty with your parsing of my statements and removing them from context, troll. It's amusing. Pathetically amusing, but amusing nonetheless.

Out of context, my ass. I've quoted your posts in this very thread. Anyone can easily scroll back to find any of them, including any of them to find any "context" you think I didn't include.

I'll get off this point and stop reposting your lie about me as soon as you cop to it. Then, we can get back to proving how wrong you are about your horrible misunderstanding of the significance of memos, the Constitution and the law, which I and others have already pointed out.

Or you can keep it up, and I'll continue to repost YOUR own lies. Your choice. For now, that's track we're on so... < cue drumroll >... Here's TastesLikeCOWARD in his own words:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken in this thread, 03/05/2009 12:10 PM PST

There is nothing to apologize to you for.

Somehow, that doesn't square with:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken in this thread, 3/04/2009 08:03 PM PST

Harvey, if you did read those memos then I'll have to apologize.

You can't have it both ways. The above two self-contradictory statements are enough to prove you're a liar, but if you need more, read the previous versions of this repost where I actually proved I read the memos, which means I actually proved you're a lying POS.

No doubt the crowd in P&N is getting bored of your antics, Harvey. I've already explained it to you but you just bull on ahead obliviously. If you have anything more to say to me about this issue, take it to PM and save everyone else the misery.

The only "crowd" that fits your definition comprises only the jackass at your keyboard. But keep reposting quotes of your own lies. That stops as soon as you cop to the fact that you lied about me... or you could stop posting, entirely. That would really please the crowd that concerns you so much. :light: :D
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Keep up the dishonesty with your parsing of my statements and removing them from context, troll. It's amusing. Pathetically amusing, but amusing nonetheless.

Out of context, my ass. I've quoted your posts in this very thread. Anyone can easily scroll back to find any of them, including any of them to find any "context" you think I didn't include.

I'll get off this point and stop reposting your lie about me as soon as you cop to it. Then, we can get back to proving how wrong you are about your horrible misunderstanding of the significance of memos, the Constitution and the law, which I and others have already pointed out.

Or you can keep it up, and I'll continue to repost YOUR own lies. Your choice. For now, that's track we're on so... < cue drumroll >... Here's TastesLikeCOWARD in his own words:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken in this thread, 03/05/2009 12:10 PM PST

There is nothing to apologize to you for.

Somehow, that doesn't square with:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken in this thread, 3/04/2009 08:03 PM PST

Harvey, if you did read those memos then I'll have to apologize.

You can't have it both ways. The above two self-contradictory statements are enough to prove you're a liar, but if you need more, read the previous versions of this repost where I actually proved I read the memos, which means I actually proved you're a lying POS.

No doubt the crowd in P&N is getting bored of your antics, Harvey. I've already explained it to you but you just bull on ahead obliviously. If you have anything more to say to me about this issue, take it to PM and save everyone else the misery.

The only "crowd" that fits your definition comprises only the jackass at your keyboard. But keep reposting quotes of your own lies. That stops as soon as you cop to the fact that you lied about me... or you could stop posting, entirely. That would really please the crowd that concerns you so much. :light: :D
No doubt they'd like that. That crowd crows about free speech and rights and choice, but can't stand anyone that doesn't spout their talking points and toe their party line. They also believe that their majority in this forum gives them the right to take a dump on anyone that doesn't see things their way. In fact, you're one of those closed-minded types yourself, if not the commander in chief.

That said...Anyone here is free to go back and see what I wrote in its ENTIRETY, not the part you jerked out of context. So if you want to continue your infantile game of playing the tool, go right ahead. Makes no nevermind to me if you want to go on making a flippin ass of yourself in here. It surely wouldn't be the first time and no doubt won't be the last.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
People already know you as somebody who thought GWB was the Messiah!!
So you`ll will always be loyal to GWB to ther very end.....so sad!!
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
67
91
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Keep up the dishonesty with your parsing of my statements and removing them from context, troll. It's amusing. Pathetically amusing, but amusing nonetheless.

Out of context, my ass. I've quoted your posts in this very thread. Anyone can easily scroll back to find any of them, including any of them to find any "context" you think I didn't include.

I'll get off this point and stop reposting your lie about me as soon as you cop to it. Then, we can get back to proving how wrong you are about your horrible misunderstanding of the significance of memos, the Constitution and the law, which I and others have already pointed out.

Or you can keep it up, and I'll continue to repost YOUR own lies. Your choice. For now, that's track we're on so... < cue drumroll >... Here's TastesLikeCOWARD in his own words:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken in this thread, 03/05/2009 12:10 PM PST

There is nothing to apologize to you for.

Somehow, that doesn't square with:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken in this thread, 3/04/2009 08:03 PM PST

Harvey, if you did read those memos then I'll have to apologize.

You can't have it both ways. The above two self-contradictory statements are enough to prove you're a liar, but if you need more, read the previous versions of this repost where I actually proved I read the memos, which means I actually proved you're a lying POS.

No doubt the crowd in P&N is getting bored of your antics, Harvey. I've already explained it to you but you just bull on ahead obliviously. If you have anything more to say to me about this issue, take it to PM and save everyone else the misery.

The only "crowd" that fits your definition comprises only the jackass at your keyboard. But keep reposting quotes of your own lies. That stops as soon as you cop to the fact that you lied about me... or you could stop posting, entirely. That would really please the crowd that concerns you so much. :light: :D

No doubt they'd like that. That crowd crows about free speech and rights and choice, but can't stand anyone that doesn't spout their talking points and toe their party line. They also believe that their majority in this forum gives them the right to take a dump on anyone that doesn't see things their way. In fact, you're one of those closed-minded types yourself, if not the commander in chief.

That said...Anyone here is free to go back and see what I wrote in its ENTIRETY, not the part you jerked out of context. So if you want to continue your infantile game of playing the tool, go right ahead. Makes no nevermind to me if you want to go on making a flippin ass of yourself in here. It surely wouldn't be the first time and no doubt won't be the last.

OMFGWTFBBQ!!! TastesLikeCOWARD actually agrees with me. :shocked: Anyone can, in fact, go back and review his LIES in context. That won't change the fact that he lied about whether I read the memos or that he's too TastesLikeChickenshit to admit that simple fact.

And thanks for quoting your own lies yet again. You make it so easy. :thumbsup: :cool: