- Jan 26, 2000
- 50,879
- 4,268
- 126
WikiLeaks founder Assange suspected of sex crimes
Interpol has issued an international warrant at the request of a Swedish court for the arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in connection with alleged sex crimes.
The Stockholm Criminal Court last week issued an international arrest warrant for Assange on probable cause, saying he is suspected of rape, sexual molestation and illegal use of force. Sweden asked Interpol to post a "Red Notice" after a judge approved a motion to bring him into custody.
The arrest warrant stems from allegations made against Assange, who is Australian, in August. In a November, Assange's lawyer said the sex-crime charges stem from consensual sexual relationships his client had with two women.
Or maybe, just maybe he did rape somebody?
Some animals are more equal than others. Didn't you get that memo? I'll go ahead and send you another copy before one of the more equal animals sends you to the knackers.Link? Don't doubt its true though.
Funny how its the end of the world when it comes to government privacy but everything is fine when snooping on millions of Americans.
Link? Don't doubt its true though.
Funny how its the end of the world when it comes to government privacy but everything is fine when snooping on millions of Americans.
Doubt it. One of the women first said it was consensual and then met with the other and now they both say it's rape. It's likely they are being paid, threatened, or one of them is an agent.
Also, in related news:
Wikileaks about to pwn a major bank.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Bank-...7.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=5&asset=&ccode=
There's nothing reasonable about Julian Assange.
Early next year, Julian Assange says, a major American bank will suddenly find itself turned inside out. Tens of thousands of its internal documents will be exposed on Wikileaks.org with no polite requests for executives’ response or other forewarnings. The data dump will lay bare the finance firm’s secrets on the Web for every customer, every competitor, every regulator to examine and pass judgment on.
The best thing about the whole ordeal are the neocons who dont trust government are enraged that government secrets are out. lololololol. It just highlights the stupidity in such a large way.
You do realize that two of those four things are duties of any government (i.e. enforcing the law and defending the citizenry), right? A bit ridiculous to lump those in, and downright idiotic to say that those are less legitimate concerns than social security. While I agree that the neocons as you describe them are hopeless, foaming at the mouth and losing track of reality is hardly a good way to defeat them.No my friend when a neocon sees "big government tyranny" he see's things like Social Security, improvements in wages and working conditions and education, etc basically working for the people. He as no problem with old fashioned uses of government, prisons, executions, domestic surveillance, and of course war.
He as no problem with old fashioned uses of government, prisons, executions, domestic surveillance, and of course war.
You do realize that two of those four things are duties of any government (i.e. enforcing the law and defending the citizenry), right? A bit ridiculous to lump those in, and downright idiotic to say that those are less legitimate concerns than social security. While I agree that the neocons as you describe them are hopeless, foaming at the mouth and losing track of reality is hardly a good way to defeat them.
Doubt it. One of the women first said it was consensual and then met with the other and now they both say it's rape. It's likely they are being paid, threatened, or one of them is an agent.
Also, in related news:
Wikileaks about to pwn a major bank.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Bank-...7.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=5&asset=&ccode=
You do realize that two of those four things are duties of any government (i.e. enforcing the law and defending the citizenry), right? A bit ridiculous to lump those in, and downright idiotic to say that those are less legitimate concerns than social security. While I agree that the neocons as you describe them are hopeless, foaming at the mouth and losing track of reality is hardly a good way to defeat them.
