- Aug 10, 2002
- 5,847
- 154
- 106
I own some property which is governed and subject to HOA bylaws. This is rental investment property that I originally bought for my first home but moved out and now rent it out. The problem here is that my association has been extremely lax about informing property owners about the bylaws as well as enforcing them. I got a notice the other day in the mail that stated all leases between property owners and tenants must also have a rider from the association (an addendum to the lease) attached and this must be signed by the tenant and landlord and sent to the association office. It just makes sure the tenant is aware of the association rules and uses its facilities appropriately as well as a few other minor points.
Now I don't have a problem getting my tenant to sign this rider to the lease, as a matter of fact he already did when I met with him last night. The other issue that concerns me is that there is a penalty for non-compliance. Every month that my tenant has not signed this rider to the lease, the owner (me) on the hook for penalties which will accrue every month. Admittedly I did not know this and regardless of whose fault it is, other property owners are in the same boat as me. We all figure that the office must have done an audit and discovered vast amount of rented properties and no riders signed for those leases. Many of the tenants here I've spoken were also approached by their landlords and asked to sigh the riders, same exact situation as myself and my tenant.
Now, I'm faced with a dilemma. The association also wants a copy of the lease between my tenant and I. And on that lease it will show that my tenant's term started back in December. Therefore, I have been 7 months out of compliance and potentially liable for 7 months worth of fines (hundreds, maybe thousands of dollars of fines). The evidence of my non-compliance is right there on our lease. I am thinking of modifying the lease signed between my tenant and I and giving a copy of this phony lease to the association office, showing that the lease started this month, in effect erasing my time of non-compliance.
Is it false and dishonest? Yes it is. Will it work? I'm not sure. Is it my fault I did not know about this laxly enforced, obscure rule or is it the association's fault for failing to notify and enforce it? I'm not sure about that and I find other owners are in the same boat as me. They have lawyers on retainer and I don't and if this evidence can be swept under the rug with no consequences to me, I'd like to do that. Ideally, this is a fight I'd like to avoid with the association. Therefore, please lets not turn this into a witch hunt or moral bashing thread. I'm hoping this thread can stay civil and I'm looking for opinions or for someone to tell me if this is a good idea or if it will get me in potentially deeper trouble. I haven't told my tenant about this either, wondering if I need his cooperation. Thanks...
Now I don't have a problem getting my tenant to sign this rider to the lease, as a matter of fact he already did when I met with him last night. The other issue that concerns me is that there is a penalty for non-compliance. Every month that my tenant has not signed this rider to the lease, the owner (me) on the hook for penalties which will accrue every month. Admittedly I did not know this and regardless of whose fault it is, other property owners are in the same boat as me. We all figure that the office must have done an audit and discovered vast amount of rented properties and no riders signed for those leases. Many of the tenants here I've spoken were also approached by their landlords and asked to sigh the riders, same exact situation as myself and my tenant.
Now, I'm faced with a dilemma. The association also wants a copy of the lease between my tenant and I. And on that lease it will show that my tenant's term started back in December. Therefore, I have been 7 months out of compliance and potentially liable for 7 months worth of fines (hundreds, maybe thousands of dollars of fines). The evidence of my non-compliance is right there on our lease. I am thinking of modifying the lease signed between my tenant and I and giving a copy of this phony lease to the association office, showing that the lease started this month, in effect erasing my time of non-compliance.
Is it false and dishonest? Yes it is. Will it work? I'm not sure. Is it my fault I did not know about this laxly enforced, obscure rule or is it the association's fault for failing to notify and enforce it? I'm not sure about that and I find other owners are in the same boat as me. They have lawyers on retainer and I don't and if this evidence can be swept under the rug with no consequences to me, I'd like to do that. Ideally, this is a fight I'd like to avoid with the association. Therefore, please lets not turn this into a witch hunt or moral bashing thread. I'm hoping this thread can stay civil and I'm looking for opinions or for someone to tell me if this is a good idea or if it will get me in potentially deeper trouble. I haven't told my tenant about this either, wondering if I need his cooperation. Thanks...
