Originally posted by: Mermaidman
PPO is my preference--more freedom, more flexibility, much less hassle needed for specialty care! Your choice will depend on your needs. If you very seldom require healthcare, go with cheaper HMO.
Originally posted by: PunDogg
what does PPO stand more??
Dogg
As you know, these numbers will vary. My company offers two levels of PPO coverage. I chose the cheaper premium option. THere is a $25 copay per visit. The deductible is $350 for in-network and $1250 for non-network. Coverage is 80% in-network and 50% non-network.Originally posted by: CtK
can someone with PPO give me an example about the 20% co pay and the $500 deductible
thanks!!
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
The whole point of health insurance, for me, is the max yearly deductible. PPOs, generally, have co-pays for hospitalization of 20% which can easily become an astonomical figure.
Originally posted by: cjchaps
I have a PPO with a 600 decductable. What that means is that anytime you see a doctor, you will pay for it until you reach that 600 dollars. For instance, if you see the doctor twice, and the totals were 500, you would pay that 500 out of pocket. If you have a total of 3 office visits which cost 750, then you will pay $600 and the ppo will pay 150.
Originally posted by: spidey07
avoid HMO at all costs. even if a PPO is twice the price.
If there are any medical professionals on this board I'm sure they would agree.
biggest problem is they send you to whatever doctor is the cheapest - and you generally get what you pay for.
Originally posted by: cheapbidder01
HMO is only good till you have an emergency. Then you'll have to wait till you get a hold of your doctor and get his opinion before going to the emergency room or risk the chance of paying for the visit yourself. With PPO, you get to make the decision whether or not its an emergency and you'd be covered no matter what.
So you just have to ask yourself, am I smart enough to determine when I need emergency care?
Answer:
Yes = PPO
NO = HMO.
😉
Its cheaper with HMO because in times of emergencies, ( the more costly times) you may end up paying for it yourself. That's the risk you take.
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
The whole point of health insurance, for me, is the max yearly deductible. PPOs, generally, have co-pays for hospitalization of 20% which can easily become an astonomical figure.
Affirmative. PPO are handy if you want to pick and choose your doctos, but that 80% crap is likely to leave you pretty screwed if something serious happens to you. PPO would be ideal even with that deductable if it covered 100%. Assuming it does not, get the HMO. 20% of a whole freaking lot of money is still a whole freaking lot of money.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
The whole point of health insurance, for me, is the max yearly deductible. PPOs, generally, have co-pays for hospitalization of 20% which can easily become an astonomical figure.
Affirmative. PPO are handy if you want to pick and choose your doctos, but that 80% crap is likely to leave you pretty screwed if something serious happens to you. PPO would be ideal even with that deductable if it covered 100%. Assuming it does not, get the HMO. 20% of a whole freaking lot of money is still a whole freaking lot of money.
that's what the out of pocket maximum is for. You can't go over a certain amount per year no matter what.