lopri
Elite Member
- Jul 27, 2002
- 13,316
- 690
- 126
Really, I can't imagine what kind of super iPad 1 the OP has.. My iPad can't go more than 30 minutes before crashing thanks to its paltry 256 MB RAM. Can't even hold two taps open in safari so it has to refresh every single page. Go more than 3 pages and mix in external links for pdf, youtube, etc. and you are almost always guaranteed to see crashes.
I don't use facebook or twitter, etc., so can't comment on that but as far as HBO Go and NYTimes, it's the same story. On iPad 1, you try anything other than straight forward viewing it crashes. Heck, it still crashes when done watching which I am thankful for. For NYTimes I don't know what's better in terms of design but again iPad suffers due to lack of memory.
It is one thing to compare later generation iPad to Nexus 7, but the original iPad? Come on. Should I shoot a side-by-side video comparison? If anyone did such a review there would be an uproar crying foul. (and I'd agree that's not a proper comparison)
iPad has better tablet optimized apps for now. Well, it has more apps for now, period. But original iPad is simply lacking in the hardware department no matter how gorgeously designed an app is. It's not the fault of the app or the OS, the hardware is simply outdated by today's standard. There is nothing wrong or right about it. But there is, when claiming that it's faster than Nexus 7..
iPad has a better speaker.. can't think of anything else. (n.b.: iPad 1!)
P.S. I notice an interesting trend now when an Apple product is compared to competition. If Apple's hardware is lacking or outdated, push the subject toward apps. If Apple's OS is under comparison for missing features or incompleteness, insist on hardware or its status as.. a "status symbol".
Some folks, anyway.
I don't use facebook or twitter, etc., so can't comment on that but as far as HBO Go and NYTimes, it's the same story. On iPad 1, you try anything other than straight forward viewing it crashes. Heck, it still crashes when done watching which I am thankful for. For NYTimes I don't know what's better in terms of design but again iPad suffers due to lack of memory.
It is one thing to compare later generation iPad to Nexus 7, but the original iPad? Come on. Should I shoot a side-by-side video comparison? If anyone did such a review there would be an uproar crying foul. (and I'd agree that's not a proper comparison)
iPad has better tablet optimized apps for now. Well, it has more apps for now, period. But original iPad is simply lacking in the hardware department no matter how gorgeously designed an app is. It's not the fault of the app or the OS, the hardware is simply outdated by today's standard. There is nothing wrong or right about it. But there is, when claiming that it's faster than Nexus 7..
iPad has a better speaker.. can't think of anything else. (n.b.: iPad 1!)
P.S. I notice an interesting trend now when an Apple product is compared to competition. If Apple's hardware is lacking or outdated, push the subject toward apps. If Apple's OS is under comparison for missing features or incompleteness, insist on hardware or its status as.. a "status symbol".
