HL2 aftermath

Legacyc

Junior Member
Jul 17, 2005
23
0
0
with aftermath comming out soon I might need to upgrade my computer. I was curious what you think would bottleneck my pc.

AMD 64 3200+
1gig DDR PC3200(2 512)
6600 GT

Thank you
 

Medixen

Junior Member
Apr 7, 2005
9
0
0
I have the exact same rig and I had no problems with lost coast. I think it might be just fine for the new aftermath episodes. Then again, I prefer playing with 2x antialiasing.
 

razor2025

Diamond Member
May 24, 2002
3,010
0
71
6600 GT isn't that bad @ HDR, as long as you don't do obscene settings. I ran my 6600 (OCed close to GT speeds) on 1680x1050 with HDR, med details and it was hovering 20-30 fps, which is certainly borderline okay range. Although, upgrading might be good, if you want to get the full visual effect. A X850XT (or X800 GTO^2) should let you do 1680x1050 with HDR with high settings. I had a GTO^2 and I played the lost coast demo with that setting and had 40-50 fps.
 

BlacKJesuS

Banned
Jul 19, 2005
1,063
0
0
Originally posted by: razor2025
6600 GT isn't that bad @ HDR, as long as you don't do obscene settings. I ran my 6600 (OCed close to GT speeds) on 1680x1050 with HDR, med details and it was hovering 20-30 fps, which is certainly borderline okay range. Although, upgrading might be good, if you want to get the full visual effect. A X850XT (or X800 GTO^2) should let you do 1680x1050 with HDR with high settings. I had a GTO^2 and I played the lost coast demo with that setting and had 40-50 fps.


wrong....no sm3
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: BlacKJesuS
Originally posted by: razor2025
6600 GT isn't that bad @ HDR, as long as you don't do obscene settings. I ran my 6600 (OCed close to GT speeds) on 1680x1050 with HDR, med details and it was hovering 20-30 fps, which is certainly borderline okay range. Although, upgrading might be good, if you want to get the full visual effect. A X850XT (or X800 GTO^2) should let you do 1680x1050 with HDR with high settings. I had a GTO^2 and I played the lost coast demo with that setting and had 40-50 fps.


wrong....no sm3

HL2 doesn't use SM3. I don't think Aftermath does either.

Get your facts straight before you flame. :thumbsdown:

In fact, stop flaming altogether. :p
 

BlacKJesuS

Banned
Jul 19, 2005
1,063
0
0
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: BlacKJesuS
Originally posted by: razor2025
6600 GT isn't that bad @ HDR, as long as you don't do obscene settings. I ran my 6600 (OCed close to GT speeds) on 1680x1050 with HDR, med details and it was hovering 20-30 fps, which is certainly borderline okay range. Although, upgrading might be good, if you want to get the full visual effect. A X850XT (or X800 GTO^2) should let you do 1680x1050 with HDR with high settings. I had a GTO^2 and I played the lost coast demo with that setting and had 40-50 fps.


wrong....no sm3

HL2 doesn't use SM3. I don't think Aftermath does either.

Get your facts straight before you flame. :thumbsdown:

In fact, stop flaming altogether. :p



SM2 HDR and SM3 HDR
 

hans030390

Diamond Member
Feb 3, 2005
7,326
2
76
Originally posted by: BlacKJesuS
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: BlacKJesuS
Originally posted by: razor2025
6600 GT isn't that bad @ HDR, as long as you don't do obscene settings. I ran my 6600 (OCed close to GT speeds) on 1680x1050 with HDR, med details and it was hovering 20-30 fps, which is certainly borderline okay range. Although, upgrading might be good, if you want to get the full visual effect. A X850XT (or X800 GTO^2) should let you do 1680x1050 with HDR with high settings. I had a GTO^2 and I played the lost coast demo with that setting and had 40-50 fps.


wrong....no sm3

HL2 doesn't use SM3. I don't think Aftermath does either.

Get your facts straight before you flame. :thumbsdown:

In fact, stop flaming altogether. :p



SM2 HDR and SM3 HDR

what? what does SM3 have to do with HL2 at all...