Hitler 'tested small atom bomb'..

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Originally posted by: IGBT
..worrysome to say the least. Can't help but wonder what's going on in Islamic oil revenue states..and the possibility that yet another Manhattan Project may be ongoing among terrorists groups funded by Islamic oil revenue.
Islamic nutjobs are worse than Hitler. In WWII if you killed Hitler, pack up your bags, war's over. If you kill Bin Laden 1,000 other nutjobs will take his place.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,549
48,077
136
Originally posted by: feelingshorter
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Originally posted by: K1052
Bullsh!t.

If you know your history, NOT BULLSHIT AT ALL How many here know that when the war ended, and all Germans surrendered that one of the U boats was delivering uranium isotopes to Japan? Hitler did not have a way to bomb American cities, where as the Japanese did with their navy. Also a japanese "super submarine" was discovered, basicaly it was a huge submarine that carried three bomber class airplanes and parts to build a 4th one with its own hanger and runway....Yea thats one huge submarine. But its been known that Nazi scientists were the ones who invented the atomic theories, so it wouldnt surprise me that the nazis made an atomic bomb knowning that one of the U boats (235) did carry purified uranium to Japan but was taken by the USA after unconditional surrender. There were also two Japs on that same U Boat that commited suicide so i do not know what came about but its rumored that the uranium used on Nagasaki (which ever came first, or Hiroshima) was partly from the German U Boat.

If the Germans had anything close to a bomb they would have used it or at least bargained for peace with it. If they had one, they could have gotten a bomb to New York on a U boat.

Hitler's policies chased most of the leading scientists out of Europe well before the war. They came here and set up shop.

As for captured German uranium being used in Little Boy, Oak Ridge must be one hell of an optical illusion.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
I rememeber reading about this a bit, but I can't remember if it was true or bunk :eek:

You can what-if all day long. People like to "what if" as if one lucky break and it would have turned the tide of the war, and maybe it would have for hitler, but it's not like he had a bunch of feelers out for psycho technology and only needed one return and the allies had nothing. Both sides were technically advanced and constantly coming up with new weapons.
 

Armitage

Banned
Feb 23, 2001
8,086
0
0
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Ausm
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Ausm
Germany was making heavy water in Sweden but I don't believe they ever got to the point of testing it. Another factor was that Hitler was reluctant to trust weapons that were never proven which ultimately lead to his downfall.


Ausm

Norway, the Norsk Hydro plant in Vemork was producing a limited amount of heavy water before the war. The Nazis siezed and upgraded the plant.

Production was stalled due to allied commando raids and strategic bombing. All the heavy water produced ended up at the bottom of a lake.


They tried finding the water a few years ago. Sonar and dive teams could not locate it. But then again it was one of those show's where they spent 2 days on the lake and not a full out effort.



I believe they sunk it in the deepest part of the lake to thwart any attempts of the nazi's recovering it.

Ausm

yeah thats what they said.

But the search was done like 5 years ago or so (the show was on Discover like 3 years ago) and they still didn't find it.

Though again it was a quick 2 day search with limited equipment. They aslo had a thing about the teams that were sent to destroy the factory's that made the hard water and other equipment.

Heavy water - not hard water
 

AnyMal

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
15,780
0
76
It has been proven many times that germans were nowhere near getting an actual bomb. In fact, they never were able to devise a successful method for uranium enrichment.

Part of the problem was lack of resources. While raw uranium was plentiful, the heavy water was not. The only plant that was producing something close to the neede amount was in Norway. In fact, at the time it was the only plant in the world that produced heavy water of 99% purity. Supplies of it, were nowhere near what german scientists were demanding. The Norway plant was continuously sabotaged by the local Resistance as well as britsh bomping raids. The only other plant that could provide some amounts of heavy water was in Italy, but the best they could do was ~10% purity.

Another problem was that there was no centralised research effort. Several competing groups of scientists worked on their own projects, refusing to collaborate and help each other out. Since they worked under different patrons, such as Wermacht, Luftwaffe, SS, they were also forbidden from sharing any information with other groups. Interestingly enough, even Reich Postmaster sponsored a nuclear research lab.

There is another theory as to why germans never succeeded. It was rumored that most scientists simply sabotaged research to the point where it appeared that they are making progress (to protect themselves) but intentionally not getting close enough to the point where uranium could be enriched weapon's grade.
 

cavemanmoron

Lifer
Mar 13, 2001
13,664
28
91
Originally posted by: waggy
yeah i thought this was known? i read a about a mission where some highly trained soldiers went in to germany and blew up the Hard water supply they needed. Also destroyed a plant where they were actually making it.

It was a very dangerous mission. many died on it. But they succeded. IF they didnt it was thought Hitler would have the bomb BEFORE the US did.

 

elmer92413

Senior member
Oct 23, 2004
659
0
0
Originally posted by: IGBT
Text



Karlsch also cites German eyewitnesses as reporting light so bright that for a second it was possible to read a newspaper, accompanied by a sudden blast of wind.

The eyewitnesses, who were interviewed on the subject by the East German authorities in the early 1960s, also said they suffered nose-bleeds, headaches, and nausea for days afterwards.

Karlsch also pointed to measurements carried out recently at the test site that found radioactive isotopes.

I'll believe something the commies say when pigs fly...
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,461
35,106
136
AnyMal has it about right. The Germans weren't anywhere close to having a bomb. Uranium enrichment was not achieved in industrial quantities. Fission reactors were not achieved due to purity problems with the graphite used in the experimental pile. Richard Rhodes' "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" is an excellent read on the subject.

Side note: You don't even need heavy water to build a bomb. It was a fortuitous divsersion of resources though.
 

dderidex

Platinum Member
Mar 13, 2001
2,732
0
0
Originally posted by: ironwing
AnyMal has it about right. The Germans weren't anywhere close to having a bomb. Uranium enrichment was not achieved in industrial quantities. Fission reactors were not achieved due to purity problems with the graphite used in the experimental pile. Richard Rhodes' "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" is an excellent read on the subject.

Side note: You don't even need heavy water to build a bomb. It was a fortuitous divsersion of resources though.

No, but heavy water is a key component in one type of 'breeder' reactor that turns natural Uranium into Plutonium. With adequate supplies of heavy water, Germany COULD have bred Uranium into weapons-grade Plutonium. But...they never had enough heavy water to.

Keep in mind that heavy water *itself* is not used in a bomb, it's just used to make the parts needed to MAKE a bomb. (FWIW, I understand it's theoretically possibly to build a fusion bomb with heavy water as the fusable element...but you'd still need a fission bomb to set off the fusion reaction, which usually calls for plutonium)
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: K1052
If they had one, they could have gotten a bomb to New York on a U boat.

Not near the end of the war, which is when they would have had a bomb. The U-boats ruled the oceans at first, but that changed with sonar and dedicated sub-hunters. Not to mention allied subs...
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,549
48,077
136
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: K1052
If they had one, they could have gotten a bomb to New York on a U boat.

Not near the end of the war, which is when they would have had a bomb. The U-boats ruled the oceans at first, but that changed with sonar and dedicated sub-hunters. Not to mention allied subs...

The Type XXI could have made it since it doesn?t have to surface to recharge batteries and has a very long battery endurance. As long as they stayed clear of allied convoys and didn't engage any targets I would give them a good chance of reaching NYC and detonating close to the city.
 

GML3G0

Golden Member
Jan 1, 2005
1,356
0
0
Actually, the Germans shipped the Uranium to Japan via submarine so they could utilize it, since they realized they already lost the war. The U.S. (I think) intercepted it and good thing the war stopped then too, because Japan planned to drop a radioactive weapon on the West Coast just two weeks later.
 

Kevin1211

Golden Member
Dec 14, 2004
1,582
0
0
Originally posted by: GML3G0
Actually, the Germans shipped the Uranium to Japan via submarine so they could utilize it, since they realized they already lost the war. The U.S. (I think) intercepted it and good thing the war stopped then too, because Japan planned to drop a radioactive weapon on the West Coast just two weeks later.

no actually the crew finally decided to surrender instead of delivering it to Japan....
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
well its bs considering the size of the facilities the manhatten project required. they were insane. and woulda been easy targets for bombers if germany had them
 

Gibsons

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
12,530
35
91
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
"Hitler 'tested small atom bomb'."

Total BS.

Thank you for providing us with such well-documented evidence to the contrary!


It's pretty well documented in a number of previous posts.

They didn't have the know-how or the industrial capability to build a nuclear weapon. Google up Heisenberg/german/bomb. Heisenberg, head of German A bomb research, thought an A bomb required tons of Uranium. He'd crunched the numbers wrong. They never figured that out. They never had a bomb and were at least a year (likely much more) away from building one.

Next up should the Mercury powered flying saucers operating from the secret underground Nazi base in Antarctica.

 

cain

Banned
Aug 1, 2003
2,512
0
0
i am pretty sure that if this were true, it would have been brought to light alot of sooner than now. i mean the history channel pretty went through everything about ww2 and revealed pretty much everything about hitler's research programs. i didn't see anything of this type in my readings either. but a video game would be cool, i will play it.
 
Aug 27, 2002
10,043
2
0
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Originally posted by: K1052
Bullsh!t.
indeed. considering that we captured several dirty bombs (uranium scattering explosives) the nazi's tried to build a nuke, but where far from figuring out a large number of the equations to start a thermonuclear chain reaction yet.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: Thera
It would've saved so many lives. :(

hehe yes, then Hitler could have nuked London, New York and other cities to get the countries to surrender, would have saved alot of lives instead of invading.

Now where have I heard that logic before hmmm :p
 

43st

Diamond Member
Nov 7, 2001
3,197
0
0
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Thera
It would've saved so many lives. :(

hehe yes, then Hitler could have nuked London, New York and other cities to get the countries to surrender, would have saved alot of lives instead of invading.

Now where have I heard that logic before hmmm :p

:D