• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

history question: did the japanese ever apologize to...

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Yeah we just didn't hear them over the screams of terror when we dropped the bombs.

They don't teach reality of the A-Bomb at UT? Shocking... guess you'd rather have Russia invading and killing millions as well as the soldiers and citizens that would have died in Japan. More loss of life would have been better then? Moron.

So dropping the bombs on cities was better than demonstrating the power first as was suggested?

Seeing as it took wiping out two cities to get them to surrender, yes. You do realize that after hitting Nagasaki, we were out of nukes, and wouldnt have enough refined uranium or plutonium to make another for a couple months?

I know this is off topic. Both the US and Japan need to apologize for what it did in WWII:

The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki : Chapter 10 - Total Casualtiesl


WWII civilian casualities

10,000,000 Chinese were killed!
 
Originally posted by: DaWhim
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Yeah we just didn't hear them over the screams of terror when we dropped the bombs.

the only difference between dropping 2000 bombs or 2 atomic bombs is more civilian deads., which was good. damn Truman!

you do understand that MORE civilians would have died if we HADNT dropped the bombs right? thats what you liberals dont understand....same thing with iraq...more civilians would have died if we HADNT invaded, but you just dont see those...
 
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
I know this is off topic. Both the US and Japan need to apologize for what it did in WWII:

The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki : Chapter 10 - Total Casualtiesl

Conventional bombing of Japan killed more people than the nuclear bombs. The March 1945 firebombing of Tokyo killed ~100,000 people and injured roughly a million. The May bombing killed roughly 80,000.

And frankly, I dont see why the USA has to apologize. Japan decided they wanted a war with the USA, and it is pretty obvious who initiated it. Excluding a few revisionist historians who presume the war would have ended very quickly without an invasion or atomic bombs, the casualty estimates for both sides, individually, exceeded the casualties at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Japanese were training old men, old women, and children with ages in the single digits how to weild spears made out of bamboo and charge the american forces. Not a good idea when your opponents have BARs, Thompsons, and Garands. Unless you want to see a slaughter. One way or another, large numbers of people were going to die. Truman went with the option that would kill the smallest number of people.
 
Originally posted by: Calin
<sarcasm>
What's the hurry? It's only a couple of years ago that the Pope apologize for the Inquisition
I'm sure the Koreans can wait a couple of centuries
</sarcasm>

I don't know. Probably they should have to - but I doubt they did, or that they will. One or two more generations, and this will remain only in the memory of the books and in the memory of the deads

Calin

And that's the problem, those who did it and those who knew and did not act do not want to admit or apologize to the victims.

No use for people in a few centuries to apologize.
 
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
I know this is off topic. Both the US and Japan need to apologize for what it did in WWII:

The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki : Chapter 10 - Total Casualtiesl

Conventional bombing of Japan killed more people than the nuclear bombs. The March 1945 firebombing of Tokyo killed ~100,000 people and injured roughly a million. The May bombing killed roughly 80,000.

And frankly, I dont see why the USA has to apologize. Japan decided they wanted a war with the USA, and it is pretty obvious who initiated it. Excluding a few revisionist historians who presume the war would have ended very quickly without an invasion or atomic bombs, the casualty estimates for both sides, individually, exceeded the casualties at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Japanese were training old men, old women, and children with ages in the single digits how to weild spears made out of bamboo and charge the american forces. Not a good idea when your opponents have BARs, Thompsons, and Garands. Unless you want to see a slaughter. One way or another, large numbers of people were going to die. Truman went with the option that would kill the smallest number of people.

You do not consider firebombing civilians an atrocity?

Why not?
 
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
I know this is off topic. Both the US and Japan need to apologize for what it did in WWII:

The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki : Chapter 10 - Total Casualtiesl

Conventional bombing of Japan killed more people than the nuclear bombs. The March 1945 firebombing of Tokyo killed ~100,000 people and injured roughly a million. The May bombing killed roughly 80,000.

And frankly, I dont see why the USA has to apologize. Japan decided they wanted a war with the USA, and it is pretty obvious who initiated it. Excluding a few revisionist historians who presume the war would have ended very quickly without an invasion or atomic bombs, the casualty estimates for both sides, individually, exceeded the casualties at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Japanese were training old men, old women, and children with ages in the single digits how to weild spears made out of bamboo and charge the american forces. Not a good idea when your opponents have BARs, Thompsons, and Garands. Unless you want to see a slaughter. One way or another, large numbers of people were going to die. Truman went with the option that would kill the smallest number of people.

You do not consider firebombing civilians an atrocity?

Why not?

Probably the same reason Palestinians claim civilians are perfectly normal targets, they also say that they are at war with the whole country and all its people, not just the government and its soldiers. Don't you agree that bombing people who do not fight you and who live under a non-democratic government (the Emperor) is perfectly normal?
 
The atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the most expedient way to end the war with the fewest amounts of casualties on both sides.

The only other options were:

1. Invade -Japanese deaths would be in the millions, U.S. casualties would reach several hundred thousand

2. Blockade - Cut off all remaining shipping to the islands. This would result in mass starvation and huge numbers of deaths from starvation.

A negotiated peace would have produced too many concessions for the U.S. to accept.
 
Originally posted by: K1052
The atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the most expedient way to end the war with the fewest amounts of casualties on both sides.

The only other options were:

1. Invade -Japanese deaths would be in the millions, U.S. casualties would reach several hundred thousand

2. Blockade - Cut off all remaining shipping to the islands. This would result in mass starvation and huge numbers of deaths from starvation.

A negotiated peace would have produced too many concessions for the U.S. to accept.

Bombing the Emperor's palace was an option, but they didn't dare to try that as they were not sure what would happen.
 
Originally posted by: masterxfob
Originally posted by: Lifer
seriously, what would an apology do at this point?
rolleye.gif

if a drunk driver were to kill your daughter (if you don't have one, imagine) and was sent to prison and never tried to apologize, would you be satisfied? wouldn't it be easier to move on if the man/woman that killed your daughter apologized and tried to make amends over the years?

ohh, but then again, what difference would it make? unlike many of you children who care only about themselves, an apology makes a world of difference to others.
Um, when the drunk driver and the victim's parents are all dead, who really cares? Should we apologize to countries for past administrations where we've planned, backed, and supported a coup? War is evil, tell us something we don't know, but don't expect current administrations to apologize for mistakes they didn't make, and where a scarce amount of people even live to still remember it.

 
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Originally posted by: K1052
The atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the most expedient way to end the war with the fewest amounts of casualties on both sides.

The only other options were:

1. Invade -Japanese deaths would be in the millions, U.S. casualties would reach several hundred thousand

2. Blockade - Cut off all remaining shipping to the islands. This would result in mass starvation and huge numbers of deaths from starvation.

A negotiated peace would have produced too many concessions for the U.S. to accept.

Bombing the Emperor's palace was an option, but they didn't dare to try that as they were not sure what would happen.

That is correct. That is also why Tokyo was eventually discarded as one of the first targets for the bomb.
 
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
You do not consider firebombing civilians an atrocity?

Why not?

How is one firebombing any different than a long protracted bombing campaign using HE to accomplish the same goals?

The only real difference is you cant say "on this date, xxx people died", you have to say "between days yyy and zzz, xxx people died". Its not as "impressive" of a fact on an emotional level, but it still means equal numbers of people dead.
 
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Originally posted by: K1052
The atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the most expedient way to end the war with the fewest amounts of casualties on both sides.

The only other options were:

1. Invade -Japanese deaths would be in the millions, U.S. casualties would reach several hundred thousand

2. Blockade - Cut off all remaining shipping to the islands. This would result in mass starvation and huge numbers of deaths from starvation.

A negotiated peace would have produced too many concessions for the U.S. to accept.

Bombing the Emperor's palace was an option, but they didn't dare to try that as they were not sure what would happen.

In the end, the military still wanted to fight on. The emperor made them surrender.
 
Guess we should apologize to Vietnam... while everyone is at it.

Dawhim... What does Hentai have to do with anything? you think everyone in Japan watches that stuff... just like we all enjoy goatse and other sick websites.
 
Originally posted by: DrNoobie
Why should they apologize? I'm sure they're not sorry. At the time, they thought what they were doing was the right course of action for their country. War is war, apologies afterward are moronic.
So the ends justify the means? It's OK to violate every single code of ethical behavior if it is war?

Let me guess, you think Neville Chamberlain and Jimmy Carter were visionaries...

 
Originally posted by: DaWhim
Originally posted by: diegoalcatraz
As far as I can tell, the only reason the world hasn't crucified Japan over world war II like they've done to Nazi Germany was because we (the US) wanted Japan as a buffer against communism, and allowed (read:encouraged) the incidents to be forgotten.

It's kind of odd how our public schools taught us to feel guilt over the Bombs, to demonize the nazis (and rightfully so), while completing ommitting the Japanese WWII attrocities. It wasn't until I took a college course on Japanese History until I learned these things.

</rant>

Having said that, history is history, and it happened six decades ago. Every nation makes mistakes and has skeletons in their closet, and we're sure as hell not entirely faultless. But we can't hold the current generation accountable for what their parents did.

history is history, the Japs is trying to change the history by making we chinese invited them to invade us. keep in mind that they still DENY the Rape of Nanji was even happened in which they killed 300,000 citizens in 1 day. there is something need to be justified.
btw, 6 decades is only 1 generation.


300K in one day is not accurate. The rape of Nanji took place over the course of serveral months.


Nanking
 
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: DrNoobie
Why should they apologize? I'm sure they're not sorry. At the time, they thought what they were doing was the right course of action for their country. War is war, apologies afterward are moronic.
So the ends justify the means? It's OK to violate every single code of ethical behavior if it is war?

Let me guess, you think Neville Chamberlain and Jimmy Carter were visionaries...

All's fair in love and war. Do we need to mention how the US violated every code of ethical behavior against the Native Americans? In this case, the US would not have many states if it didn't destroy the Native Americans... was it wrong? Yes, of course, but it was war and I don't think Americans today should have to apologize for the actions of generations past.
 
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: DrNoobie
Why should they apologize? I'm sure they're not sorry. At the time, they thought what they were doing was the right course of action for their country. War is war, apologies afterward are moronic.
So the ends justify the means? It's OK to violate every single code of ethical behavior if it is war?

Let me guess, you think Neville Chamberlain and Jimmy Carter were visionaries...

All's fair in love and war. Do we need to mention how the US violated every code of ethical behavior against the Native Americans? In this case, the US would not have many states if it didn't destroy the Native Americans... was it wrong? Yes, of course, but it was war and I don't think Americans today should have to apologize for the actions of generations past.
On what date did we declare war on the American Indian? I forget my history. Was it 1834 or never?

 
their suffering should not be forgotten.

Of course, but WTF do you want the current generation of Japanese to do. They had absolutely nothing to do with what happened back then, and would not support ever doing such a thing. Why are you people blatantly blaming an entire Japanese society. Blame the Japanese GOVERNMENT if you want, but calling Japanese people as "fsckers" as the OP did is absurd.

i'm trying to be nice here, but you give me all the more reason to be an ass. japan never admitted or apologized to the comfort woman, nor did they admit any specific details of what they did. sure, most chinese/korean folks don't care anymore, but the ones that were affected still do.

i surely hope you are a "white" lee and not a "chinese" or "korean" lee, to be asian and that ignorant would be sad.

Your last comment shows that you are so tied down to your cultural history that you can't move beyond it. They admit wrongdoing and that is satisfactory for me. The events happened, but we need to move on and forge new improved relationships. Current Japan != past Japan. Thats like blaming current Jews on the death of the Jesus, or blaming current Germans for the death many Jews. They had absolutey nothing to do with it. Funny, much of the conflicts that have happened in Europe was because people were too tied down on history, like the French making Germany suffer after World War I, which of course led to WWII.

And where is America's apology to Vietnam? Thats right, it never happened because the US still refuses to fully admit wrong doing.

wait wait, you just compared washington and jefferson to japanese war criminals. like the generals and soldiers that allowed/performed the killing of hundreds of thousands of civilians thru methods like beheading with a dull blade, bayonet practice on live victims, chemical and medical tests on innocent civilians and families, rape, etc. aka mini hitlers. good job.
Yeah and none of that happened to the native americans or slaves did it? Let me emphasize the word genocide of the native americans and the word slaves.

and washington promoted expansion to the west because he was a realtor wanting to make money? wtf history book are you reading
One of several reasons why Washington promoted expansion to the West. WTF history book am I reading? It's a shame your history book is censored by the government and doesn't tell the full account of what really happened and why. Gee, that line sounds mighty familiar.
 
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: DrNoobie
Why should they apologize? I'm sure they're not sorry. At the time, they thought what they were doing was the right course of action for their country. War is war, apologies afterward are moronic.
So the ends justify the means? It's OK to violate every single code of ethical behavior if it is war?

Let me guess, you think Neville Chamberlain and Jimmy Carter were visionaries...

All's fair in love and war. Do we need to mention how the US violated every code of ethical behavior against the Native Americans? In this case, the US would not have many states if it didn't destroy the Native Americans... was it wrong? Yes, of course, but it was war and I don't think Americans today should have to apologize for the actions of generations past.
On what date did we declare war on the American Indian? I forget my history. Was it 1834 or never?
Ask Native Americans if atrocities of WAR were committed against their people. A "war" doesn't have to be officially "declared" to commit atrocities against someone. Why don't we call it a "campaign" to wipe out Native Americans and steal their land instead? It doesn't matter if it technically isn't an official "war" and instead a "campaign", atrocities are atrocities nonetheless and we are no less innocent than the Japanese when it comes to genocide.
 
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: DrNoobie
Why should they apologize? I'm sure they're not sorry. At the time, they thought what they were doing was the right course of action for their country. War is war, apologies afterward are moronic.
So the ends justify the means? It's OK to violate every single code of ethical behavior if it is war?

Let me guess, you think Neville Chamberlain and Jimmy Carter were visionaries...

All's fair in love and war. Do we need to mention how the US violated every code of ethical behavior against the Native Americans? In this case, the US would not have many states if it didn't destroy the Native Americans... was it wrong? Yes, of course, but it was war and I don't think Americans today should have to apologize for the actions of generations past.
On what date did we declare war on the American Indian? I forget my history. Was it 1834 or never?
Ask Native Americans if atrocities of WAR were committed against their people. A "war" doesn't have to be officially "declared" to commit atrocities against someone. Why don't we call it a "campaign" to wipe out Native Americans and steal their land instead? It doesn't matter if it technically isn't an official "war" and instead a "campaign", atrocities are atrocities nonetheless and we are no less innocent then the Japanese when it comes to genocide.
Atrocities is a bad enough word. You don't have to make them WAR atrocities to make them horrible...
 
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: DrNoobie
Why should they apologize? I'm sure they're not sorry. At the time, they thought what they were doing was the right course of action for their country. War is war, apologies afterward are moronic.
So the ends justify the means? It's OK to violate every single code of ethical behavior if it is war?

Let me guess, you think Neville Chamberlain and Jimmy Carter were visionaries...

All's fair in love and war. Do we need to mention how the US violated every code of ethical behavior against the Native Americans? In this case, the US would not have many states if it didn't destroy the Native Americans... was it wrong? Yes, of course, but it was war and I don't think Americans today should have to apologize for the actions of generations past.

You can justify a lot of evil with this argument. The Nazis conducted ethnic cleansing. Tough nookies....
 
Originally posted by: nanyangview
So the german holocaust is justified eh? Since it is part of the war and thus they should exterminate every Jew possible as it is the best course of action for germany?

So Japan murdered civilians, raped uncounted number of woman for their own pleasure is also the best course of action for Japan?

exactly... i'm sorry drnookie or whatever your name is, but you really have no idea what you're talking about. gang raping a pregnant woman, then cutting out the unborn baby with your sword while she's alive... i just don't see how you can justify that.
 
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: nanyangview
So the german holocaust is justified eh? Since it is part of the war and thus they should exterminate every Jew possible as it is the best course of action for germany?

So Japan murdered civilians, raped uncounted number of woman for their own pleasure is also the best course of action for Japan?
Do you think that Germans today should have to apologize for the Nazi's? I don't feel that I have to apologize to any Native American for what my forefathers did, because it was something that I recognize as an atrocity and as wrong. It was something that I would never condone, nor partake in. Recognizing this is enough, and an apology is unnecessary.

 
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: nanyangview
So the german holocaust is justified eh? Since it is part of the war and thus they should exterminate every Jew possible as it is the best course of action for germany?

So Japan murdered civilians, raped uncounted number of woman for their own pleasure is also the best course of action for Japan?
Do you think that Germans today should have to apologize for the Nazi's? I don't feel that I have to apologize to any Native American for what my forefathers did, because it was something that I recognize as an atrocity and as wrong. It was something that I would never condone, nor partake in. Recognizing this is enough, and an apology is unnecessary.

well the german government already apologized.. but let me ask you this, what does japan lose by apologizing?

and a key difference is that in both cases of germany and america, everyone knows about the atrocities, its taught everywhere etc... from what i understand, nobody really talks about it in japan and some people even think it was the right thing to do.

furthermore, some of the soldiers who committed the atrocities are still alive... some have written books about how it was wrong etc, but others maintain they did the right thing.
 
No they will never apologize, suicide to save face is their motto. No I do not hate the sons of Nippon 🙂

In the Pulitzer Prize winning book, Hirohito And The Making of Modern Japan, it is documented how they slipped wording
past our censers in the new Constitution that kept Koreans from becoming citizens. Most of these Koreans had been in Japan five generations.

80 year old comfort women still protest to this day, once a month at the Japanese embassy in Seoul.
Read, The Comfort Women, it's grim reading 🙁

A good detailed account of Japan's last days as an empire can be read in the book, The Last Mission. Baka Bomb anyone or maybe a suicide torpedo or an exploding frogman, the list is long.

Mill is right, the A-bomb kept the Russian Bear out of Japan. Russia was still pissed-off about the spanking Japan gave her in 1905 ?.

Most of Japan's Army in China at the end of hostilities never came home, this is documented in the Hirohito book.

Japan has given to China a lot of old tooling for mass production of goods, as a form of reparation. Thats why China is the leading producer of motorcycles in the world, 350cc and under.

We needed Japan because of what was going on in China in 1947 and too much was glossed over.

Once again, Japan will never apologize. My hope is, that someday soon(15years) China & Korea swallow her economically 😀

 
Back
Top