• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

HIPPA violation?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I work for a hospital in IT and can safely say that no, this is not a violation. My place of employment also does the whole "if you smoke you pay more for insurance". And while they have yet to test anyone to my knowledge, they claim they can drop coverage for you if they determine you are smoking and arent paying the extra $50 per pay.
 
Smokers cost the company and insurance company more, and they should pay higher rates.

Smokers cost the company and insurance company more, and they should pay higher rates.
Smokers are much more apt to have acute lung issues, such as upper respiratory infections, pneumonia, flu, etc... Aside from the potential lung cancer and COPD they may experience later in life.

I am not a smoker and this is just my own personal observation from the companies i have worked for. the people i see who cost the company and insurance more money are not the smokers. The smokers i know and work with are no more sick than i am and the people i see who are costing the insurance and company more money are the spouses who have chronic depression, or the kids who are hopped up on ADD drugs, or the spouses who have multiple surgeries over a 2 year period. or the VP who has a heart attack and a quad by-pass.

again this is just my own unscientific observations and personal opinion.
 
Back
Top