• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Hillary worked with Google CEOs to keep #Bengazhi video from public

0roo0roo

0roo0roo

No Lifer
F7przwT.png

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/710855886940540929

A confirmation of the power we feared they would misuse, to control what you are allowed to see.


Sweden's star "progressive" journalism outfit @Researchgruppen founded and run by secret police agent
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/708850775741632512
 
Last edited:
Victorian Gray said:
Wikileaks Exaggerates Story About State Department Working With Google To Block Video

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...ment-working-with-google-to-block-video.shtml
Click to expand...

It's ambiguous but I don't find techdirt's interpretation terribly convincing.

The State Department followed up a call with Google saying the video won't be unblocked before Monday. According to techdirt this is the "most" the government could have been doing, ignoring any possibility that the mail was in response to a request made to keep the video blocked (or to unblock it). Even though that would still be consistent with the e-mail.

So the proposed scenario is that it was YouTube's decision all along to keep the video blocked until "at least Monday" and therefore that date was relevant to them and not the government. But why would they have independently developed such a short term and specific timeline for the video's block status? What conditions would make the video, from YouTube's perspective, block-worthy now but maybe not a few days later?

It's much more likely that this timeframe was relevant to the government than it was to YouTube.
 
Oh, God! Conspiracy!

To do what, other than deny demagogues in Muslim countries a tool for incitement of violence against us? Over a POS video trailer designed to do just that?

Cuz Freedumb! Right?
 
Jhhnn said:
Oh, God! Conspiracy!

To do what, other than deny demagogues in Muslim countries a tool for incitement of violence against us? Over a POS video trailer designed to do just that?

Cuz Freedumb! Right?
Click to expand...

Why do you defend people that are so stupid that they kill because of a video?
 
"conspiracy"? Is that the defense for the email scandal and this additional possible suppression of information by the new social media elite?

Remember
eFxG0Iq.png

http://fortune.com/2015/10/05/alphabet-google-evil/

This goes on in an environment where Jack Dorsey is lying to the public.

Jack Dorsey Denies Twitter Censors Users
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/03/18/jack-dorsey-denies-twitter-censors-users/

When its clear his employees have been personally altering results to insult their ideological enemies, never mind the more blatant methods of simply censoring people, or the cadre of like minded people he's put in charge of his "trust and safety" council.

And no different at facebook, where much the same is going on
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/710884889797722112

Vice president of the EU commission
https://twitter.com/TimmermansEU/status/709388784798932992

People in power have their motivations, its just best to take note and be skeptical. Lets not pretend I've posted anything on benghazi recently if ever. So some of your attempts to simply cry "conservative" just show how intellectually bankrupt the regressive left has become.
 
No, its because you rightwing simpletons repeat the same made up bullshit constantly and its tiring. You don't get to say someone is intellectually bankrupt when you post shit from Brietbart, just an fyi.
 
CitizenKain said:
No, its because you rightwing simpletons repeat the same made up bullshit constantly and its tiring. You don't get to say someone is intellectually bankrupt when you post shit from Brietbart, just an fyi.
Click to expand...

You pretending there is a difference between Breitbart and other news sources at this point is the problem.

There is no high ground anymore for you to pretend you can dismiss things simply based on your prejudices. Its the dishonesty of the regressive left which has handed Breitbart story after story.. It's your own damned fault they have any credibility at all.

So yea, as I said, you resorted to "conservative" as an argument.

This is the state of things.
 
0roo0roo said:
You pretending there is a difference between Breitbart and other news sources at this point is the problem.

There is no high ground anymore for you to pretend you can dismiss things simply based on your prejudices. Its the dishonesty of the regressive left which has handed Breitbart story after story.. It's your own damned fault they have any credibility at all.

So yea, as I said, you resorted to "conservative" as an argument.

This is the state of things.
Click to expand...

The state of so-called conservatism makes the argument valid.

Your original contention proves that. If what you contend about google & the State Dept censoring the video trailer in muslim countries is true, so what? Why does it matter to any of us?
 
Blue_Max said:
*ahem*
"pay gap"
"rape culture"
"patriarchy"
"white/male privilege"

...yeah, whose side is constantly repeating very-debunked bullshit?
Click to expand...
Benghazi.

White Water.

Vincent Foster.

Fast and Furious.

Solyndra

Planned Parenthood

Transcipts! Transcripts! Transcripts!

Birth Certificates.

Clearly, only libruuuuuuuls do it.
 
I hear Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu, and all the SJWs were in on it too. better get GG on it... for freedom... or something.


____________
 
blankslate said:
I hear Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu, and all the SJWs were in on it too. better get GG on it... for freedom... or something.
Click to expand...

Victorian Gray said:
<whine> SocialMediaWarrior! <whine>
Click to expand...

CitizenKain said:
Tell us more about the mean terrible women that proved that you are weak little man.
Click to expand...

Anyone catch the common theme?

Call out a Leftie on their ridiculous cult doctrines, if they can't debate on the merits of their system, or counter with accurate facts, they attack en masse with a slurry of insults charged with 'power words' designed to incite a mob.
'hate speech' 'misogynist' 'racist' 'bigot' etc.

Every. Damn. Time.

south-park-season-premiere.jpg


I'm glad the world is getting fed up with Regressives. Ignoring them won't make them go away and catering to them is self-destructive.

If you can't be truthful, there's no point debating with you - and there's certainly no reason to give you anything you demand.
 
Blue_Max said:
Anyone catch the common theme?

Call out a Leftie on their ridiculous cult doctrines, if they can't debate on the merits of their system, or counter with accurate facts, they attack en masse with a slurry of insults charged with 'power words' designed to incite a mob.
'hate speech' 'misogynist' 'racist' 'bigot' etc.

Every. Damn. Time.



I'm glad the world is getting fed up with Regressives. Ignoring them won't make them go away and catering to them is self-destructive.

If you can't be truthful, there's no point debating with you - and there's certainly no reason to give you anything you demand.
Click to expand...


"I am SocialMediaWarrior! Hear me roar! Aww, you're mean to me."

Would you like us to create a safe space for you?
 
Victorian Gray said:
"I am SocialMediaWarrior! Hear me roar! Aww, you're mean to me."

Would you like us to create a safe space for you?
Click to expand...

...aaaaand that would be projection.
Only the regressive left demands silence of 'mean words' and 'safe spaces'.

It's like you're holding a spray can, paint on your hands, having just sprayed "#killallmen" on the side of a wall -- then point to the nearest man and scream, "HE SPRAYED THIS WALL! ARREST HIM!!"

You're the offender, then immediately claim someone ELSE is the offender of your own crime and you're the innocent victim of it. It's like you win twice.

Regressive left in a nutshell.
 
Blue_Max said:
...aaaaand that would be projection.
Only the regressive left demands silence of 'mean words' and 'safe spaces'.

It's like you're holding a spray can, paint on your hands, having just sprayed "#killallmen" on the side of a wall -- then point to the nearest man and scream, "HE SPRAYED THIS WALL! ARREST HIM!!"

You're the offender, then immediately claim someone ELSE is the offender of your own crime and you're the innocent victim of it.

Regressive left in a nutshell.
Click to expand...

You're the one who seems offended by everything dude. You really seem to need some safe space.

<whine> SocialMediaWarrior! <whine>
 
Jhhnn said:
The state of so-called conservatism makes the argument valid.

Your original contention proves that. If what you contend about google & the State Dept censoring the video trailer in muslim countries is true, so what? Why does it matter to any of us?
Click to expand...

The state of whatever side the comments above are on reveals they don't even have an argument to make at all.

They just smugly assume they are right, being the "high information" voters they are.


here you go.

Wikileaks vs Hillary Clinton
http://therationalists.org/2016/03/20/wikileaks-vs-hillary-clinton/
 
Last edited:
Jhhnn said:
If what you contend about google & the State Dept censoring the video trailer in muslim countries is true, so what? Why does it matter to any of us?
Click to expand...

If you think the state department should be working with the companies to determine what people are allowed to see and when, then clearly there's no hope for you, hildebeast is the right candidate for you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top