- Dec 21, 2005
- 11,521
- 0
- 76
OK, this is getting f'n ridiculous. Clinton has finally decided to throw in the FL/MI card, and moves the g'damn goalposts again -- essentially negating the entire Rules Committee.
The scary thing is that the Democratic Party might let the crazy bitch get away with it!
I'd have more respect for Clinton, and her fanbois, if they'd just admit that they're willing to lie, cheat, or steal the fucking nomination if they have to!
The scary thing is that the Democratic Party might let the crazy bitch get away with it!
Clinton campaign retools delegate math
By Christina Bellantoni
May 6, 2008
DURHAM, N.C. ? Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign yesterday tried to redefine the delegate math for securing the Democratic presidential nomination, signaling its willingness to wage a divisive battle with front-runner Sen. Barack Obama through the summer.
Mr. Obama, meanwhile, questioned Mrs. Clinton's trustworthiness heading into today's primaries in Indiana and North Carolina.
Top Clinton aides said the nominee must win based on a tally that includes delegates from Florida and Michigan, which held January primaries that were disqualified by party rules. The campaign's "Delegate Hub" Web site identifies 2,208 as the total delegates needed to be nominated, or 183 more than the threshold of 2,025 set by the Democratic National Committee's rules.
"That's what we believe is the standard for deciding this ? who has the majority of the total delegates including Michigan and Florida to decide the nomination," said Clinton strategist Geoff Garin.
The Obama campaign has long accused Team Clinton of "moving the goal posts" to avoid facing the reality that it is nearly impossible for her to catch up, and his supporters in the Democratic Party's hierarchy reacted angrily yesterday to the idea that the 2,025-delegate finish line could be changed, especially because Mr. Obama is 273 delegates from reaching that magic number according to his campaign count.
"When you totally ignore the rules, letting these people change the outcome, that doesn't pass the straight-face test," Allan Katz of Tallahassee, Fla., a member of the DNC's executive committee, told The Washington Times.
"It's not just a question of changing the rules, it's ignoring the reason the [DNC's] rules committee is there, to enforce the rules. You don't get relieved of that responsibility if you don't like the outcome," Mr. Katz said.
Mr. Garin said "neither candidate" will have the needed delegates by June 3 when the last votes are counted in South Dakota and Montana. But Mr. Obama, should he win over a large bloc of superdelegates ? elected officials and party activists who help decide the nomination ? could get to 2,025 by then.
I'd have more respect for Clinton, and her fanbois, if they'd just admit that they're willing to lie, cheat, or steal the fucking nomination if they have to!
