Lets make Puerto Rico a state. They need it a hell of a lot more than DC.
That's a non-sequiter
Put the federal government in a state and it is then at the mercy of the lawmakers in that state.
That's really a nonissue. The Federal Government already operates offices and property in all 50 states. They are hardly beholden to state laws. But if that did really worry you, you could always split D.C. in such a way that the there is only a non-residential "Capital Area" for major federal holdings.Do you really want the federal government beholden to state laws?
Good for her. It's about time that the welfare state was an actual place.
That's really a nonissue. The Federal Government already operates offices and property in all 50 states. They are hardly beholden to state laws. But if that did really worry you, you could always split D.C. in such a way that the there is only a non-residential "Capital Area" for major federal holdings.
Or you could incorporate D.C.'s federal representation into Maryland, as it was initially - redraw a few Maryland congressional districts to represent the people of D.C. at the federal level, while overall jurisdictional issues remain as they currently stand.
That plan works also. I know the extra Senate seats are the big prize they want but getting 10 or so new House seats under the Maryland delegation seems like a good compromise.
The Puerto Ricans don't want it. In the last referendum, they chose the status quo.Lets make Puerto Rico a state. They need it a hell of a lot more than DC.
Liberals will do anything to win the White House, including handing out equal representation like god damn candy.
That's a stupid argument. States aren't carved out by area alone.
The Puerto Ricans don't want it. In the last referendum, they chose the status quo.
still made about a dem justice to replace scalia?Liberals will do anything to win the White House, including handing out equal representation like god damn candy.
I think the Constitution is correct and that DC should not be given statehood. The reasons are still valid. IMO the District of Columbia was never intended to be an area of residence. The people that are living there chose to do so with the constitutional limits in place.
That's fine. Then make the rules consistent with the constitution. Make DC a place where if you live, you don't pay taxes and cannot get drafted into the military nor do you get medicaid or medicare benefits.
Not exactly... Congress just doesn't want to allow it.
All US Citizens pay federal taxes regardless if they live in a state or not.
We do not have a draft at present. All US Male Citizens that meet the criteria are eligible to be drafted regardless if they live in a state or not.
All US Citizens are eligible for medicaid or medicare if they meet the rules Regardless if they live in a state or not.
The rules are consistent. I'm not sure what you mean.
Citizens overseas are subject to these rules and citizens living in US territories like Guam?
I guess some people are more equal than other people is what you're arguing?
Why do we have states at all actually? What tangible benefit are we actually getting from 50 different states as opposed to say no states or just a few states total (like 5 or 7)?
DC has an area of 61.05 square miles.
Texas has a land area of 268,581 square miles.
If DC is allowed to become a state, and receive two senators, then I propose Texas be broken up into 4,399 "DC" sized states and receive 8,798 senators.
What's fair is fair.
