• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Hillary Denies White House Run In Trouble

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Waaaaaah, poor baby needs his bottle. :frown:

Who needs the bottle...Dr. Paul?

I'd sure need something strong after a defeat like that! 😛

Oh, burn. Gee that was a good one. :roll:

Stop crying, little man, you're going to short out your computer.
 
Originally posted by: Dari
How do you find all this stuff?

EDIT: Oh, and Mrs. Clinton is all about change now:laugh:

Simple, Real Clear Politics, not only gathers all the major polls, it also gathers and links to all the major news.

The Drudge Report, is where he got the last batch though.
 
That's something I find kind of funny. Pab goes on and on about Hillary but do most dems even care? I don't want to see her in the white house, and his going on and on about her is falling on deaf ears. Pab truly is becoming the new Dave..
 
Originally posted by: mrCide
That's something I find kind of funny. Pab goes on and on about Hillary but do most dems even care? I don't want to see her in the white house, and his going on and on about her is falling on deaf ears. Pab truly is becoming the new Dave..

seriously.

I'm probably the most pro-Hillary person on these forums and even I'm pretty apathetic about it.

I just hate the attacks that I think are low blows or cheap shots.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Waaaaaah, poor baby needs his bottle. :frown:

Who needs the bottle...Dr. Paul?

I'd sure need something strong after a defeat like that! 😛

Your "Waterloo" will be coming soon enough and it will hurt much more then 2006 did. How long after that was it before you limped back into P&N again???
 
The simple point is, Hillary is no longer the front runner and Obama is. So to a certain extent the new games becomes for Edward and Hillary to beat up on Obama. And if Obama can't take the heat, hits a scandal, or makes a mis step, Hillary can get right back in it as Ms. inevitable.

Its a wee mite premature to call Obama the winner after one primary. And now that the spotlight is off and the pressure is off Hillary, her political options open up and the pressure is on Obama. Who will also catch hell from the Republican side.
 
I was listening to the radio at lunch today, and they were talking about how even though at the caucus you had HUGE turnout for Obama, of course Hillary and Edwards would still get a single delegate. I don't quite understand the entire process, but apparently the 38% number is quite deceiving, in a popular vote in Iowa Obama would have been well over 50%. That and the almost double turnout to vote (with again a large percentage of first time voters voting for Obama) spells big trouble for Billary. People now believe there is a viable, electable alternative and I predict while she'll go down fighting, she won't be able to overcome the independent and first timer draw he has (plus drawing close to 50% from the dem base).
 
Originally posted by: Lemon law
The simple point is, Hillary is no longer the front runner and Obama is. So to a certain extent the new games becomes for Edward and Hillary to beat up on Obama. And if Obama can't take the heat, hits a scandal, or makes a mis step, Hillary can get right back in it as Ms. inevitable.

Its a wee mite premature to call Obama the winner after one primary. And now that the spotlight is off and the pressure is off Hillary, her political options open up and the pressure is on Obama. Who will also catch hell from the Republican side.

Obama is not the front runner for winning Iowa any more then Huckabee is the front runner for winning Iowa. Obama is still down by more then 20 points nationally. Does this mean that he can't beat Hillary? Of course not. I find it very unlikely though, and she is still definitely the front runner. At least Huckabee is now polling in the lead nationally, albeit by a small margin. Does anyone here seriously think Huckabee is going to win the nomination though? Was John McCain suddenly the front runner when he won NH and Michigan in 2000? Of course not.
 
if Hillary is solidly defeated in NH, I'd think she'd give it up, though probably not if it was a close race.

I mean, if you want to play the electoral game, she really came in second in Iowa 😉

but I'd like to think that after suffering one of the worst campaigns in history and losing what should have been a cake walk in 2004, the dems won't beat eachother up too much.
 

Originally posted by: Pabster
Bill Clinton Takes Swipe At Media: They 'Made' Hillary Go Negative!

Ah, the Lone Ranger to the rescue :laugh:

How does it feel to know you agree with over 2/3 of the Democratic voters in Iowa and a large number of the rest of your favorite Democrats that Hillary wouldn't be the best candidate? :shocked:

But keep posting, troll. :thumbsup: :laugh:
 
Originally posted by: Harvey
How does it feel to know you agree with over 2/3 of the Democratic voters in Iowa and a large number of the rest of your favorite Democrats that Hillary wouldn't be the best candidate? :shocked:

Great. Now there's just 1/3 left to get off the Kool Aid.

But keep posting, troll. :thumbsup: :laugh:

I will. Thanks. :thumbsup:
 
Back
Top