• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Hillary Denies White House Run In Trouble

Page 26 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Harvey
So? What's your interest in all of this? Last I heard, you were still pimping for your TRAITOR IN CHIEF and his criminal cabal.

I'd rather see Edwards or Obama as the Democratic Party's nominee.

The whole traitor-in-chief bit is getting a little old admin..

 
omg I get the same feeling when i watch someone being embarrassed as i get watching her chant "yes we will". Washington turns people into robots. Like how she kept repeating "lets have that conversation" she just can't pull crap like that off.
 
so this kid... he goes to a Clinton rally, he spends his whole time during a former president's speech heckling him and being a downright pain in the ass punk kid douchebag... and then he asks the president to stop the bickering and accuses him of bullying? :laugh:
 
What was funny here were the Clinton staff apologizing for Bill's behavior. :laugh:

She's done a pretty decent job of keeping him low-key the last 2 weeks, but you have to wonder how long that can last.

Bill's losing it.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
What was funny here were the Clinton staff apologizing for Bill's behavior. :laugh:

She's done a pretty decent job of keeping him low-key the last 2 weeks, but you have to wonder how long that can last.

Bill's losing it.

WRONG.

Several Clinton supporters who saw the exchange came up to Holeman after to -- shall we say delicately -- express their disapproval for his actions.

They were not apologizing for Clinton. "His" refers to the heckler, not Bill. No apology required, the guy was obviously being an asshole.

Nice try at distorting reality, as usual.
 
Looks like the weather killed three Clinton rallies today. She spent the day in a diner and a Hispanic grocery store. Not great for someone who arrived yesterday and is leaving tomorrow.
 
Originally posted by: mflacy
Looks like the weather killed three Clinton rallies today. She spent the day in a diner and a Hispanic grocery store. Not great for someone who arrived yesterday and is leaving tomorrow.
good.
 
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
I fail to see how this is "losing it" - he does a good job, I think, of arguing his own and his wife's position without losing control.

I'm referring to him being back on the campaign trail, not any specific event or commentary. It is amusing that he is back front and center after his dismal performance in South Carolina.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
I fail to see how this is "losing it" - he does a good job, I think, of arguing his own and his wife's position without losing control.

I'm referring to him being back on the campaign trail, not any specific event or commentary. It is amusing that he is back front and center after his dismal performance in South Carolina.

😕 Then why did you use the title "Clinton loses it again; attacks pro-lifers"? I don't see how he's losing it in that clip, nor how he is attacking anyone.
 
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
I fail to see how this is "losing it" - he does a good job, I think, of arguing his own and his wife's position without losing control.

I'm referring to him being back on the campaign trail, not any specific event or commentary. It is amusing that he is back front and center after his dismal performance in South Carolina.

😕 Then why did you use the title "Clinton loses it again; attacks pro-lifers"? I don't see how he's losing it in that clip, nor how he is attacking anyone.

If you're looking for fair and balanced updates on the clinton campaign I think you'll have a better shot at Fox than in Pabster's thread. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
War Over Words: Desperate Clinton Team Accuses Obama Of 'Plagiarism'

Boy, they're really grasping at straws.

They seem to think plagarism is just about words. Its also about ideas. And well they've been using Obamas rhetorical ideas since Iowa.

Clinton's campaign is backing off slightly. When asked if they can say they havent lifted other peoples words without consent or citation, they simply said they cannot say they havent used other peoples words. They go on to say, it doesn't matter if Clinton did. "Plagarism" only matters with Obama because hes running a "campaign of rhetoric".

Talk about grasping at straws.
 
Of all Pabster's recent links, the only one remotely interesting is "Will Wisconsin Loss Doom Hillary?" and that one doesn't really predict a loss, just discusses what the ramifications will be.

To me, tonight's Wisconsin results will be pretty interesting. I lived there for much of my young adult life (mid-seventies to late eighties) and was very familiar with it's political culture (back then). To my view, this is going to another real close one, could go either way. Both Hillary Clinton and Obama have been actively stumping in WI, neither is conceding it.

From my extremely unscientific view (casual phonecalls and emails with old friends and acquaintances) Hillary Clinton has a lot more support in WI than is apparent.

Politically, Wisconsin is extremely similar to New York state. A mostly rural state with one large city (Milwaukee) that is the 800 lb gorilla. Milwaukee is a one party city (Dem of course) but that party is extremely diverse. Milwaukee is unlike most US cities in that it has a very large white (mostly blue collar Polish) population. The Milwaukee vote will not be totally decided by race.

Wisconsin also has Madison/Dane County, which is a totally collegiate & governemental town, a hotbed of political activism. Think of Madison as the Grand Rapids/Berkeley of the midwest.

The rest of Wisconsin is pretty rural with the occassional small city, like Sheboygan, Green Bay, etc.

Race to my view is going to be a nonfactor with Wisconsin's white population.

Despite tech's repeated assertion that Wisconsin is one of the most liberal states around, this is a bunch of hooey. Wisconsin may be considered more liberal than most places (a hundred years ago socialism was dominant there) but that is more because their politics are almost totally corruption free and while highly taxed, most feel that the government is actually wisely spending the money. It's refreshing to be in a place where calling someone a liberal is not meant as a slander. Anyway Clinton and Obama are almost identical in substantive political stances, to me the "liberalness" is a nonfactor. Remember too, that Wisconsin was the home of the notorious Joe McCarthy.

The fact that Obama's base is Chicago is a nonfactor. To any true Wisconsinite, Chicago is depised, the endless traffic jam you must go through to go East. Think Red Sox vs. Yankess rivalry, that is how Illinois and Chicago are viewed.

There are two important factors that will be played out in today's WI primary. First, it will be a test of voters' remaining loyalty to Hillary Clinton (and Bill Clinton). This remains Hillary's biggest strength, together with feminists that want to see the first woman president. The other main factor is the economy. WI (and especially the Milwaukee area) has a lot of heavy industry with good paying, blue collar jobs that are drifting away. Times aren't as desperate as in Michigan, but who can best help the economy is going to be a very major consideration.
 
Back
Top