Hillary Campaign tool its funny

[Fanatical Meat]

I'd be bankrupt but this is simple and funny

Her campaign has launched a fundraising tool called Troll Trump that lets people automatically donate to Clinton every time Trump tweets.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/20/technology/troll-trump-fundraising-tool/index.html?iid=hp-stack-dom

 

[PokerGuy]

That is actually kind of clever and funny. I'm sure there are plenty of idiots that will give away their money.....

 

[HamburgerBoy]

That Monopoly-man Trump is the cutest thing ever though.

 

[AnonymouseUser]

I would say Trump should troll them by tweeting more, but I'm sure Clinton will troll them herself:

Hillary Clinton Campaign Systematically Overcharging Poorest Donors

Hillary Clinton’s campaign is stealing from her poorest supporters by purposefully and repeatedly overcharging them after they make what’s supposed to be a one-time small donation through her official campaign website, multiple sources tell the Observer.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

I would say Trump should troll them by tweeting more, but I'm sure Clinton will troll them herself:

Hillary Clinton Campaign Systematically Overcharging Poorest Donors

Excellent make a thread about it.

 

[AnonymouseUser]

Why? This is related.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Why? This is related.

Over Charging or Over Clicking?
http://www.snopes.com/clinton-campaign-overcharging-donors/

It's possible that the single complainant (on whom the entire Observer article was based) inadvertently signed up for a recurring donation, accidentally triggered multiple charges by clicking "submit" more than once, and/or was simply the victim of an isolated glitch that caused the duplicate charges. Without additional documentation, it's difficult to verify that the issue demonstrates (as the Observer suggested) a deliberate and pervasive form of fraud.

But it is worthy of its own topic.

 

[allisolm]

I would say Trump should troll them by tweeting more, but I'm sure Clinton will troll them herself:

Hillary Clinton Campaign Systematically Overcharging Poorest Donors

from the website published by Donald Trump's son -in-law.

 

[AnonymouseUser]

from the website published by Donald Trump's son -in-law.

Yes, the disclaimer is right in the article (aka, ethics).

Disclosure: Donald Trump is the father-in-law of Jared Kushner, the publisher of Observer Media.

 

[brycejones]

Yes, the disclaimer is right in the article (aka, ethics).

So is there evidence of this happening to large numbers of people or is this based on a single person's story? If the latter the article is nothing more than click bait.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

So is there evidence of this happening to large numbers of people or is this based on a single person's story? If the latter the article is nothing more than click bait.

From another article 3 people reported it, 2 didn't show any proof they even donated 3rd is this woman's bank statement.

 

[fskimospy]

I would say Trump should troll them by tweeting more, but I'm sure Clinton will troll them herself:
Hillary Clinton Campaign Systematically Overcharging Poorest Donors

Looks like you got duped again. You guys are such easy marks.

I'm terrified for how badly Trump is going to scam people like you after the election.

 

[AnonymouseUser]

So is there evidence of this happening to large numbers of people or is this based on a single person's story? If the latter the article is nothing more than click bait.

Here's another story from 2008 suggesting a history of fraud, from the pro-Clinton rag DailyKos:

Credit card fraud from Hillary's campaign?

 

[fskimospy]

Here's another story from 2008 suggesting a history of fraud, from the pro-Clinton rag DailyKos:

Credit card fraud from Hillary's campaign?

Try again!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines

Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no.

 

[brycejones]

Here's another story from 2008 suggesting a history of fraud, from the pro-Clinton rag DailyKos:

Credit card fraud from Hillary's campaign?

See fski's reply, plus anything from this election cycle? So far you have 1 instance and a clickbait headline and story from a website run by someone closely linked to Trump.

 

[AnonymouseUser]

Well, you take your chances if you wish to dance with the devil.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Well, you take your chances if you wish to dance with the devil.

So that's a no

 

[dainthomas]

Is it possible to have a funny political thread without it getting derailed by stupid Drumpf trolls? Why don't you people post in one of the gajillion other threads?

 

[Jhhnn]

Over Charging or Over Clicking?
http://www.snopes.com/clinton-campaign-overcharging-donors/



But its is worthy of its own topic.

It doesn't even pass the sniff test. I'm sure Jillary has tens if not hundreds of thousands of small donors. If this were a regular thing, it would be a lot more than one person.

 

[brycejones]

Well, you take your chances if you wish to dance with the devil.

So nothing

 

[ivwshane]

Well, you take your chances if you wish to dance with the devil.

Mean while anonymousUser promenades with trump, a guy who is currently involved in a fraud case as well as having settled cases of illegal conduct and who has a history of not paying on his contracts.


But yeah we will go ahead and dance with the devil according to the guy who's actively reading, parroting, and buys into propaganda.

Lol

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Is it possible to have a funny political thread without it getting derailed by stupid Drumpf trolls? Why don't you people post in one of the gajillion other threads?

How come your avatar has better resolution?