theeedude
Lifer
Originally posted by: mrCide
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: senseamp
The only exaggeration I see here is from Hillary bashers who try to make it sound like she doesn't have experience because she didn't get wounded in Bosnia. And if she did get wounded, she'd still get bashed like John Kerry did for not getting wounded bad enough, and if she was really wounded bad enough, she would be bashed like Max Cleland for not getting killed or not being patriotic. It's typical Rovian swiftboater ammo, and it's pretty disgusting, but par for the course for Clinton bashers.
No, the "exaggeration" is from the Clinton trolls like yourself, as usual.
Hillary said verbatim that she remembered vividly events which simply did not occur. Reminds me of John Kerry "vividly" recalling Christmas time in Cambodia. LOL!
People misremember things from that long ago.
Plus that CBS piece is biased. Just because there was no sniper fire hitting them, doesn't mean there was no risk of sniper fire in the area. They don't have sandbags on that outpost for flood control.
Maj. Gen. William Nash, who has since retired but was then the commander of United States troops in Bosnia and was at the Tuzla airport that day, said in an interview that there was no threat of sniper fire at the airport during Mrs. Clinton?s visit. He said she was gracious during her visit and took pictures with the soldiers, who were there to enforce the terms of the Dayton peace accord, signed five months earlier.
?She never had her head down,? General Nash said. ?There was no sniper threat that I know of.?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03.../25clinton.html?ref=us
really?
That doesn't mean she wasn't told there would be a sniper threat by the secret service.
You really don't get the difference?