Hillary Aides Caught Planting Question

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Story here.
Here as well.

I'm shocked, I tell ya. With Hillary running around accusing people of being "plants" at several campaign stops, here we have a perfect example of a hypocrite. In true Clintonian fashion. She's invented "the politics of the plant".
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
Story here.
Here as well.

I'm shocked, I tell ya. With Hillary running around accusing people of being "plants" at several campaign stops, here we have a perfect example of a hypocrite. In true Clintonian fashion. She's invented "the politics of the plant".
No I think Bush or at least Bushes Handlers started that a few years ago. Doesn't matter, they are all corrupt and full of shit. I hope miore stuff like this happens to both 9-11 and Hildabeast when they are nominated so the American Voter may look elsewhere for their president (though I sincerly doubt it)
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Leave it to Red to bring up Bush in a thread about Hillary! :laugh:

You're right about the corruption though. I think they all do it, she just got caught red handed.

As for voters looking elsewhere, not until a campaign can be taken full term for less than $400 to $500 million bucks.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Yeh, Riight, Pabster. Having one account from one person isn't exactly getting caught red-handed, not like what we've seen from the Bushista information control machine. And, uhh, the likelihood of just such a question coming up spontaneously is really rather large, anyway.

More of the "they're just as bad!" sour grapes from the wingers. Not much of a recommendation for your own team, Pabster...
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Another apologist arrives on-scene.

Where are your buddies? They're really slacking today.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
I saw this this morning...the sliminess of Hillary is starting to shine :) I can hear the Democratic apologists now...

I love it. Exposing the lying cheating b1tch she is :D
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
Yeh, Riight, Pabster. Having one account from one person isn't exactly getting caught red-handed, not like what we've seen from the Bushista information control machine. And, uhh, the likelihood of just such a question coming up spontaneously is really rather large, anyway.

More of the "they're just as bad!" sour grapes from the wingers. Not much of a recommendation for your own team, Pabster...

Hey dumbass what part of "The Clinton campaign has admitted to planting questions in Iowa" do you not understand? Jesus.

Need another source? Here
 

Uhtrinity

Platinum Member
Dec 21, 2003
2,263
202
106
Anyone who plants questions is flat out wrong, whether it be Hillary, FEMA, or our beloved White House (Gannon anyone?). Pab, if you're gonna bitch about it at least be consistent. Don't remember you getting on Bush about the whole Gannon / Talon News fiasco, or the fed planting fake news stories few years back.

Actually I took a look at the FEMA thread again and the only thing you bitched about was Dave.
 

Siddhartha

Lifer
Oct 17, 1999
12,505
3
81
SIOUX CITY, Iowa ? Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton?s campaign admitted Friday that it planted a global warming question in Newton, Iowa, Tuesday during a town hall meeting to discuss clean energy.

Clinton campaign spokesman Mo Elliethee admitted that the campaign had planted the question and said it would not happen again.

"On this occasion a member of our staff did discuss a possible question about Senator Clinton's energy plan at a forum,? Elliethee said.

?However, Senator Clinton did not know which questioners she was calling on during the event. This is not standard policy and will not be repeated again.?

In a state where the caucus is held sacred and the impromptu and candid style of the town hall meeting is held dear, Clinton?s planted question may come as a great offense to Iowans.

According to a report on the Grinnell University Web site, the Clinton campaign arranged for some of the questions for the candidate to be asked by college students:

"On Tuesday Nov. 6, the Clinton campaign stopped at a biodiesel plant in Newton as part of a weeklong series of events to introduce her new energy plan. The event was clearly intended to be as much about the press as the Iowa voters in attendance, as a large press core helped fill the small venue....

"After her speech, Clinton accepted questions. But according to Grinnell College student Muriel Gallo-Chasanoff ?10, some of the questions from the audience were planned in advance. 'They were canned,' she said. Before the event began, a Clinton staff member approached Gallo-Chasanoff to ask a specific question after Clinton?s speech. 'One of the senior staffers told me what [to ask],' she said.

"Clinton called on Gallo-Chasanoff after her speech to ask a question: what Clinton would do to stop the effects of global warming. Clinton began her response by noting that young people often pose this question to her before delving into the benefits of her plan.

"But the source of the question was no coincidence ? at this event 'they wanted a question from a college student,' Gallo-Chasanoff said."

The tape of the event shows that the question and answer went as follows:

Question: "As a young person, I'm worried about the long-term effects of global warming How does your plan combat climate change?

Clinton: "Well, you should be worried. You know, I find as I travel around Iowa that it's usually young people that ask me about global warming."

The campaign's admission that it planted the question may be another blow to the New York senator's image as a trustworthy politician.

Clinton's critics have accused her of being a double-talker who refuses to answer tough questions specifically. Now her campaign has acknowledged planting at least one question.

Already her rivals have begun to criticize Friday's revelation.

?In light of a weak debate performance, not to mention a persistent inability to answer the tough questions, it appears the Clinton campaign has adopted a new strategy of planting questions,? John Edwards? Communications Director Chris Kofinis said.

?It?s what the Clinton campaign calls the politics of planting"


Her staff asking people to ask her questions about global warming is not a deal breaker for me.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: Siddhartha

Her staff asking people to ask her questions about global warming is not a deal breaker for me.

So it's the content that determines whether it's right or wrong? Let me ask this...what question, that could be planted, WOULD be a deal breaker? Or is it OK to plant questions?
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Siddhartha

Her staff asking people to ask her questions about global warming is not a deal breaker for me.

So it's the content that determines whether it's right or wrong? Let me ask this...what question, that could be planted, WOULD be a deal breaker? Or is it OK to plant questions?
I don't have a problem with it as long as most of the questions asked aren't planted. I'm sure it happens on both sides to some extent.
 

Corbett

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
3,074
0
76
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
Yeh, Riight, Pabster. Having one account from one person isn't exactly getting caught red-handed, not like what we've seen from the Bushista information control machine. And, uhh, the likelihood of just such a question coming up spontaneously is really rather large, anyway.

More of the "they're just as bad!" sour grapes from the wingers. Not much of a recommendation for your own team, Pabster...

Nomination for self-pwnage of the year!
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
It was an aberration her campaign said will not be repeated. Since it is an attack by the republicans in this thread, it's fair to contrast her minor incident to the policies of 'selected' audiences of the Bush campaigns, and the campaign that was especially corrupt with this sort of thing, Nixon '68 - read "The Selling of the President 1968", a very revealing book.

From blackangst's own article, it indicates Hillary was calling on who she wanted, and getting a lot of questions that weren't 'friendly':

"...Clinton used her discretion to select questions and called on people who had not been prepped beforehand. Some of the questions asked were confusing and clearly off-message."

Clinton Campaign spokesperson Mo Elleithee tells ABC News that "on this occasion a member of our staff did discuss a possible question about Sen. Clinton's energy plan at a forum. However, Sen. Clinton did not know which questioners she was calling on during the event. This is not standard policy and will not be repeated again."

So yet again we have the cult right yammering about the left doing some small sliver of what their side does as they're in utter denial, hiding behind the 'principle' they apply very selectively not because they care about it - if they did they'd apply it to their side too - but because they are only trying for a partisan point, as always.
 

cliftonite

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2001
6,900
63
91
Originally posted by: Pabster
Leave it to Red to bring up Bush in a thread about Hillary! :laugh:

You're right about the corruption though. I think they all do it, she just got caught red handed.

As for voters looking elsewhere, not until a campaign can be taken full term for less than $400 to $500 million bucks.

Similar to how you bring up Clinton in every other thread.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: senseamp
Yawn, another Hillary bashing circle jerk. Nothing to see here, move along.

Another apologist. What a suprise.

Where did I apologize for her in that post? Seems like you are the one apologizing for being obsessed with Hillary.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
Story here.
Here as well.

I'm shocked, I tell ya. With Hillary running around accusing people of being "plants" at several campaign stops, here we have a perfect example of a hypocrite. In true Clintonian fashion. She's invented "the politics of the plant".

Anyone who trusts a politician is NOT PATRIOTIC .. they are dee duh dee
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Pabster
Story here.
Here as well.

I'm shocked, I tell ya. With Hillary running around accusing people of being "plants" at several campaign stops, here we have a perfect example of a hypocrite. In true Clintonian fashion. She's invented "the politics of the plant".

Anyone who trusts a politician is NOT PATRIOTIC .. they are dee duh dee

I disagree. Some are more trustworthy than others, and trust is to a degree.

For example, I'd largely trust Robert Kennedy - but not when it came to letting out negative info about his family.

I largely trust Henry Waxman today. Can you show me any reason why he doesn't deserve it?
 

Sinsear

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2007
6,439
80
91
Surprise, surprise; poor Hillary doesn't want to answer real questions but rather planted questions with rehearsed answers. That woman disgusts me more and more each day. :thumbsdown::|:thumbsdown:
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
Leave it to Red to bring up Bush in a thread about Hillary! :laugh:

You're right about the corruption though. I think they all do it, she just got caught red handed.

As for voters looking elsewhere, not until a campaign can be taken full term for less than $400 to $500 million bucks.

Well you claim to object to "planted questions", yet you only object when HILLARY is doing it. Bush has been doing it for years and you jokers haven't been able to summon up the energy to care.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Pabster
Another apologist arrives on-scene.

Where are your buddies? They're really slacking today.

Falling all over ourselves cracking up watching you original apologists.

The fact you guys are calling Hillary supporters apologists is quite a hoot.

Awesome job Hillary and Co have done learning from the best, you guys. :thumbsup:

Even putting shills in the audience. :laugh:

It's a beautiful thing. :lips: :heart:

Be even more beautiful should she win next year. :D