• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Higher mortgage rates to bite

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I mean, the median home value in Sacramento is $400k with an average annual household income of less than $50k. Families grossing $4k per month cannot afford $3k per house payments. This is very simple math.
I don't know how the hell people do it!



same here in the DC area....it sucks
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: jadinolf
I wonder how many of you remember 12% on home loans?
I was lucky since my highest was 9 1/2%
I remember refinancing people out of 12% mortgages into 9%'s (and everyone thought 9% was a GREAT rate).

<- in mortgage biz since 1994.

Yep. Alive since 1934.
 
when I bought my place almost 2 years ago, the seller said he paid some crazy double digit rate when he bought it in the 1980's. A few years ago everyone thought 7% was as low as it would go. Now if rates go up to 7% people are panicking at the thought.

I think the biggest problem is the ARM people who are about to start paying hundreds of $$$ more on their mortages every month. If the walk away en masse then there will be problems. But I don't know if millions of people will willfully trash their credit score for the next decade.

I personally think we will see either flat home prices for the next decade or a slight drop with no panic. Everyone and their brother is predicting a bubble burst and anarchy and that is probably the biggest reason why it won't happen.
 
It's funny how so many people don't realize how screwed they are.
You can only borrow so much.
 
Originally posted by: alent1234
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: alent1234
there is a big discussion on fatwallet about this

Some people in California and other markets are buying homes with interest only loans with plans to sell them when the principal payments begin. there are also a ton of people out there who have ARM's that will soon adjust to a higher rate and they won't be able to afford their mortgage payments.

Guess what happens next?
OWNAGE

EDIT: Actually the total opposite of ownage, because they will not own much when they get foreclosed.

But in 2-3 years time there may be a lot of nice homes to choose from at nice prices. now if only my company will go IPO by that time i can pay cash for a home and not worry about a mortgage anymore.

If home prices do fall people losing money is not the only problem. A lot of states asses property taxes based on a homes current value. In the NYC suburbs there are homes that carry $6000 property tax bills because they are in good school districts. What if the value of those homes falls and property tax receipts go down with them?


Unless I am not recalling correctly, the taxes my parents paid on their 175k Long Island home were at least 5k 4 years ago.
 
I'm not really worried for myself (only owe 10% of home value) but even the people who can afford their mortgage could suffer if the rise in rates causes a bunch of people to lose their homes because they stretched too far.

When a lot of people get foreclosed on, those homes have to be sold because the bank doesn't want to own them. If $300K homes get sold for $200K, that's fine with the bank. And it sucks for the neighbors who can still afford their home because they just saw the value of their own home sink like a rock, and did nothing wrong.
 
Originally posted by: alent1234
there is a big discussion on fatwallet about this

Some people in California and other markets are buying homes with interest only loans with plans to sell them when the principal payments begin. there are also a ton of people out there who have ARM's that will soon adjust to a higher rate and they won't be able to afford their mortgage payments.

Guess what happens next?

heh i was reading that thread today, almost made me crap my pants and I don't even own a house.

 
Aren't lenders greedy for extending interest-only loans, zero-down loans, and ARMs to 'marginal' borrowers.
 
No, they aren't greedy. They are offering a product, and it's up to the individual whether to buy it or not.

There are situations where an interest-only loan is the right choice for some people, but unfortunately too many people jump on it as a way to buy a house that's really too expensive for them.
 
Originally posted by: HappyPuppy
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: jadinolf
Yep. Alive since 1934.
Damn, gramps... are you the oldest on AT?



Damn, I thought I was an old phart! 😛
This doesn't let you off the hook :Q
Everyone and their brother is predicting a bubble burst and anarchy and that is probably the biggest reason why it won't happen.
Or it may be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: alent1234
there is a big discussion on fatwallet about this

Some people in California and other markets are buying homes with interest only loans with plans to sell them when the principal payments begin. there are also a ton of people out there who have ARM's that will soon adjust to a higher rate and they won't be able to afford their mortgage payments.

Guess what happens next?
If rates spike up, CA is going down IMO.
Even if values don't drop some 25% or more, their economy will be badly damaged for the reasons given in this article at the very least. Homeowners won't be able to live off of refinancing to a lower rate and cashing out of their equity any more. Some might not think this is a big deal, but when I was in the Sacramento area this past December, it did not escape my notice that 2 big brand new malls had been built in the areas (Roseville and Folsolm) that had seen the largest property value appreciations in the past few years. Consumers run up their credit cards at the malls, then refinance their homes to pay them off.

And not that they don't deserve what's coming, if you'll pardon me. My mother-in-law bought her house outside Roseville in '97 for $120k and it is worth $420k today (1300 sq ft 30 miles NE of Sacramento btw). That's a 350% increase in 8 years, or an average of almost 44% per year! Surely no one thought that this type of appreciation could go on forever....

The sign of impending doom for me was when borrowers started taking out those ARMs and interest-only's a year or so ago. Because I knew it was because they could no longer afford the fully amortized fixed rate payments anymore. I mean, the median home value in Sacramento is $400k with an average annual household income of less than $50k. Families grossing $4k per month cannot afford $3k per house payments. This is very simple math.


Aye, I had quite a few conversations with colleagues about this very thing. The # of folks who overextended themselves into property they had no business owning via arms was a hefty percentage of the business I did. A lot of others were refinancing their homes into Arms into order to cash out for various frivolous expenditures (boats, etc etc). Not the brightest lot.
 
Originally posted by: Banana
Aren't lenders greedy for extending interest-only loans, zero-down loans, and ARMs to 'marginal' borrowers.

Most banks don't lend their own funds. They take funds from mutual funds that invest in mortgage backed securities and only service the loans. The people to blame are the ones investing in these funds along with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

 
Originally posted by: kranky
No, they aren't greedy. They are offering a product, and it's up to the individual whether to buy it or not.

There are situations where an interest-only loan is the right choice for some people, but unfortunately too many people jump on it as a way to buy a house that's really too expensive for them.

Agreed. Arms and interest-only are great loans but the borrower has to be aware of their needs. A young up and coming couple is a great candidate for a 5 or 7 ARM for example because statistics dictate that they will invariably relocate, move up etc before the 5 or 7 years is up. Likewise, people that need cash flow such as business owners could make practical use out of an option/interest-only loan. Unfortanately it's rarely the case when a pragmatic decision was the impetus for selecting a variable rate loan.
 
interest only loans were traditionally given as bridge loans and to investors. For example I have family moving from NYC to the midwest soon. They are going to sell their place here and buy a house in the midwest. Say they buy a home before selling their place here. They would get an interest only loan, sell the place and then pay it off. Too bad now they are being used by the wrong people.
 
hmm i really do not feel sorry for them. If people lose there houses because they can not afford it that is there problem.

hmm maybe i can get a nice house on a lake for cheap in few years.


the first house i baught in 96 was at 9% on a 250 farmhouse! ugh i was young and dumb had to work my rear off to pay for it. Now locked in at a nice 4.75% on a 150k house. heheh i just giggle every time i think of that.
 
Originally posted by: jadinolf
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: jadinolf
I wonder how many of you remember 12% on home loans?
I was lucky since my highest was 9 1/2%
I remember refinancing people out of 12% mortgages into 9%'s (and everyone thought 9% was a GREAT rate).

<- in mortgage biz since 1994.

Yep. Alive since 1934.

Sweet criminy, I don't know how you put up with us.
 
Back
Top