Darkstar757
Diamond Member
Does anyone here have any experience in High Risk stocks. I have a few questions i need answered.
Thanks😕
Thanks😕
Well, it's not generating cash. Never good to have a negative amount of cash flow from operations. Then again, they are new.Originally posted by: ajpa123
Finova group probably falls into that category.. fnvg.ob. My neighbor who uses my computer to access his online brokerage account, follows it and buys some for his grand-daughter from time to time.. it's only $0.73. I know nothing about it execpt that its stock price climbed when Warren Buffett showed interest in it.. now it's back down to reality. Anyone know anything about this stock?
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Well, it's not generating cash. Never good to have a negative amount of cash flow from operations. Then again, they are new.Originally posted by: ajpa123
Finova group probably falls into that category.. fnvg.ob. My neighbor who uses my computer to access his online brokerage account, follows it and buys some for his grand-daughter from time to time.. it's only $0.73. I know nothing about it execpt that its stock price climbed when Warren Buffett showed interest in it.. now it's back down to reality. Anyone know anything about this stock?
ZV
Yup, just responded. Lemme know if you got it.Originally posted by: Darkstar757
did you get my pm?Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Well, it's not generating cash. Never good to have a negative amount of cash flow from operations. Then again, they are new.Originally posted by: ajpa123
Finova group probably falls into that category.. fnvg.ob. My neighbor who uses my computer to access his online brokerage account, follows it and buys some for his grand-daughter from time to time.. it's only $0.73. I know nothing about it execpt that its stock price climbed when Warren Buffett showed interest in it.. now it's back down to reality. Anyone know anything about this stock?
ZV
Originally posted by: Darkstar757
So would everyone agree vandguard is the best to go with
Originally posted by: richardycc
$500 is too little to play with, $2000 is the min to get into some of the less risky stocks, $500 will limit yourself to penny stocks, those are very very risky.
Originally posted by: Darkstar757
So would everyone agree vandguard is the best to go with
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I would stop deluding yourself. Beating the market is exceptionally difficult. The average, experienced, investor cannot even beat the market - and you want to come in knowing nothing about it and kick ass and take names? Say goodbye to your $500.
Well, I didn't read the thread - so any post of mine was general and not in response to anything. I'm merely reiterating, as I always do, that the average joe will stand to lose money trying to place the market in this manner when compared to the gains they'll get by a less hands-on approach, such as in index fund.Originally posted by: Hector13
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I would stop deluding yourself. Beating the market is exceptionally difficult. The average, experienced, investor cannot even beat the market - and you want to come in knowing nothing about it and kick ass and take names? Say goodbye to your $500.
there is a big difference between beating the market and "doubling down" on the market like I was suggesting. Leveraging up on the market obviously doesn't mean you will "beat the market". You will get higher returns on the way up, but also bigger losses on the way down.
But, if you have a lot of time, are willing to take on more risk, and believe that over time, the market will go up... then taking a super high beta bet is exactly what you want to do. It is better than looking for more risk in individual stocks or micro cap funds.
Best single piece of advice I've ever read on an internet forum about stock investing.Originally posted by: Michael
If you think about what you'll have 10 years from now instead of next week, you'll do much better.
Michael
It still goes up by the same amount. If you buy 10 shares of something at $50 and it goes up 5% you end up with an investment worth $525.Originally posted by: IBuyUFO
some mutual funds are as high as $70. You'll get no more than 7 shares if you get the fidelity manager's special. 🙂
You both make good points. Even with an exceptional fund manager an actively traded fund that tries to "time the market" will often no outperform the market by enough to make up for the increased amount of fees it incurs. In other words, the gross return (before fees and other frictions like bid/ask spreads) is sometimes better, but the net return (after fees and other frictions) is almost always worse than the market average.Originally posted by: Skoorb
Well, I didn't read the thread - so any post of mine was general and not in response to anything. I'm merely reiterating, as I always do, that the average joe will stand to lose money trying to place the market in this manner when compared to the gains they'll get by a less hands-on approach, such as in index fund.Originally posted by: Hector13
there is a big difference between beating the market and "doubling down" on the market like I was suggesting. Leveraging up on the market obviously doesn't mean you will "beat the market". You will get higher returns on the way up, but also bigger losses on the way down.Originally posted by: Skoorb
I would stop deluding yourself. Beating the market is exceptionally difficult. The average, experienced, investor cannot even beat the market - and you want to come in knowing nothing about it and kick ass and take names? Say goodbye to your $500.
But, if you have a lot of time, are willing to take on more risk, and believe that over time, the market will go up... then taking a super high beta bet is exactly what you want to do. It is better than looking for more risk in individual stocks or micro cap funds.