Thanks to all, esp. Fox5. I'm going to further check those options to see what, if not equals, comes close to Apple quality/performance.
I do not need something as thin a profile as macbook air. Macbook profile is fine.
The macbook with dualboot might be a good option. This however means I would need to purchase Windows 8 on my own i presume... anyone have any experience with this setup as ones primary computer? I would think there might be driver issues and other obstacles? I really want a dummy proof setup and am not inclined to spend the time having to "make something work."
It seems a bit sad that the PC market has still not caught up with Apple in terms of product quality. In the cellphone market, for example, my opinion is that Samsung now has options superior to Apple in terms of performance (apples are still better built, but with a good case and other protectors, even samsungs are good enough).
I guess I don't really NEED discrete graphics, however I do use photoshop from time to time and as it will be my primary computer I wanted an allrounder. This is one area in which I can compromise.
Apple has a nice niche: They're the Beats of computers - quality for people who don't know what quality is, but think more with their eyes. Sadly there are a lot more of those idiots out there.
Like Bose or other makes which rely on marketing, they have excellent customer service, so that among other things when inevitably something breaks when you try to use it for the purpose it's supposed to be suitable for, the repair process is relatively painless - though there's significant downtime nevertheless if you're racking up those Store or collect and return visits. But if all you've had is crap before, this might be an amazing experience. For me personally it's a major annoyance, even with site support.
You can find genuine quality along the lines of the HP Elitebooks for example, or you can go with Apple with something that looks (boringly IMO) cool and gives you the impression of quality as long as you don't stray outside low-grade computing. A lot of Apple 'pros' overestimate the intensity of their computing, and a lot of budget-orientated pros underestimate the same.
If you want genuine quality, you'll need to spend at least as much as (e.g. as in the case of the Series 9 vs the Air for example), or often more than Apple - but since you can negotiate prices on the PC side with direct sellers, your money can end up going into the machine, not a profit margin.
If you want something like Apple on the other hand, you can spend a bit less but not a whole lot less - that's the mistake a lot of people make I think, in that they say "I'm not buying a $1100 Air, I'm going to spend $500" and end up with a piece of junk.
Bear in mind that Windows is also a substandard experience on a Mac. While you can Boot Camp, it's the worst of both worlds - not only do you have to maintain two OS's, but the environment you might be working in most is subtly crippled so as to make it actually more of a compromise than even a crappier machine which works truly natively in Windows. I often wonder why people are that credulously unaware about the real disadvantages of this - unless you're a dev who doesn't really care about the production quality of the environment, in which case it's not too bad.
And aluminium is not heavy-duty casing: magnesium or carbon is.