Higgs Boson Particle

Status
Not open for further replies.

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
With regards to the LHC experiments which hope to expose this, it seems that the Higgs Boson approaches 100x the size of the a proton before it disappears. First of all, is that factor correct?

With regards to the mass that would be created, is there anywhere I could find information on what attributes it would exhibit such as how strong the cohesive energy would be?
 

Locut0s

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
22,205
44
91
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
With regards to the LHC experiments which hope to expose this, it seems that the Higgs Boson approaches 100x the size of the a proton before it disappears. First of all, is that factor correct?

With regards to the mass that would be created, is there anywhere I could find information on what attributes it would exhibit such as how strong the cohesive energy would be?

Sorry wat?

Are you referring to the expected theoretical mass of the Higgs? Current work puts the expected mass of the Higgs Boson somewhere in the 115-160 GeV range, that is about 122 - 170 times the mass of the proton.
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
With regards to the LHC experiments which hope to expose this, it seems that the Higgs Boson approaches 100x the size of the a proton before it disappears. First of all, is that factor correct?

With regards to the mass that would be created, is there anywhere I could find information on what attributes it would exhibit such as how strong the cohesive energy would be?

Sorry wat?

Are you referring to the expected theoretical mass of the Higgs? Current work puts the expected mass of the Higgs Boson somewhere in the 115-160 GeV range, that is about 122 - 170 times the mass of the proton.

that's exactly what I was looking for :D DO you have a link for that btw?

In addition, do you have any information on the properties that the Higgs Boson will exhibit?
 

Locut0s

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
22,205
44
91
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
With regards to the LHC experiments which hope to expose this, it seems that the Higgs Boson approaches 100x the size of the a proton before it disappears. First of all, is that factor correct?

With regards to the mass that would be created, is there anywhere I could find information on what attributes it would exhibit such as how strong the cohesive energy would be?

Sorry wat?

Are you referring to the expected theoretical mass of the Higgs? Current work puts the expected mass of the Higgs Boson somewhere in the 115-160 GeV range, that is about 122 - 170 times the mass of the proton.

that's exactly what I was looking for :D DO you have a link for that btw?

In addition, do you have any information on the properties that the Higgs Boson will exhibit?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
Goosemaster man... I thought you'd have been on the internet enough to look at wikipedia first :p
 

RESmonkey

Diamond Member
May 6, 2007
4,818
2
0
I'm like halfway through The Elegant Universe; is this particle one of the supposed particles possible, but through some cancellation, only the smaller ones ended being abundant?
 

Locut0s

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
22,205
44
91
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
I'm like halfway through The Elegant Universe; is this particle one of the supposed particles possible, but through some cancellation, only the smaller ones ended being abundant?

Hmm no. Trying to think of what you mean. Can you give more detail? The only such cancellation I can think of is the matter/antimatter puzzle. Matter and antimatter should have been created in equal amounts in the early universe but due to some as yet unknown reason there was a small asymmetry in favour of matter.
 

RESmonkey

Diamond Member
May 6, 2007
4,818
2
0
I'm flipping through the book since I lost my bookmark, and I think I found it. Superpartners?


edit = There was also a page (which I can't find) that said that to find some of the heaviest particles (thought to exist because of string theory), you would need huge particle collider, one bigger than our galaxy in radius. Either it was about that, or trying to find/englarge a "string" to detectable size.
 

Locut0s

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
22,205
44
91
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
I'm flipping through the book since I lost my bookmark, and I think I found it. Superpartners?


edit = There was also a page (which I can't find) that said that to find some of the heaviest particles (thought to exist because of string theory), you would need huge particle collider, one bigger than our galaxy in radius. Either it was about that, or trying to find/englarge a "string" to detectable size.

Well as for the super large particle accelerators that's refering to the releastionship between the power of an accelerator and the length scale down to which it can probe. Most formualtions of string theory posit that strings are on the order of the Plank length 1.6 x10^-35m. In order to achieve energies great enough to probe this length scale would require a particle accelerator something on the order of what you mentioned (the size of the solar system).

Super patterns are a byproduct of Supersymetry. All known particles would end up having a supersymetric counter part. Snutrons, photinos, squarks etc etc... Supersymetry is an integral part of many if not most unification theories.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
I'm like halfway through The Elegant Universe; is this particle one of the supposed particles possible, but through some cancellation, only the smaller ones ended being abundant?

Hmm no. Trying to think of what you mean. Can you give more detail? The only such cancellation I can think of is the matter/antimatter puzzle. Matter and antimatter should have been created in equal amounts in the early universe but due to some as yet unknown reason there was a small asymmetry in favour of matter.

I think it's important to note that simply, there was an asymmetry. While not incorrect, saying that almost all the antimatter is gone, leaving only regular matter, leads to people thinking "how wonderful! Good thing all that exotic stuff is gone, otherwise I wouldn't be here." Had the other stuff been the stuff that was favored by the asymmetry, we'd be calling that stuff matter, and this stuff which is now here wouldn't be here, and would be referred to as anti-matter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.