Question Hi Silicon (Huawei) Proccesor and SoC thread

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,045
763
96
And... it happened. Huawei released another 8000 series processor and is now full custom.


Oh boy...

1747665690330.png

Kirin 8020 is official. And interesting enough... All are Taishan cores
- 1 Big Taishan @ 2.28 Ghz (2 threads)
- 3 Mid Taishan @ 2.05 Ghz (6 Threads)
- 4 Little Taishan @ 1.30 Ghz (no HT)

1747666281135.png
No info for now about the GPU, is likely to be a Maleoon GPU. And no info about the performance, expecting to be on par with SD 865, which with optimizations might end into Vanilla 8 Gen 1 territory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pavlecom

Panino Manino

Golden Member
Jan 28, 2017
1,153
1,398
136
Because of the weaker hardware Huawei needs to compensate in the software.
Good performance improvement on EXT4: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.17-EXT4

EXT4 Shows Wild Gains With Better Block Allocation Scalability In Linux 6.17​

Baokun Li of Huawei has been pursuing better scalability of the EXT4 block allocation code. With Linux servers continuing to have more CPU cores and more containers being loaded on each server, Huawei began noticing scalability issues within the EXT4 file-system driver code. Profiling showed that there was significant contention within EXT4's block allocation/free code path leading to significant performance hits when running many containers atop an EXT4 file-system.

But with a set of 18 patches and after going through three rounds of review, the scalability enhancements to the EXT4 block allocation code are now in Linux 6.17. Simply put, the fallocate operations per container per second are able to come up significantly when looking at the upper percentiles:
 
  • Like
Reactions: pavlecom

Doug S

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2020
3,791
6,717
136
Because of the weaker hardware Huawei needs to compensate in the software.
Good performance improvement on EXT4: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.17-EXT4

Ah man, I ran into this issue on a gig about 10 years ago! Client was using a fully loaded all flash EMC Symmetrix that cost $insanity but performance of a critical component was limited by exactly this issue in ext4. I created a benchmark to demonstrate the problem and sent to it RedHat, but they couldn't reproduce it because they didn't have anything that could handle that amount of I/O (this was before IBM bought them)

After some back and forth with them with it turned out they DID have access to a server with 2 TB of RAM, so after some tweaking on my end to shrink the space requirement they were able to reproduce the issue using a 1.8 TB ext4 on ramfs lol! The client couldn't wait on a fix (though I'm sure they weren't expecting they'd have to wait a decade) so they ended up having to make some fairly major changes to how their application functioned to work around it. And before someone suggests xfs, the reason we were using ext4 was because we'd already run into OTHER problems on xfs...
 

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,045
763
96
Interesting enough... seems that Harmony OS Next is doing miracles in the Kirin 8020 which is an underclocked 9020.

Literally on the tier of the Dimensity 8300. So Kirin 9020 could enter on the realm of the 8400. So they are not that far after all.
1754141402726.jpeg


That made me think... since Huawei is producing more and more Kirins 9020 and 8020, is time to see a 7020 with the defective 8020 with lower scores for the entry devices? With that they can end the Kirin 710, close the direct ARM royalties and only pay for the ARM uArch for the custom ones.

Because of the weaker hardware Huawei needs to compensate in the software.
Good performance improvement on EXT4: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.17-EXT4
With the previous post I made, you are right, they can go full SW to compensate the lack of hardware. And Harmony OS Next is a clear proof of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pavlecom

Panino Manino

Golden Member
Jan 28, 2017
1,153
1,398
136
Interesting enough... seems that Harmony OS Next is doing miracles in the Kirin 8020 which is an underclocked 9020.

Everyone noticed when they released the Pura 80 Ultra with Android, benchmark numbers were horrendous. No improvement or lower numbers than the Pura 70 Ultra.

It goes to show again the advantages of paring hardware and software (except for Google with it's mediocre Tensor).
 
  • Like
Reactions: pavlecom

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,045
763
96
Everyone noticed when they released the Pura 80 Ultra with Android, benchmark numbers were horrendous. No improvement or lower numbers than the Pura 70 Ultra.

It goes to show again the advantages of paring hardware and software (except for Google with it's mediocre Tensor).
Indeed, seems that EMUI OS is done for and Harmony OS is the way to go.

Meanwhile:

If Huawei manages to defeat Tensor G5 from Google it will be a MASSIVE win for them, and a dissaster for Google since has all the tools, but didn't managed to make a decent chip.
 

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,045
763
96
Well. On a pack of news...
Huawei will try to revive the Mate 70
And might use a Kirin 9020A... remember the Kirin 8000A?
I fear that the chip will have less cores... again.

On other news
There are rumours that the Kirin 8030 will debut if the chip is NOT the 8020. And remember, Kirin 8030 is likely to be the Kirin 9030 underclocked.
I guess, is time to introduce "Lite" phones (like the Mate or P series) with the 8020 processor? That thing is on par with Dimensity 8200 on Harmony OS and Dimensity 8020 with the EMUI.

And finally
There are 3 Huawei Mate models and the vanilla has a different model:
- Vanilla with Kirin 9020
- Pro with Kirin 9030
- Pro Plus with Kirin 9030
 
  • Like
Reactions: pavlecom

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,045
763
96
And well... the Flip S didn't come with Kirin 8030, but just with 8020
 

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,045
763
96
And well...
There are the SoC leaks of the Kirin 9030 on the Mate 80 Pro Max

View attachment 134459That made me say... How Google had to screw up very hard with the Tensor G5 to the point that a"7nm" Kirin 9030 matches them?

That might be a clear lesson on how to NOT to make bad desicions when making a processor.

And need to recognize how Huawei managed to pull something decent despite everything.

EDIT: NEW INFO!

Differences between Kirin 9030 and 9030 Pro seems that the latter has 2 more threads, but aparently is because 1 core is deactivated on the 9030.


1764176440139.jpeg
 
Last edited:

pavlecom

Junior Member
Dec 19, 2025
1
0
6
Highlights:

Nice AnTuTu score of Kirin 9030 Pro, 1,75 mil .. around iPhone 16 pro max 3nm! .. a bravura! ✔

More Info on Blog:
New Kirin 9030 Pro - AnTuTu Score | & Expertise |


[Appendix]

A Walky-Talky built in, works on a 2,4GHz in radius of 5 Km, and 700MHz radius 10 Km (can message too) .. so good feature!
Fully complete stay-connected phone: 5.5G, Sat, 2,4GHz, 700MHz, remarkable as is, like its world 1st 8000 nits brightness! 🏆
 
Last edited:

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,045
763
96
Take this as a grain of salt, but... there are videos showing estimations of the Kirin 9030 Pro

The core config goes like that. Aparently seeing how the scores went, seems that CPU uARCH are the same used for the Kirin 9020. But GPU is a new one with more cores.
1766372521438.png
Yeah, the graphics are just a stimate, but heck, going near Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 tier with that process, is doable.
1766372392714.png

Got improved by 11% ST and 23% Multi thread
1766372425417.png

Using 3DMark shows some stimations, it defeats the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and is near Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 tier. This is now a big deal. Since even if we cut 2 cores, it beats Kirin 9020 GPU.

1766372486644.png

Power comsumption wise shows that is on par with Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 at least CPU wise
1766372651953.png


GPU wise is still an issue, Huawei relies a LOT on optimization
1766372765578.png

This is the performance in Genshin, it already goes at near 60 FPS with less than 4W. Considering that Apple manages similar numbers but with 120 FPS shows how a need of stronger GPU is shown from Huawei.
1766372911518.png


Let's see if Geekerwan or western reviewers squeeze more of the processor.
 

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,045
763
96
This is interesting. Huawei is returning into the 1 million sales tier in less than a month.

For a high tier phone this is interesting to reach that ammount in short time.
 

soresu

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2014
4,240
3,742
136
This is interesting. Huawei is returning into the 1 million sales tier in less than a month.

For a high tier phone this is interesting to reach that ammount in short time.
Ehh.....

Impressive for a western brand or Samsung sure.

But that's still only about 0.1% of the potential domestic market which is Huawei's key demographic since US sanctions kneecapped their global reach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and DZero

soresu

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2014
4,240
3,742
136
It will be interesting to see what happens if their EUV claims actually prove real with non catastrophic yields, and what that might mean for them rejoining the global market.
 

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,045
763
96
Ehh.....

Impressive for a western brand or Samsung sure.

But that's still only about 0.1% of the potential domestic market which is Huawei's key demographic since US sanctions kneecapped their global reach.
Indeed, but considering that, is not bad, and remember, is pending to see how will fare globally.

It will be interesting to see what happens if their EUV claims actually prove real with non catastrophic yields, and what that might mean for them rejoining the global market.

Indeed, I kinda expect maintain the 5nm EUV with 65% yield rate, but the performance would be pretty much 10% better than the previous gen, but still, I expect a Tock from Huawei with the 5nm DUV, like a last song from them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and soresu

soresu

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2014
4,240
3,742
136
Indeed, but considering that, is not bad, and remember, is pending to see how will fare globally.
I am rooting for them.

Without them to keep Samsung and Apple somewhat modest the prices for hi end phones have just become insane.

I'm not going to fork out that much money for a new phone ever.

Maybe for a 3.5-4K per eye VR headset, or a full PC upgrade/rebuild (once DRAM prices lower enough to make that viable again).

But not for a phone - just nuh uh.

tbh I think it was probably Samsung, Qualcomm and Apple that lobbied the US govmt to put sanctions on Huawei and HiSilicon - they were competing too well and not charging the moon for it.
 

Doug S

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2020
3,791
6,717
136
I am rooting for them.

Without them to keep Samsung and Apple somewhat modest the prices for hi end phones have just become insane.

I don't follow Samsung but if you look at when Apple first introduced the base / Pro / Pro Max modern lineup in 2019 the prices have increased only $100 for each model in 2025. That's below total inflation from 2019 to 2025 (inflation calculator says $1 then is $1.27 now)
 

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,045
763
96
I don't follow Samsung but if you look at when Apple first introduced the base / Pro / Pro Max modern lineup in 2019 the prices have increased only $100 for each model in 2025. That's below total inflation from 2019 to 2025 (inflation calculator says $1 then is $1.27 now)
Isn't that too much inflation in that short time? That's how the dollar inflated in 10 years from 2000 to 2010!
 

Doug S

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2020
3,791
6,717
136
COVID and the ensuing supply chain disruption kicked off a lot of inflation.

And most of the world saw even worse inflation during that period, it for sure wasn't a US only phenomena. I don't know how much Apple's pricing has changed in terms of other currencies like euro or yuan, or how other major phone OEMs like Samsung have adjusted their pricing over that time.

Between SoCs getting more expensive over time as TSMC per wafer prices increase, smartphones using more NAND/DRAM in base configs, the addition of more/better cameras, and so forth there have been a lot of technological improvements over that period fighting against the tech world's constant price deflation (for identical specs) we've enjoyed thanks to Moore's Law for decades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,045
763
96
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
23,161
13,254
136
Rememner that the thread is NOT only about mobile phones...


Now Huawei is entering on the SBC market.
Hmm where are they sourcing so much DRAM for their SBCs?
 

DZero

Platinum Member
Jun 20, 2024
2,045
763
96
Hmm where are they sourcing so much DRAM for their SBCs?
China has their own RAM fabs. RAM does not need cutting edge tech to be made, it can be made even with 14nm in the DDR4 and DDR5 (low tier in this case) variants.


They were fabbing DDR4 and move to DDR5, but with this issue, I don't be surprised if the government said to maintain the production and also focus on DDR5.