• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

hey...I think this is an open invitation

the best ones are around .8 to 2.0
Below .4 are bad and above 4.0 is just as bad really. If you look at the map, the higher ones are at the other end of the scale.

At least thats been the case with me.

.4 _down avg 4.5-5 hours
.8-2.0 avg 3.7-3.9 hours
4.0_up avg 4.5-5 hours

Force
 
GunDog - theoretically, those VHAR WUs (like the ones you show as 4+) have very little analysis done on them and all *should* be faster than the 0.4s etc., so not sure why yours are running slower... 🙁
 
Yes the angle range reflects the degree's north or south of 20 degree's on the sky map. The low angle ones are closest to 20 degee's so they are in the middle of the sky map.

In my past experience anything below 0.100 is really crappy, and anything above 1.200 is sky candy.😎
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top