Hey Engineer.................

[Dantoo]

Please slip down into engineering and see if warp core has shut down? Be careful - basement might be full of dastardly drones. They seem to be up to their old tricks again 😀

 

[Engineer]

😀

Checking on it...will update when I find out! 🙂

more...more...more! :Q

 

[InlineFive]

If you read the front page you will find out that the forums are running on a brand new Quad-Opteron server with 8GB of memory (dynamic web cache) and 150GB of drives in RAID-10. Thus the downtime.

-Por

 

[LANMAN]

Originally posted by: PorBleemo
If you read the front page you will find out that the forums are running on a brand new Quad-Opteron server with 8GB of memory (dynamic web cache) and 150GB of drives in RAID-10. Thus the downtime.

-Por

I'd still pay the membership fee's for faster access. This morning has sure been pokey. 🙁

However, that's a nice setup there! I hope to see some improvements as we burn in the first 24 hours! 😀

Its running a DC project of some kind, right? [sneeze] SETI [/sneeze]

--LANMAN

 

[Engineer]

Originally posted by: PorBleemo
If you read the front page you will find out that the forums are running on a brand new Quad-Opteron server with 8GB of memory (dynamic web cache) and 150GB of drives in RAID-10. Thus the downtime.

-Por

Nothing to do with the forums....unless CADKindaGUY is running the Federation's SETIQueue on the forum server! 😉

😀

😛

:Q

Nice server though! 🙂

 

[amdxborg]

Originally posted by: PorBleemo
If you read the front page you will find out that the forums are running on a brand new Quad-Opteron server with 8GB of memory (dynamic web cache) and 150GB of drives in RAID-10. Thus the downtime.

-Por

WoW...no that's the kinda cruncher I want!!! 😀

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Dantoo
Please slip down into engineering and see if warp core has shut down? Be careful - basement might be full of dastardly drones. They seem to be up to their old tricks again 😀

Sorry😱 The same C++ runtime error I was getting a while back is starting again. SetiQ is definately the problem so I'm probably going to uninstall it and reinstall it....unless people who use it don't want to loose their stat history.

Might get to that "project" next weekend at the earliest. Let me know it the Queue goes down again- thanks.

CkG

 

[Dantoo]

Warp is back online


😀

 

[Engineer]

Originally posted by: Dantoo
Warp is back online


😀

😀

CAD...I don't mind at all. I have a queue at home and at work...so I can look at both. But without your queue, my queue at work just builds up and it's sneakernet time.....which would really be a pain right now with my work load! :Q

Thanks for keeping the queue up! 🙂

 

[n0cmonkey]

How intesive, bandwidth and hardware wise is a SetiQ?

 

[Engineer]

Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
How intesive, bandwidth and hardware wise is a SetiQ?

Well, it's not that intensive hardware wise unless you have a huge number of clients. Each WU downloaded is between 300k and 400k in size. So if you have several thousand WU's going through per day, you'll get Several hundreds of Megabytes of downloads per day.
The bandwidth seems to be more of a problem than the hardware. Might need several gigs on the HD to store logs, WU's, etc. Completed WU's are just several K in size.


Edit: Remember, you'll be downloading all of those WU's and then sending them back out (at some point) to another PC. If this is all done on the internet (not internal Queue), then you'll have double the bandwidth as you'll be downloading each WU and sending out those same WU's.

 

[n0cmonkey]

Originally posted by: Engineer

Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
How intesive, bandwidth and hardware wise is a SetiQ?

Well, it's not that intensive hardware wise unless you have a huge number of clients. Each WU downloaded is between 300k and 400k in size. So if you have several thousand WU's going through per day, you'll get Several hundreds of Megabytes of downloads per day.
The bandwidth seems to be more of a problem than the hardware. Might need several gigs on the HD to store logs, WU's, etc. Completed WU's are just several K in size.


Edit: Remember, you'll be downloading all of those WU's and then sending them back out (at some point) to another PC. If this is all done on the internet (not internal Queue), then you'll have double the bandwidth as you'll be downloading each WU and sending out those same WU's.

So basically a prety beefy network connection, depending on the number of clients... Cool, thanks.

 

[Unforgiven]

i run a seti queue at home on a dsl line of 640 down/272 up and it works fine for my 15 users for my small seti team.

 

[n0cmonkey]

Originally posted by: Unforgiven
i run a seti queue at home on a dsl line of 640 down/272 up and it works fine for my 15 users for my small seti team.

Is there a way to limit the number of users or do you just have to ask nicely? 😛

I guess I'll go find docs on this... (I don't really run seti often, but I'm looking for a project or two..)

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Dantoo
Please slip down into engineering and see if warp core has shut down? Be careful - basement might be full of dastardly drones. They seem to be up to their old tricks again 😀

Seems there was another short outage this morning. The wonderful electric company

decided they needed to cut our section's power again without notifying us. How nice - no?

All is well once again and the Queue should be up and running.

CkG