My point really is that "natural laws" are human abstractions of the universe's behavior. They are not writ into the fabric of reality, and in fact they may be "violated" when we observe some new behavior which is not in accordance with our current models. The double-slit experiment, for example, "violated" Newtonian physical laws, and spurred the formulation of quantum mechanics. This didn't exactly invalidate Newtonian physics, but rather showed us the limits of its descriptiveness.
The universe doesn't obey laws, per se. It behaves with certain regularities which we abstract to form generalized statements to describe those regularities.
This very much depends on how you view it, IF you want to go into the finer parts of QP then i really can't help you more than saying that reality as we percieve it might not be real at all, at this point all of science fails because if true, all observable evidence is false all measurable evidence is false too.
In the reality we exist in, we cannot break these natural laws, we really really cannot, not with physical, biological nor chemical tests, so this QP experiment doesn't really apply to anything more than that there are other dimensions, which is obvious anyway.
The universe is indeed restricted by laws, we may not know exactly how these laws can work when bending them through expansion but that doesn't mean they are not in place, they most certainly are, if they were not, none of this would work, nothing of the universe would be as it is today if those restrictions were not in place.
I think you need to study some Krauss to get a hold of what you are talking about.
Facebook
Twitter