shortylickens
No Lifer
- Jul 15, 2003
- 80,287
- 17,082
- 136
And again I have to say this: According to the law its not self defense if you instigate the violence. And once again the guy will probably get off because juries are made up of morons.
And again I have to say this: According to the law its not self defense if you instigate the violence. And once again the guy will probably get off because juries are made up of morons.
What gun law would you propose that would have prevented this from happening?
Holy shit the most insane thing about that video is just how little reaction there is to a dude just getting killed. These people are fucking insane.
I would be surprised if the shooter didn't walk, though. Texas. Guns. "Self defense."
Two aggressive dudes, one at the home of the other, victim reaches for shooter's gun, shooter kills him. Ezpz self defense. This is the country we live in.
He has the legal standing to defend his property from the aggressor with lethal force (I believe, in Texas) and despite presenting with a weapon, the victim took a more aggressive posture and then touched the gun. As I said earlier, I'd be shocked if this isn't self-defense easily.
What Property needed Defending?
I wonder with the increased prevalence of events like this being video'd whether that will have a generally humanizing or dehumanizing effect on the American public's perspectives on gun violence. I'm amazed at the idea that anyone could watch that video and think "good shoot", but I've been in enough 2A discussions to be confident of its inevitability.
For example, in a sane world I'd expect if a decent video was taken of a school shooting in all its horror and pointlessness that the American public would take overwhelmingly to the streets to demand a change in gun laws, but I can't help but think that the general reaction would be <shrug>.
He has the legal standing to defend his property from the aggressor with lethal force (I believe, in Texas) and despite presenting with a weapon, the victim took a more aggressive posture and then touched the gun. As I said earlier, I'd be shocked if this isn't self-defense easily.
I don't disagree with you, but I wonder what would happen if let's say the victim had instead wrestled the gun away and killed the owner with it, then claimed self defense?
Like I said in the other thread, self defense goes to whoever is left standing, it seems.
We had 20+ kids killed at Sandy Hook and nobody batted an eye.
I'm curious what others think, too. We have some forum residents from Texas who I would think know the law down there like the back of their hand when it comes to these situations. It doesn't matter whether they were D or R or what the Fox position is Was that warning shot next to his feet legal? In response if deceased Dad had a his own pcc and put two in him first would he have been within his rights to defend himself? Why is this a thing to begin with.
What happened to fist fighting, not kicking a downed opponent in the head, and actually helping the other guy up, shaking hands and maybe even going out to have a beer? This fucking place not to mention the callousness of filming a death and not being aware or caring anyone is actually dead or rendering aid.
Just like Rittenhouse, no empathy or remorse.The casualness afterwards is what got me.
We had 20+ kids killed at Sandy Hook and nobody batted an eye.
We had 20+ kids killed at Sandy Hook and nobody batted an eye.
Maybe not a "gun law" per se, but I agree with the concept. Using lethal force should be a last resort, not the go to standard. I think it will be difficult to ever get rid of guns themselves, but certainly making a more reasonable standard for their use in "self defense" would go a long way to eliminating needless killings.Duty to retreat maybe.
Well, Rittenhouse instigated the violence in Kenosha by walking around in a volatile situation openly carrying an AR-15, but he got away with it and is now a hero of the Right.And again I have to say this: According to the law its not self defense if you instigate the violence. And once again the guy will probably get off because juries are made up of morons.
Yea, dont want to derail this back to a KR thread, but that is what is so unforgiveable to me about KR. I could accept (somewhat) that he was overly enthusiastic and got in over his head if he showed some remorse.Just like Rittenhouse, no empathy or remorse.
