• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Here it comes - D9E

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Makes me wonder why they are jumping to a 512bit memory bus when not even the 384bit bus on the G80GTX gave much benefit over the standard 256bit bus.
 
8800gt seems to really fall off at 1920x1200 with AA/AF and esp at 2560x1600. They have to have something for the 24/30 + size monitors. I even read a DT article the other day about 3840x???? resolution on a 22.2 " monitor!! That would probably require an even larger bus than 512.
 
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
8800gt seems to really fall off at 1920x1200 with AA/AF and esp at 2560x1600. They have to have something for the 24/30 + size monitors. I even read a DT article the other day about 3840x???? resolution on a 22.2 " monitor!! That would probably require an even larger bus than 512.
Click to expand...
8800 GT's main flaw is that it has too small framebuffer: 512MB..that's why 8800 GTS 640MB closes the gap when those freaky settings are used. I think that 8800 GT is first (consumer class) card that would get real advantage from 1024MB over 512MB version. Not to mention upcoming 8800 GTS..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top