• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Here comes another one: Enemy Expatriation Act

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
The category “support hostilities against the United States.” applies to every single criminal in the United States. It's a broad, generic, and all encompassing removal of human rights.

Fuck, it merely says 'support'. You don't have to be the one doing it, just a person associated with them in any way.

Again, do you even bother to read:

an expatriating act must be committed with the intent of relinquishing citizenship status for loss of citizenship to occur.

Please inform us how the acts of "every single criminal" in the U.S. are committed with "the intent of relinquishing citizenship status?"
 
Trials not required in America. I'm sure President Obama will sign this one too with great reservation. 😛

Reading is your friend:

An individual may also challenge that holding in federal district court. The burden of proof, by a preponderance of evidence, would be on the party asserting that loss of citizenship has occurred.
 
Do you guys even bother to read?

and

Let's see, 1986. That would have under Ronald Reagan.

So tell me again how this change is a huge threat to American citizens?


I support this bill. I also see nothing that's a threat to American citizens who aren't actively waging a war against the US.
 
It sounds like something that will be used later in the inevitable descent into fascism that the US will go through.
 
Back
Top