Helping conservatives with self inderstanding.

[xj0hnx]

I objectively partisan.

Science is just applied liberal thinking in my opinion

I don't think you know what the words you are using mean.

How do you know the science is wrong. Could it be just an uninformed opinion baste on some unconscious need?

If you are touting it, it is wrong.

 

[Texashiker]

Deep down you assume that what motivates you motivates everybody else, and you do so without the slightest idea as to what your motivations are.

What motivates me is to live in peace and quiet.

You did not address the points I brought up. Which is a typical liberal.

You think the glbt community is liberal? Ask them about plural marriages and see what they say.

 

[cubby1223]

http://www.dailytech.com/Study+Inte...rototypical+Everyday+Sadists/article36091.htm

 

[Victorian Gray]

What motivates me is to live in peace and quiet.

You did not address the points I brought up. Which is a typical liberal.

You think the glbt community is liberal? Ask them about plural marriages and see what they say.

Here ya go. Register and ask a few folks how they feel.

http://www.gaypolygamist.com/

Who knows...

 

[Moonbeam]

http://www.dailytech.com/Study+Inte...rototypical+Everyday+Sadists/article36091.htm

Yes, my link, I think, does a good job of explaining how you feel. You are a conservative and live in a dangerously competative, non altruistic world full of self serving people which explains why you so often feel you are victims. These well documented facts are at root in your need to rationalize to protect your egos, the egos of conservatives, who feel bad about themselves when their motives are exposed. You cover your eyes and ears and hurl insults.

Your article on people who self report as enjoying being trolls was interesting. You may have seen something in it of yourself to explain why. I never call people trolls. I do not understand the concept. I can't define what one is. But I am accused of that by people I see as I empathetic bullies all the time. I see it as a form of self hate, calling the other guy what you most dislike about yourself.

Know then that I would not be among those who self report as enjoying trolling so your study is not about me. I think it more likely to be your need not to know that altruistic egoless people who consider others do not really exist, that they are tricksters and manipulative.

Believe me, as a student of buttons and mechanical thinking, nothing is easier for me than knowing how to play you. It't your transparency perhaps that gets you upset. Sadly, there is little hope for you without a mirror on which to see yourself, and the looking will hurt. But the knowledge and peace that can result is worth it so I must help you see that. I don't need to but I will continue to see if I can find a way to troll for your soul. Buried under the garbage of your ego is a liberal in an infant state. So since trolls like me have adaptive advantage and are successful breeders, maybe you will consider that infant liberal to be my son.

 

[Moonbeam]

I don't think you know what the words you are using mean.



If you are touting it, it is wrong.

I predicted that Conservatives would not respond or try to see anything about themselves via my link but would simply attack me. So let's just say that when it comes to understanding science in words and touting those positions, I'm a fucking genius.

 

[brandonb]

I read the entire article.

What's your point Moonbeam? Conservatives do perceive the world differently than liberals. We don't need an article to point that out. I look at you as a threat... You look at me as a threat. You will say "But its your conservative brain defect that makes you a threat to me." I look at you and say "If idiots like this gain true power, the world will be on a very bad place. That is threatening to me."

So the end result is what? Trying to justify your own fear and give an excuse to think the way you do?

 

[1prophet]

Does anyone else see articles like these as creepy forms of political eugenics? It's almost as if there's increasing social pressure disadvantageously to shutdown/kill half of your brain. As though there's even such a thing as a pure liberal or conservative... absolutely bizarre.

They were doing the same thing back in the day using the infallibility of science to show how black people, irish, etc, were inferior.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_racism

And if you study this scientific racism you will realize it was those who were considered intellectually superior and prominent in high stations of society during their time, promoting this nonsense, yet it was accepted because of their intellectual and social stature.

 

[cubby1223]

I predicted that Conservatives would not respond or try to see anything about themselves via my link but would simply attack me. So let's just say that when it comes to understanding science in words and touting those positions, I'm a fucking genius.

I'll post it again because you didn't understand it the first time:
http://www.dailytech.com/Study+Inte...rototypical+Everyday+Sadists/article36091.htm

Narcissism? To quote you, "I'm a fucking genius."
Psychopathy? You sure don't have empathy deeming those you disagree with brain damaged; no remorse at all, no disinhibition in your bold threads.
Machiavellianism? You write these posts and these responses with absolutely no hint of emotion inside you. You are a stone-cold poster.

 

[Texashiker]

Here ya go. Register and ask a few folks how they feel.

Who knows...

I said the majority, not the minority.

 

[Texashiker]

You will say "But its your conservative brain defect that makes you a threat to me." I look at you and say "If idiots like this gain true power, the world will be on a very bad place. That is threatening to me."

Part of the problem between conservatives and liberals is a lack of mutual respect.

Moonbeam with this brain-defect stuff is a threat to that mutual respect.

 

[Greenman]

I predicted that Conservatives would not respond or try to see anything about themselves via my link but would simply attack me. So let's just say that when it comes to understanding science in words and touting those positions, I'm a fucking genius.

While you may think that, to many of us you come across as not too bright. My guess is that's just how you chose to troll, and not an indicator of you're actual IQ.
Just about everything you post is based on one of two themes, and it's generally not very coherent. Your "republicans are brain damaged" theme is nothing more than the exact same bigotry that you accuse them of harboring. The "you hate yourself" theme might actually have some small thread of truth in it, but you present the concept so poorly it becomes laughable. The bottom line is your entire goal here is to insult and demean those that don't agree with your agenda, the problem is that you're not very good at it.

 

[MongGrel]

While you may think that, to many of us you come across as not too bright. My guess is that's just how you chose to troll, and not an indicator of you're actual IQ.
Just about everything you post is based on one of two themes, and it's generally not very coherent. Your "republicans are brain damaged" theme is nothing more than the exact same bigotry that you accuse them of harboring. The "you hate yourself" theme might actually have some small thread of truth in it, but you present the concept so poorly it becomes laughable. The bottom line is your entire goal here is to insult and demean those that don't agree with your agenda, the problem is that you're not very good at it.

Perhaps you have a comprehension problem.

 

[Greenman]

Perhaps you have a comprehension problem.

That could very well be true. Certainly a point I wouldn't argue.

 

[D-Man]

Moonie the only answer I can give to your continued attack on Conservative's is this

"I yam what I yam and tha's all what I yam." -- Popeye the Sailor

 

[mizzou]

Liberal: If you go to wikipedia and look up liberal, the definition is to be without bigotry, political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual.

The problem is, liberals are hypocrites.

Lets take the glbt and marriage equality movement as an example. How often does the glbt community mention Polygamy or Polyandry? Chances are rarely if ever.

Most people from the glbt community say marriage is between two people.

That makes the majority of the glbt hypocrites as they oppose being married to more than one person. As long as "they" can marry who they want, that is all they care about. When someone outside their accepted ideology wants to get married, the glbt community is opposed to it.

Conservative: Wikipedia defines Conservative as a political and social philosophy promotes retaining traditional social institutions.

When a group of people such as the glbt community win equal rights, they will then be conservatives as they will oppose polygamy, polyandry and prostitution.

When the glbt community achieves their desired change, they will oppose further change, which will make them conservatives.

Both the political liberal / conservatives are themselves conservative and liberal on several different areas.

We should never labeled them as either/or as in the end, if we say they are conservative yet are extremely liberal on gun policy...it's hypocritical to the core!

 

[Moonbeam]

I read the entire article.

What's your point Moonbeam? Conservatives do perceive the world differently than liberals. We don't need an article to point that out. I look at you as a threat... You look at me as a threat. You will say "But its your conservative brain defect that makes you a threat to me." I look at you and say "If idiots like this gain true power, the world will be on a very bad place. That is threatening to me."

So the end result is what? Trying to justify your own fear and give an excuse to think the way you do?

You say you read the link but if you did you didn't take in what was said. Liberals and. Observations es hunk differently and you want to say w honk he same, that liberals fear conservative and conservatives fear liberal, that the have that in common, built that is precisely how conservatives think. They always make this false equivalency. Conservatives fear liberals more than liberals fear conservatives and that is a major point you don't want to be conscious of because you have been conditioned to regard fear as a weakness. It reflects badly on your ego and that causes conservativess to abandon logic and rationalize. Liberals do this less, are more able to face facts that impugn their egos because they are able to repress fear I. Favor of logic.

In short when conservatives are faced with scientific evidence of their condition, they start to babble nonsense.

 

[Londo_Jowo]

Both the political liberal / conservatives are themselves conservative and liberal on several different areas.

We should never labeled them as either/or as in the end, if we say they are conservative yet are extremely liberal on gun policy...it's hypocritical to the core!

Bingo!!!! This is why studies such as this are irrelevant.

 

[Moonbeam]

Moonie the only answer I can give to your continued attack on Conservative's is this

"I yam what I yam and tha's all what I yam." -- Popeye the Sailor

Of course, but that is your prison. Believing and acting out rationalizations, living in a bubble, voting in one, is failing to act responsibly, a trait conservative don't practice, but rave about when they see that side of themselves in others. Self awareness is a perquisite of wisdom.

 

[Moonbeam]

Both the political liberal / conservatives are themselves conservative and liberal on several different areas.

We should never labeled them as either/or as in the end, if we say they are conservative yet are extremely liberal on gun policy...it's hypocritical to the core!

Individuals fall on a spectrum, but that is irrelevant here. The brain scans that show differences between liberals and conservatives were done not on someone's opinion of their persuasion, but by self reporting. People who say they are conservative have different brains than folk who say they are liberal.

 

[Moonbeam]

I'll post it again because you didn't understand it the first time:
http://www.dailytech.com/Study+Inte...rototypical+Everyday+Sadists/article36091.htm

Narcissism? To quote you, "I'm a fucking genius."
Psychopathy? You sure don't have empathy deeming those you disagree with brain damaged; no remorse at all, no disinhibition in your bold threads.
Machiavellianism? You write these posts and these responses with absolutely no hint of emotion inside you. You are a stone-cold poster.

Why do you repost a study of folk who call themselves trolls and apply it to me who has zero interest in that entire theme? Don't you see you seem want to ram these notions of yours down my throat. It seems a bit sadistic and cold. Do you think that what bothers you is that I threaten your ego.

 

[Moonbeam]

That could very well be true. Certainly a point I wouldn't argue.

Imagine one person who has done a great deal of psychoanalysis, has dealt with some of his unconscious feelings and somebody who hasn't. The second person will be at a loss over some of the things the first says. No matter how intelligent a person may be their knowledge of things is limited by their experience. You can't put an old head on young shoulders, etc. I remember well the first time I noticed some kids younger than me talking about something and I realized they had no idea what they were talking about. There is no fault in this unless the ego takes offense.

 

[norseamd]

Liberal: If you go to wikipedia and look up liberal, the definition is to be without bigotry, political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual.

The problem is, liberals are hypocrites.

Lets take the glbt and marriage equality movement as an example. How often does the glbt community mention Polygamy or Polyandry? Chances are rarely if ever.

Most people from the glbt community say marriage is between two people.

That makes the majority of the glbt hypocrites as they oppose being married to more than one person. As long as "they" can marry who they want, that is all they care about. When someone outside their accepted ideology wants to get married, the glbt community is opposed to it.

Conservative: Wikipedia defines Conservative as a political and social philosophy promotes retaining traditional social institutions.

When a group of people such as the glbt community win equal rights, they will then be conservatives as they will oppose polygamy, polyandry and prostitution.

When the glbt community achieves their desired change, they will oppose further change, which will make them conservatives.

true

 

[norseamd]

As far as my views go I'm probably closer to this than anything.

Blue Dog Coalition



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Dog_Coalition

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_way

 

[mizzou]

Individuals fall on a spectrum, but that is irrelevant here. The brain scans that show differences between liberals and conservatives were done not on someone's opinion of their persuasion, but by self reporting. People who say they are conservative have different brains than folk who say they are liberal.

when you say conservative, do you mean to say "follows the ideals of the Republican Party"