Help!

zefyx1

Junior Member
Apr 5, 2009
2
0
0
My stats as follows:

Q6600 G0
IP35 Pro
4GB Patriot 800MHz DDR2

Trying to get this Q6600 prime95 stable at 3.6GHz, shortly after doing a prime test for all 4 cores I get a reboot.

My bios settings are as follows:
400x9
1:1.00 (DDR2-800)
PCI-E: 100MHz

CPU Core: 1.5050v
DDR2: 2.200 (Recommended voltage)
CPU VTT: 1.27
MCH 1.25v: 1.41
ICH 1.05v: 1.15v
ICHIO 1.5v: 1.70v
DDR2 Reference: 0%
CPU GTLREF 0&2: 67%
CPU GTLREF 1&3: 67%

Any ideas? My temps are fine, my vDroop is pretty bad, but as it stands with vDroop I'm still below 1.50v under load. Thanks for the help!
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
You may just not be able to run at that speed. Try 8x400 and see if you can prime overnight. At 3.2 you should be able to run at 1.35V.
 

palladium

Senior member
Dec 24, 2007
539
2
81
I agree with Rubycon, if you can't get 3.6 stable with 1.5V you probably should back off ( unless you have water cooling). You may want to try and squeeze an additional 100-200MHz without further increasing the Vcore, though.
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Originally posted by: zefyx
I've already gotten 3.2GHz stable, that's why I'm shooting for 3.6GHz!

Try running at 378x9 with 1.4 volts and priming over night.

What voltage are you stable at 3.2?

A Q6600 at 3.2 is no slouch either. ;)

Not all Q6600's can do 3.6. It may be the holy grail for this CPU in fact. Probably less than 15% of them will do this stable loaded with decent air cooling.

You can also increase your VTT higher but stay below 1.45.
 

chizow

Diamond Member
Jun 26, 2001
9,537
2
0
It could be your board, I'd say the 1.5V BIOS setting would be good indication of that. Newer boards with Load Line Calibration help a lot in delivering more stable and accurate voltages. I've also read P35 isn't nearly as stable as P45/X48 with Quad overclocking at high FSB speeds (400MHz+) due to FSB termination voltages. These two improvements going from an Nvidia 650i board to an Asus P45 seemed to have the greatest impact on my Q6600's overclocking stability. I couldn't get 3.1GHz stable on the 650i, but was able to hit 3.6GHz with the P45 with the exact same chip.
 

Ratman6161

Senior member
Mar 21, 2008
616
75
91
Originally posted by: Rubycon
Originally posted by: zefyx
I've already gotten 3.2GHz stable, that's why I'm shooting for 3.6GHz!

Try running at 378x9 with 1.4 volts and priming over night.

What voltage are you stable at 3.2?

A Q6600 at 3.2 is no slouch either. ;)

Not all Q6600's can do 3.6. It may be the holy grail for this CPU in fact. Probably less than 15% of them will do this stable loaded with decent air cooling.

You can also increase your VTT higher but stay below 1.45.

378x9 is a good suggestion. My q6600/IP35E does not like 400Mhz FSB. For example it is 100% stable at my usual 356x9 but not at 400x8 even though both yield about the same 3.2 GHz. 378x9 works for me but I have to crank up the voltage whereas with 356x9 I can leave it at default. I also don't really notice the extra couple of hundred Mhz for my usage so it didn't make any sense.
 

Smartazz

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2005
6,128
0
76
Originally posted by: lavaheadache
this thread makes my q6600 seem godlike. 3.6ghz is a breeze with only 1.32volts

That's pretty sick, what was the original VID of the chip?
 

spinejam

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
3,503
1
81
those abit ip35's have a significant vdrop and vdroop. an earlier q6600 i had needed a vcore of 1.55 (bios) to run at 3.5ghz prime stable. that cpu would register a vcore of 1.44 @ load (cpuz). :Q

try upping the vcore a bit! :)
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,587
10,225
126
Originally posted by: lavaheadache
this thread makes my q6600 seem godlike. 3.6ghz is a breeze with only 1.32volts

Mine too. DFI X48 LP LT T2R, with LLC enabled.

Temps are still an issue, with a Tuniq. Not great, but the chip will survive. (80-90C linpack)