Help! Video Camcorder information.

jamesave

Golden Member
Aug 27, 2000
1,610
0
76
Can anybody give a comment on the difference between Sony, panasonic and canon products in Mini dv camcorder? Such as the night vision capability, still pictures (when video is being recorded?)

TIA
 

bunker

Lifer
Apr 23, 2001
10,572
0
71
Do not rely on a camcorder for still images. That is all.

I have a panasonic and it's been very good to me. It was pretty much the bottom of the line for them when I bought it.
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
all three are good, dont rely on them for stills ~1.0mp max. Sony has the better nightshot, but i believe canon offers more optical zoom. Dont pay attention to the ~700x digital zoom.
 

jamesave

Golden Member
Aug 27, 2000
1,610
0
76
I need a camcorder that can be upgraded with accessories, such as the light... it seems like sony has been the better one (from the linked site)

I think I will go with Sony.
 

Ornery

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,022
17
81
I'd jump up to the 3.5" LCD. Try shooting with the 2.5" screen, then use the 3.5" one. It's worth the bump up, IMO. TRV-27
 

Muadib

Lifer
May 30, 2000
18,124
912
126
Originally posted by: jamesave
OK.. I have come up with two final selection:

TRV-19 or TRV-22
Both are Sony, $599 and $799, repectively.

http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_Compare-Paging;sid=n46ZeXqd8BOZckRQH3OTcjWRASv1zFJ07j4=

is the comparison- I don't really care about digital still. then, does $200 justigy the video difference? 690K Pixels vs 340K Pixels?

Your link doesn't work, but yes there is quite a difference quality wise between 690k and 340k. Well worth the extra $200 IMO. Sears carries Sony, and I'm pretty sure they still will pricematch off the net. A friend of mine got the TRV-27 that Ornery has linked, for under $500 there.