Help: Upgrading from FM1 A6-3500 APU

JinRoh3

Junior Member
Jun 18, 2014
1
0
0
Hello! I currently have a computer running an AMD A6-3500 APU with an ASUS F1A75-M LE motherboard.

I've been thinking about upgrading it to be able to comfortably run "some" modern games (not needed at HIGH ULTRA detail) along with (and most often) some low-demanding mini games.

We've been having trouble with Child of Light (it doesn't even run)

My options as of today:

1 - Buy a graphics card ( R7 250x or 260x -> 90€ vs 97€). My fear is that the processor would hold the graphics back...

2 - Upgrade MOBO + Processor (since it's a FM1, would need FM2(+).

Which Processor would you recommend? A modern, powerful APU?

Let's say I could spend 100-200€ top. In which case would I find more differences in general and gaming performance

Aside from this, the computer also has:

Recently purchased:

A new case
Corsair CX430 v2

Moved from another computer:
Crucial 120GB SSD
2x4GB RAM from Kingston
 

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
What is your current video card? Or are you using the iGPU?
 

Insert_Nickname

Diamond Member
May 6, 2012
4,971
1,695
136
If you're using the IGP definitely add a graphics card. I don't think the A6-3500 will hold something like a 260(X) or GTX750TI back too much. Either properly has 3-4x the performance of the IGP.

You could also try and find a 3670K or 3870K used for extra CPU performance, but again I don't think it'll matter too much.
 

Essence_of_War

Platinum Member
Feb 21, 2013
2,650
4
81
If you're using the IGP definitely add a graphics card. I don't think the A6-3500 will hold something like a 260(X) or GTX750TI back too much.

I agree with this. You should be able to pick up either of those GPUs within your budget of 100-200 euro. The 750(Ti) offers nearly unmatched perf/watt right now, but depending on your budget, but you may be able to squeeze a little better perf/dollar out of an AMD card in the R7-260X->270X range, depending on your local prices.
 

Torn Mind

Lifer
Nov 25, 2012
12,004
2,748
136
Integrated graphics are not at the point where they are more powerful than current $100 discrete cards. Hell, even a 7750 would run circles around any Llano APU graphics, especially the chips below the A8s.

Even the current A10-7850K is slower than an R7 250. (Fewer stream processors, texture units, etc)
 

mistersprinkles

Senior member
May 24, 2014
211
0
0
You can track down used X58 stuff for pennies on the dollar on ebay. I saw someone selling an ASUS X58D-E with an i7 950 in it for $60 the other day. That would leave you $140 for a GPU. (enough for a 750Ti) and you'd have decent performance.
 

mfenn

Elite Member
Jan 17, 2010
22,400
5
71
www.mfenn.com
I agree with this. You should be able to pick up either of those GPUs within your budget of 100-200 euro. The 750(Ti) offers nearly unmatched perf/watt right now, but depending on your budget, but you may be able to squeeze a little better perf/dollar out of an AMD card in the R7-260X->270X range, depending on your local prices.

Thirded. The A6-3500 is a 2.1 GHz base clock tri-core. That isn't the fastest thing in the world (not by a long shot), but it is still roughly equivalent to an Athlon II X4 405e.

OP, let us know where you shop and we can make some specific recommendations.
 
Last edited:

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
Thirded. The A6-3500 is a 2.1 GHz base clock quad core. That isn't the fasted thing in the world (not by a long shot), but it is still roughly equivalent to an Athlon II X4 620.

OP, let us know where you shop and we can make some specific recommendations.
Minor correction: that's a tri-core, not a quad core. And 2.1GHz for a Stars core processor is pretty slow. Keep in mind that it's IPC is lower than Core 2, so we're talking about the single-threaded performance rivaling of some of the slowest C2Ds. Being a tri-core rather than a dual core is beneficial here, but it's still very liable to be a CPU bottleneck in just about anything.
 

Insert_Nickname

Diamond Member
May 6, 2012
4,971
1,695
136
Minor correction: that's a tri-core, not a quad core. And 2.1GHz for a Stars core processor is pretty slow. Keep in mind that it's IPC is lower than Core 2, so we're talking about the single-threaded performance rivaling of some of the slowest C2Ds. Being a tri-core rather than a dual core is beneficial here, but it's still very liable to be a CPU bottleneck in just about anything.

I saw some trials pairing an Athlon 5350 with a GTX750TI, CPU bottlenecking didn't look that bad at all. The Jaguar core is roughly comparable in IPC to the older K8 core. K10.5 should have a bit better IPC, and a small clockspeed advantage, the A6-3500 does turbo to 2.4GHz after all. It'll still lack that last core though. But overall a 260(X) or GTX750TI is going to completely annihilate the 320 shader VLIW5 IGP...
 

mfenn

Elite Member
Jan 17, 2010
22,400
5
71
www.mfenn.com
Minor correction: that's a tri-core, not a quad core. And 2.1GHz for a Stars core processor is pretty slow. Keep in mind that it's IPC is lower than Core 2, so we're talking about the single-threaded performance rivaling of some of the slowest C2Ds. Being a tri-core rather than a dual core is beneficial here, but it's still very liable to be a CPU bottleneck in just about anything.

Fixed, thanks. The CPU is definitely slow like I mentioned. The IGP is roughly equivalent to a "6550" (not that they actually made such a thing), which would be between a 6450 and 6570 in performance.

He really needs to upgrade both, but but I'm not sure that his budget allows a worthwhile upgrade of both parts (feedback on web shops pending). In this situation, when forced to choose between CPU/mobo and GPU, I'd upgrade the GPU.