Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Do any of you people realize that Saved by the Bell started in 1989-1993 and the guy is only 29 right now? That would mean he was 12 when the show started.
His parents would have overseen his finances. He's not totally to blame for this. Also the fact that it probably didn't generate that much money to begin with.
How long do you think that money last? That was 13 years ago. Give the guy a break.
And he was on various forms of Saved by the Bell for at least a decade. I'm quite certain that his parents weren't still nursing him when he was into the third or fourth season of Saved by the Bell.
Sorry my math was way off. 1989 was the start of Saved by the bell. He was born in 1977, which would have made him TWELVE years old.
Last season he did was 1994 (which was only actually 1 episode, the rest were in 1993)
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0224616/
He did one other show called "Saved by the Bell: Wedding in Las Vegas "
So we was all of what, 16-17 years old when Saved by the Bell ended?
Ok, so you think he should have had a financial advisor at the age of 12-17? Was it really HIS responsibility - or his parents?
This guy really isn't at fault. He wasn't even of age when the show ended and the money quit coming in. Now he's a 29 yr old washed up actor and just trying to make some money.
Originally posted by: CTrain
Originally posted by: ThaGrandCow
Dustin Diamond should be happy all he's losing is his house. The original Red Power Ranger, Austin St. <forget last name>, is in gay porn now, as a reciever. His porn name is Brock if I remember the thread, it was a few months ago.
Ok its just really scary that you know anything about gay porn.
Originally posted by: BooGiMaN
from all i have heard and seen when he does interviews it seems he has a chip on his shoulder...
last i heard he was doing stand up comedy, i take it he sucks as a comedien...he must have not gotten along with the other peopl on the show i dont see anyone rallyign around to help him
pretty sad
Originally posted by: waggy
Why the fvck should we donate to a guy who made a bunch of money and lost it? would anyone here donate to a someone here because they blew the money?
Originally posted by: flashbacck
Originally posted by: waggy
Why the fvck should we donate to a guy who made a bunch of money and lost it? would anyone here donate to a someone here because they blew the money?
His parents blew a large portion of his money when he was a kid. Also he and his wife just lost their child and their insurance didn't cover medical expenses, so he had to use whatever savings he had to pay for that.
Originally posted by: loup garou
Man, fvck that guy.
1. I want Arthur to lose his cushy job at NYCE where he screws over the working man then laughs at their expense.
Originally posted by: lederhosen
1. I want Arthur to lose his cushy job at NYCE where he screws over the working man then laughs at their expense.
The fact that he is not a working man makes this quote from his website hilarious. Maybe if he decided to get a job to pay the bills like the rest of the country he wouldn't have to whore himself on the internet.
Originally posted by: TheNinja
WTF does he need a $250k house in Wisconsin for? He could buy a decent place to live for $100k. He should call Zach b/c Zach and Slater always got Screech out of trouble. Or maybe Lyle Alzedo could come over too?
Originally posted by: Skiddex
Originally posted by: TheNinja
WTF does he need a $250k house in Wisconsin for? He could buy a decent place to live for $100k. He should call Zach b/c Zach and Slater always got Screech out of trouble. Or maybe Lyle Alzedo could come over too?
suburb realestate costs are rediculious around milwaukee....
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
On his website he says:
Let's face it, if he can't find the time to work on a mortgage for a famous celebrity, how will he handle the average person?"
He actually thinks that he's a famous celebrity? Internet celebrities are probably more famous than him!
Originally posted by: Armitage
Originally posted by: waggy
Why the fvck should we donate to a guy who made a bunch of money and lost it? would anyone here donate to a someone here because they blew the money?
QFT - and that show sucked anyway. Apparently standup comedy isn't paying the rent - time to get a real job.
On a more serious note, what is a "land contract"?
Land contracts vary widely from transaction to transaction.
In most cases, no grant deed is recorded. The buyer rarely obtains a new mortgage loan at the time of purchase. Instead, the new owner makes payments to an intermediary, who then makes payments on the seller?s mortgage, which is still in place.
Keep in mind that such an agreement usually violates the lender's guidelines. If the lender becomes aware of a transfer of title on the property (which is why you usually don't record the grant deed), they can exercise the "due on sale" clause of the note. This would require you to refinance the loan or sell the property. Since many who buy on land contracts have problems qualifying for a mortgage, you can see how this can lead to problems.
At the same time, lenders generally only check for transfers of title if the loan becomes delinquent.
Within a certain number of years, it is expected the buyer will be able to qualify for a loan. At that time, they will obtain a new mortgage and pay off whatever amount the land contract requires. Then a grant deed is recorded and full ownership is conveyed.
