• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

HELP:p4b266 or p4s333???? (sis or intel chipset)

halik

Lifer
they all identical, except for the chipset. i845 is about 50 bucks extra, so is it worth the money?
 
I know two people that have built up P4 systems around the p4s333 and have had great success

I usually tell people to go with it
 
'nother vote for SiS, I have a P4S333 and a 1.6a at 2320mhz 145fsb 290mhz memory ddr speed, I installed the motherboard on a system with an existing winxp install and winxp didnt even blink, it just installed all the motherboard devices and didnt even ask for a cd 🙂

It is a great combo, the P4 1.6a SiS chip and DDR memory, when I get my Geforce4 Ti 4600 next week I might need to chain my computer down so it doesnt shoot into orbit 😀
 


<< I installed the motherboard on a system with an existing winxp install and winxp didnt even blink, it just installed all the motherboard devices and didnt even ask for a cd >>



Me too!!
 
ok, one more thing - did you guys get it with or without the lan? Id like lan on mine and i cant seem to find one for a decent price
 
I'd go with Intel, as $50 more is worth it for garanteed stability and compatibility. It may work fine now, but you never know in the future with some new piece of hardware.
 
SiS doesn't offer that much stability. I have had hatred with SiS P3 chipsets. For the guaranteed stability, I would go with Intel.

Also, it only performs better than the 850 on some benchmarks when pair with PC2700 which, by now, costs AT LEAST $30.00 more per stick than RDRAM.

-x86
 
Well I have had both boards and I think the 845D is the better board. The P4S333 board I had (at first) did not want to load Windows XP. It kept telling me that the hard drive controller was incompatable, so I loaded Windows 98 se and the machine was lightning fast and got it to OC to around 2250 or so. Several days later the primary hard drive controller went out (several people that have had this board have had similar problems with the controller) and I RMA'ed it for an Asus P4B266-C and now I am happy to report that with a Northwood 1.6a that I am able to OC to 160 FSB for a system speed of 2560 mhz without any instablility.
 
Back
Top