- Oct 9, 1999
- 1,154
- 0
- 0
Is it just me or does ACPI suck? I finally got around to installing Win2000, and lo and behold, it stuck practically everything on IRQ 9. My Geforce, SB Live, SCSI card, and USB controller are all on IRQ 9, as well as the ACPI-Compliant system, whatever that is. So whats the deal? When my computer boots up it says my SCSI card is on IRQ 15, and I have a ton of free interrupts. Everything appears to work fine, but I'd rather all these devices have their own IRQ since it should be possible. So can anyone help me out with any friendly advice on how to take care of this and why I think ACPI is the main culprit?
BTW, is it a bad thing to use ISA cards in Win2000, some friend of mine makes this claim but I have an Etherlink III ISA network card. Seems to work fine, but is there any truth that it may make my system slower than a PCI NIC would? Thanks to anyone who can respond, I'm just now learning Win2000 and any help is appreciated.
System:
Asus P3B-F BX board
PIII 850
Geforce 2 GTS
SB Live
Tekram DC-390U2W SCSI card
SCSI hard drive and cd-readers, no IDE components, IDE, serial, and parallel ports disabled in bios.
3COM Etherlink III ISA NIC(old)
BTW, is it a bad thing to use ISA cards in Win2000, some friend of mine makes this claim but I have an Etherlink III ISA network card. Seems to work fine, but is there any truth that it may make my system slower than a PCI NIC would? Thanks to anyone who can respond, I'm just now learning Win2000 and any help is appreciated.
System:
Asus P3B-F BX board
PIII 850
Geforce 2 GTS
SB Live
Tekram DC-390U2W SCSI card
SCSI hard drive and cd-readers, no IDE components, IDE, serial, and parallel ports disabled in bios.
3COM Etherlink III ISA NIC(old)
