there are a million benchmarks is you look for them, all the synthetic benchmarks have been done (Sandra etc..), all the simulation type benchmarks have been done (3DMark, PCMark, Cinebench, ScienceMark, SuperPi 1M-32M, many others), and even real appl (games, winRAR, encoding). So, the vast majority of generally accepted benchmarks have been done of Conroe, however some will doubt the Intel provided benchmarks thinking maybe they are too high, and others will question the XS benchmarks saying they too low because only 512 RAM and beta board/BIOS. However, of all the benchmarks done this person has choosen the ones that show Conroe in the worest light. Of all the benchmarks Conroe wins 90% of the time (and remember this is the 316$ Conroe, not the 1200$ one). It is true that the number of sources is limited, but it is VERY deceptive to post the 1 benchmark that the A64 wins the most. Not like I can really understand why all this matters, you can't buy a Conroe, so whether or not its gonna blow everyones socks off makes no difference until you can actually buy one.
Also, the crazy claims about 4G AMD64s etc are just comming from nowhere. He is getting mad that people with REAL benchmarks of a REAL processesor are posting about how good it is, then right after that posting that a 4G A64 with Krazy Kool Z-Ram is gonna be way better when he has absolutely no basis for that claim.
Facebook
Twitter