Help me understand the current economic crisis...

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
31
91
So I've been keeping a close eye on the news. Not only how we are doing in the United States but I am interested in seeing how the global economy is doing as well. And apparently everyone is going to shit. I am just trying to understand... how?

My initial assumption that as our economy faltered someone else's would thrive seems to be way off the mark. How can the entire globe be suffering? What causes this to happen and if you look at similar cases in history how did 'we' (the world) recover?

It just feels like something is missing that will make it all click in my mind. I understand that when people have less money they buy less thus causing less production, job cuts, less money, less purchasing, less production, job cuts, etc....... but I am just missing something on why it gets started to begin with.

Am I alone and being completely baffled by this? Don't worry I'll take the ignorance on for all of us. ;)
 

Wheezer

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 1999
6,731
1
81
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
So I've been keeping a close eye on the news. Not only how we are doing in the United States but I am interested in seeing how the global economy is doing as well. And apparently everyone is going to shit. I am just trying to understand... how?

My initial assumption that as our economy faltered someone else's would thrive seems to be way off the mark. How can the entire globe be suffering? What causes this to happen and if you look at similar cases in history how did 'we' (the world) recover?

It just feels like something is missing that will make it all click in my mind. I understand that when people have less money they buy less thus causing less production, job cuts, less money, less purchasing, less production, job cuts, etc....... but I am just missing something on why it gets started to begin with.

Am I alone and being completely baffled by this? Don't worry I'll take the ignorance on for all of us. ;)

shit rolls down hill.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,078
136
I learned all this stuff in 9th grade economics.
The problem is none of it stuck. We started with the stock crash in '29 and went from there.

I learn so much stuff that just never sticks with me. Sad.
After reading books like "Rich Dad, Poor Dad" it makes me realize I might have a better quality of life if I spent more time learning about how our economy really works.
Am approaching the big 3-0 next May and most of the stories I hear from my mom is all the guys who are more sucessful than me.
 

Special K

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2000
7,098
0
76
These two podcasts focus primarily on what happened in the US, but it's not too much of a stretch to understand how these events affected the rest of the world.

First, listen to this one that explains the mortgage meltdown:

link

Then listen to this one that explains what happened this fall to make things worse:

link
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
31
91
Originally posted by: shortylickens
I learned all this stuff in 9th grade economics.
The problem is none of it stuck. We started with the stock crash in '29 and went from there.

Yeah it's sad that I know I learned all of this crap too and now don't remember a damn thing.

 

ja1484

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2007
2,438
2
0
Nutshell version:

The US economy was the engine driving the global economy. Remember all that talk about US imports exceeding exports and how dangerous that was for our economy? Well, everyone else's economy was dependent upon us buying those imports, and we suddenly stopped buying because no one can use their house as an ATM after the subprime crash. the housing bubble made a lot of people fake-rich. Then it popped, and they suddenly don't have the assets of wealthy people anymore, but do you think any of their creditors dropped the liabilities? No sir. That's what happens when you build wealth on paper only.

There's some other shit that boils down to this: The economy is fake and has been for a while, primarily based on numbers that banks made the fuck up. Most of this came from way over-extended credit. There was a trend of "have now, pay later" that ran rampant for about the past 20 years. Guess what? It's later now, and everyone spent their later money back at now so they could have more. Oh shit.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,078
136
Originally posted by: ja1484
Nutshell version:

The US economy was the engine driving the global economy. Remember all that talk about US imports exceeding exports and how dangerous that was for our economy? Well, everyone else's economy was dependent upon us buying those imports, and we suddenly stopped buying because no one can use their house as an ATM after the subprime crash. the housing bubble made a lot of people fake-rich. Then it popped, and they suddenly don't have the assets of wealthy people anymore, but do you think any of their creditors dropped the liabilities? No sir. That's what happens when you build wealth on paper only.

There's some other shit that boils down to this: The economy is fake and has been for a while, primarily based on numbers that banks made the fuck up. Most of this came from way over-extended credit. There was a trend of "have now, pay later" that ran rampant for about the past 20 years. Guess what? It's later now, and everyone spent their later money back at now so they could have more. Oh shit.
That part I did know but not from formal education. Mostly from books I read on my own.

Money is not value. Money is a representation of value somewhere else. It used to be the stockpiles of gold the US government kept. But then we went off the gold standard and that changed things.

I do know that part of the problem was real estate taking in more money than its actual value. Too many homes were being sold at a price of $300,000 that werent actually worth it. Their value was closer to 150 or 200.
Now I know lots of folks say "its worth whatever someone is willing to pay" but thats just not the case. You actually need to have some value behind the money. You cant just create value out of thin air. Money can be created easily, but its not value.

Actually, I learned that from Starship Troopers (the book, not the movie). One of Rico's teachers was talking about how you could make value by combining various resources. You take some flour, wheat, sugar, and apples (each of which has value on its own), then apply a little little time and effort and you have apple pie, the value of which is higher than all the individual parts.
Houses were somewhat like that. You take a bunch of wood and a bunch of labor and you get a house. Its value was higher than the raw materials, but too many folks were asking for outrageous amounts of money for it, and they could get it easily because the banks were willing to make the loans.

It was theorized many years ago that this would cause problems. Eventually the money going back and forth would get outrageous and sooner or later someone would question the actual value behind it all, not the money.

Money in and of itself it basically useless. It just represents some other sort of value, and when things flucuate in the economy items of real value are much more useful than money. Part of our current problem was too many people using houses and not realizing how valuable they really were. They were basing the value on what they got for it, or what they paid for it, and that number was way out of alignment with its actual worth.
 

ja1484

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2007
2,438
2
0
Originally posted by: shortylickens

That part I did know but not from formal education. Mostly from books I read on my own.

Money is not value. Money is a representation of value somewhere else. It used to be the stockpiles of gold the US government kept. But then we went off the gold standard and that changed things.

I do know that part of the problem was real estate taking in more money than its actual value. Too many homes were being sold at a price of $300,000 that werent actually worth it. Their value was closer to 150 or 200.
Now I know lots of folks say "its worth whatever someone is willing to pay" but thats just not the case. You actually need to have some value behind the money. You cant just create value out of thin air. Money can be created easily, but its not value.


Actually, it is worth whatever someone is willing to pay. That's how we formed the bubble in the first place. That's also why they're called "toxic assets" now - the price people are willing to pay dropped like a rock.

I mean, where were people putting their "non-money" value to maintain it? Remember how everyone is always encourage to buy a home rather than rent one because at least then you have equity? Well, the bottom line is it doesn't matter what asset you put your money into, it matters how the market values those assets. Two years ago, people's ARM/sub prime mortgaged houses were worth $400,000 because they were exchanging for those amounts. They aren't any more, so they're not any more.


Actually, I learned that from Starship Troopers (the book, not the movie). One of Rico's teachers was talking about how you could make value by combining various resources. You take some flour, wheat, sugar, and apples (each of which has value on its own), then apply a little little time and effort and you have apple pie, the value of which is higher than all the individual parts.
Houses were somewhat like that. You take a bunch of wood and a bunch of labor and you get a house. Its value was higher than the raw materials, but too many folks were asking for outrageous amounts of money for it, and they could get it easily because the banks were willing to make the loans.

Sort of. Sometimes. It's all about supply and demand. If we took the world supply of flour and baked it all into apple pies, we'd have oversupply of one and not enough of another, and flour would suddenly be more valuable than apple pies.

To wit:

We built a shit ton of houses because everyone wanted a house. The problem was, not everyone who wanted one was a good credit risk. Illegal aliens, drug addicts, convicted felon highschool dropout janitors...these people are considered unlikely to repay their loans. So, we came up with a new loaning system which basically allowed these people to lie their way into owning a home.

Now, suddenly everyone has a house. These houses are overvalued because appraisals kept rising on the assumption that this demand would continue indefinitely. Bad assumption. Now that you're out of stupid people to sell unfair loans to, demand has screeched to a halt.

It was theorized many years ago that this would cause problems. Eventually the money going back and forth would get outrageous and sooner or later someone would question the actual value behind it all, not the money.

A lot of things get theorized all the time.

Money in and of itself it basically useless. It just represents some other sort of value, and when things flucuate in the economy items of real value are much more useful than money. Part of our current problem was too many people using houses and not realizing how valuable they really were. They were basing the value on what they got for it, or what they paid for it, and that number was way out of alignment with its actual worth.

That number is way out of alignment *now*. It wasn't when you could sell a 1/4 acre lot to a cross-eyed McDonald's employee for $350,000.

Money is just a universal value exchange system. It's basically a way of solving the barter problem. You want some sheet metal. Jimmy wants some corn. He has sheet metal, but you don't have corn on you. However, you do have something that can be exchanged almost anywhere for corn. Jimmy takes that in lieu of the actual corn. You have your sheet metal. Jimmy eventually has his corn.

The best part? Monetary value is completely based on worldwide acceptance of value. It's fake too. If enough people worldwide decided the dollar was going to be worth less tomorrow, down goes the dollar.

In light of that, the national debt is kind of a good thing in a roundabout way. With so many people worldwide holding on to so many US dollars, they'd be screwing themselves to devalue our currency. We're economic suicide bombers!

 

keird

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2002
3,714
9
81
Originally posted by: ja1484
With so many people worldwide holding on to so many US dollars, they'd be screwing themselves to devalue our currency. We're economic suicide bombers!
lulz

 

Nerva

Platinum Member
Jul 26, 2005
2,784
0
0
1. 1998 Clinton administration promoted home ownership for all Americans, interest rates were lowered and people with poor credits (i.e. subprime) are able to borrow money and buy homes.

2. people expect real estate prices to keep soaring, thus you have the house flipping phenomenon. you have a lot of people who have no business buying houses and getting i/o mortgages to try to make a quick buck in the market

3. mortgages are pooled together to form CDOs & CMBS, essentially bonds that pay interest, where the cash flow for the interest payment comes from people paying their mortgages.

4. housing bubble bursts, housing prices drop 20%, people are no longer able to flip houses or even pay the mortgage, default on their debt and the CDOs drop in price.

5. Investment banks (it is the people at the structured product desks, NOT THE TRADITIONAL INVESTMENT BANKERS) generates a profit buy making a market for these CDOs. But since no one is buying CDOs, the investment banks are left holding the securities that falls in value. Because of mark to market accounting, these assets had to be written down when values evaporated

 

xSauronx

Lifer
Jul 14, 2000
19,582
4
81
there was a funny slideshow type presentation about the situation that ended with everyone saying "fuck you" but ill be damned if i know where to find it