Zaap
Diamond Member
- Jun 12, 2008
- 7,162
- 424
- 126
Ah, got it. I would have just said this for clarity. (Why not a direct upload, no transcoding).I dunno, a direct upload with no transcoding?
Ah, got it. I would have just said this for clarity. (Why not a direct upload, no transcoding).I dunno, a direct upload with no transcoding?
1. Disabling the apps is still probably the best method. The Note 5 and S7 don't have the hitches of earlier phones in my personal experience. I've used an S3, Note 2, S5, S6, Note 5 and S7 Edge for comparison.
2. I just donwloaded the dark material theme and use the Samsung launcher. Seems pretty minimal, but I do use fore than 4 apps.
3. Not sure what caused the issues with battery life on the S6. Some days where good, some bad and it was hard to figure out what was killing it. My Note 5 goes a long time with heavy use and the S7 Edge is even better. Shouldn't have to mess with any battery managers or app killers.
4. Photo sync is seamless now. The options are 1) lets Google downscale your photos and store them for free or 2) sync them at the native resolution and it counts against your quota. 4k also will get synce at the native resolution, but the app will only do that when on Wifi. Smaller videos can be synced over the network.
5. My LG Watch R doesn't have issues with missing notifications. Can't speak for all the models.
6. The Android Auto app is in the store. Just download it, hook up your phone to the car stereo's USB port and the app should connect/mirror.
Im certainly not an audiophile that can hear all these magical differences (in my car certainly) but what exactly would be better than 320kbs mp3?
I mentioned it before but the s6 does not do well in areas with marginal service. My apartment's (and the subway) causes constant radio activity (which I think is trying to find towers) and it just crushes battery life. My iphone didn't have that problem, or had better power management.
It doesn't. That would be nice though.bonus points if waze works! carplay can't do that.
Oh, that's an easy one: FLAC
It doesn't. That would be nice though.
The audio difference (with a decent amp and speakers) between any compressed format and FLAC is obvious, even to my 67 yr. old tennitus ringing ears.
Bull. Study after study after study has shown this to not be the case. No one is able to tell the formats apart.
I can with certain music under certain circumstances but not often and not consistently.Bull. Study after study after study has shown this to not be the case. No one is able to tell the formats apart.
Some people can detect the differences.
"No one is able to tell the formats apart" sounds a lot like "nobody can perceive framerates above 30fps."
The claim that people can tell the difference between FLAC and mp3 is more like the claim that homeopathy cured cancer. Absolute bunk that no scientific study supports at all.
Some people can detect the differences.
"No one is able to tell the formats apart" sounds a lot like "nobody can perceive framerates above 30fps."
Given that low bitrate MP3s sound terrible I'm thinking that you might want to rephrase that.
There is literally nothing stopping me from creating low bitrate FLAC.
FLAC is a container, it makes absolutely no distinction of how good the sound quality is. I could easily make a FLAC song sound worse than an MP3.
Also, when making these arguments, of freaking course we're assuming a standard 320kbps mp3. Why even mention anything else. When you make comparisons between any piece of tech, do you normally assume one piece of tech has broken components?
I fear that the OP bought the wrong Android phone if he's not a fan of bloatware. He probably should have got a Nexus device instead.
Cyanogenmod might help, but you'll likely be swapping bloatware for missing functionality at that point.
There is literally nothing stopping me from creating low bitrate FLAC.
FLAC is a container, it makes absolutely no distinction of how good the sound quality is. I could easily make a FLAC song sound worse than an MP3.
Also, when making these arguments, of freaking course we're assuming a standard 320kbps mp3. Why even mention anything else. When you make comparisons between any piece of tech, do you normally assume one piece of tech has broken components?
Get a Windows Phone![]()
It's not 320kbs .MP3 that's lousy, in fact, it is quite good as a standard. The problem is that even with the good codec, either due to a poor encoder, or equally terribad source, music I download from Google Play sounds like a bad Youtube rip that's been encoded several times over down to 64kbs.Im certainly not an audiophile that can hear all these magical differences (in my car certainly) but what exactly would be better than 320kbs mp3?