Originally posted by: genEus
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Just curious, but why must it be a pure hardware-based RAID card for a basic function like RAID 1?
I dunno... Just heard that they're better/faster/less error prone... Am I wrong here? I REALLY don't want to lose my data ever again... also don't wanna spend $390 though
I don't know about speed; I did have two drives in RAID 0 awhile ago using a cheap PCI thing from Newegg. I did corrupt it once, but that was because I was testing out my CPU's upper GHz limits that day. Apparently I went too high - first ntfs.sys was lost, then the entire partition. Oops. Other than that, it all worked fine. Speed? CPU utilization was very low - no higher than in any of my other systems using onboard non-RAID IDE controllers.
I could plug the Promise sx4000 right now, and suggest RAID 5, but I do that enough.

That, and that's an expensive, but elegant, solution. The card alone is around $150, plus a stick of RAM for it, plus the drives.
Link.
I did just find too, it's not available at Newegg. I only see the
SX4060 now. Looks like a step up though; the
SX4060 already has 64MB of ECC RAM right there on the card. Doesn't say what the max it'll support is though; the SX4000 had a max of 256MB.
These SX40X0 cards are long cards, just so you know. Not all cases can take one.
If you do go RAID 5, you can get some pretty impressive speeds, along with redundancy. I've got 4 drives in RAID 5, and when I run benchmarks, I get sustained read speeds over 100MB/sec.