Originally posted by: z0mb13
Originally posted by: sygyzy
Ever since when did trying to defend yourself make lying an acceptable crime?
the reason why the case got so big is just because its martha stewart invovled.. the prosecutors just want to set an example of her by nailing her to the wall..
Imagine this scenario:
you are driving in the freeway and doing 10 over the speed limit. A cop pulled you over, and you said you are going on the speed limit. THIS IS ALSO LYING! and you should also go to jail for it. But do people go to jail for this? NO coz its such a trivial case.
Martha did lie, but she does not deserve to go to jail.
All martha did is defend herself, and yes she did lie, but she did that because she want to defend herself..
The lesson that will be taken from this case is that people will NOT talk to the government regarding ANYTHING, since whatever you say will be used against you..
THERE ARE FAR MORE people that deserve to go to jail. Executives from enron, global crossing, rite aid, etc eliminated MILLIONS of dollars from stakeholders.. and they are not seeing any jail time. They deserve to be punished 10000 times more than martha..
but the question is, why are the prosecutors so bent in nailing martha? IMO its just because of her image of perfection, and it creates a BIG material for the media to chew on... and also for the general public
Insider trading is RAMPANT EVERYHWERE.... everyone does insider trading in some sense.. you hear from your family, buy this stock since they just invented something.. that is ALSO insider trading
oh and also the insider trading charge was dropped against Martha, so they only got her from lying..
If she had kept her mouth shut, he would be OK... again the message for the people will be: its better to keep your mouth shut... coz they will nail you if you do talk..